Project template
[Project Name] — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
[Project Name] — a [category] project on [chain], token (symbol: [ticker]).
Disclaimer (full text)
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a [protocol/app/network/marketplace] for [plain-purpose].
- Who it’s for: [primary users: users/developers/teams/businesses].
- Why onchain/token: [one sentence without AI terms: payments/access/incentives/security/accounting].
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: [action].
- The system does: [what happens inside].
- The user gets: [result/benefit].
- Where the blockchain is: [what is onchain exactly: settlement/accounting/guarantees/ownership].
- Token role (if any): [why the token is needed; if none — “no token”].
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport (short facts, no links)
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | [ ] |
| Also known as (aliases) (synonyms/symbol/spellings) | [ ] |
| Logo (logo) (link/file) | [ ] |
| Token symbol (ticker) (or — if no token) | [ ] |
| Category (1–3: DeFi / DEX / NFT / AI / Infra / GameFi / RWA / Meme / Other) | [ ] |
| Primary chain (chain) | [ ] |
| Type (EVM / non‑EVM / Appchain) | [ ] |
| Network status (mainnet / testnet / beta) | [ ] |
| Consensus (consensus) (PoS/PoW/…) | [ ] |
| Launch date (launch_date) (YYYY or date) | [ ] |
| Project status (status) (active / in development / closed) | [ ] |
| Token (standard) (native / ERC‑20 / SPL / CW20 / none) | [ ] |
| Token contract (address or —) | [ ] |
| Token model (token_type) (utility / governance / fee‑mechanism / …) | [ ] |
| Max supply (max supply; token supply parameters) | [ ] |
| Circulating supply (circulating supply; reference per source) | [ ] |
| Issuance (fixed / inflationary / burn / unknown) | [ ] |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) (1–2 facts) | [ ] |
| Governance (DAO / multisig / company / unknown) | [ ] |
| Admins/keys (renounced / timelock / multisig / unknown) | [ ] |
| Audit (yes/no/unknown + link) | [ ] |
| Bug bounty (yes/no/unknown + link) | [ ] |
| Team (team) (brief/unknown) | [ ] |
| Funding (investors/funding) (grants/rounds/funds; confirmed/unknown) | [ ] |
| AI component (ai_component) (3–10 words) | [ ] |
| Use‑case (use_case) (3–10 words) | [ ] |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit (X/6 + level) | [ ] |
| DecAI Fit component summary (ai_score / onchain_score / token_score / evidence_score) | [ ] |
| Last verified (YYYY‑MM‑DD) | [ ] |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | [ ] |
| Docs | [ ] |
| GitHub | [ ] |
| Whitepaper | [ ] |
| Explorer | [ ] |
| X | [ ] |
| Discord | [ ] |
| Telegram | [ ] |
| Medium | [ ] |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | [ ] |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | [ ] |
General project overview
[In detail and in plain language (without repeating the TL;DR above): what the project is, what problem it solves, who it is for, and what form it takes (protocol/app/network).]
Features/modules
- [Key product modules/components (as a list).]
- [What matters most / what is unique for users.]
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: [who does what → what outcome]
- Scenario 2: [who does what → what outcome]
- Scenario 3: [optional]
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: [wallet/account/minimum requirements]
- Network/chain: [which network, where to switch]
- Fees: [which fees apply and where they occur]
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: [contracts/nodes/clients/indexers/backend, etc.]
- Participant roles: [users/validators/providers/operators…]
- Where logic runs: [L1/L2/appchain/offchain + what runs where]
- Dependencies: [oracles/DA/bridges/RPC providers/storage, etc.]
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: [what users pay for / what they get]
- Protocol necessity drivers: [who uses the token for what, and why it does not work without it]
- Who pays fees: [users/providers/third parties]
- Where fees go: [validators/providers/treasury/burn]
- Issuance/burn: [model + links/parameters]
- Security/incentive mechanisms: [staking/slashing/other; yes/no, terms, risks]
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: [vesting/unlocks; who gets what/schedule/links; to assess centralization/incentives]
- Treasury: [who controls it / how it is spent / links]
Governance
- Who makes decisions: [DAO/team/foundation/multisig]
- How protocol parameters change: [process/voting/upgrades]
- Where decisions are discussed/made: [forum/repo/snapshot/links]
- Keys/multisig: [signers/threshold/links]
Security and incidents
- Audits: [who/when/links] (if many — put a table below)
- Bug bounty: [yes/no, link]
- Incidents: [hacks/outages/hard forks/postmortems]
- Threat model: [main risks and security assumptions]
Project status and timeline
- Current status: [mainnet/testnet/beta/…]
- Key releases/milestones: [dates/versions]
- Roadmap: [what is being built now + link]
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: [wallets/bridges/infrastructure/tools/exchanges (if applicable)]
- Partners: [if there are confirmed ones]
- Where it’s actually used: [integration examples/use cases + links]
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? [1–2 sentences]
- What is truly onchain? [1–2 sentences]
- Why is a token needed? [1–2 sentences]
- Red flags: AI‑washing / onchain‑washing / token‑washing [ ], what to double‑check [ ], key AI‑washing risks [ ].
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: [X/6 — low/medium/high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis]
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | [low/medium/high] | [0–3] |
| Onchain necessity | [low/medium/high] | [0–3] |
| Token necessity | [no token/low/medium/high] | [0–3] |
| Evidence | [Tier‑1 present/absent] | [0–3] |
Details
AI reality
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Claim (one line): [what the AI actually does]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is enough for 1, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Claim (one line): [what demo/example exists and what it shows]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is enough for 1, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Metrics: [ ]
- Context (version/date/how measured): [ ]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why the metrics are valid/sufficient, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Claim (one line): [what is documented/described]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is enough for 1, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Chain: [ ]
- Addresses/identifiers: [ ]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is enough for 1, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- What useful logic is onchain: [ ]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is enough for 1, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- “Replace the blockchain” test: what breaks without onchain: [ ]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why the test is proven, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Claim (one line): [the project has no token]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is enough, or why unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Claim (one line): [what users pay for with the token]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is proven, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Claim (one line): [which incentives/collateral/penalties exist and why]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is proven, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Claim (one line): [how the token is used for governance]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this is proven, or why 0/unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): [1/0/unknown]
- Claim (one line): [why the token can/cannot be replaced]
- Evidence: Tier‑[1/2] — [link], [link]
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): [why this conclusion is supported, or why unknown]
- Conflict note (if any): [ ]
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | [link] | [ ] |
| Tier‑2 | [link] | [ ] |
| Tier‑3 | [link] | [ ] |
No comments to display
No comments to display