What is Tier-1, Tier-2, Tier-3
Every project card on DecAIHub bases its conclusions and assessments on sources of varying quality. To help readers quickly gauge how well-supported a given conclusion is, all sources are classified into three tiers: Tier-1, Tier-2, and Tier-3.
In short: Tier-1 is evidence. Tier-2 is context. Tier-3 is noise.
Tier-1: evidence
Tier-1 sources are the closest to the project's actual reality. Key conclusions in the card are built on these.
Examples of Tier-1:
- On-chain facts — contract addresses, transactions, protocol parameters that can be opened and verified in a blockchain explorer.
- Official documentation — docs, whitepaper, technical specifications with dates and version numbers.
- Source code and releases — public repositories, release tags, changelogs, real development activity.
- Audits and security reports — published audit reports, post-mortems, bug bounty terms and payouts.
If a card states "Tier-1 confirmed," the conclusion can be independently verified against a specific artifact.
Tier-2: context
Tier-2 sources are useful for orientation and cross-referencing, but they do not constitute evidence on their own.
Examples of Tier-2:
- Aggregators (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko) — descriptions, links, categories, basic metadata.
- Ecosystem catalogues — reference information and links (as external context, not proof of technology).
- On-chain analytics and dashboards — visualizations and metrics (methodology matters).
- Public statements by the team — interviews, AMAs, presentations (treated as claims that require Tier-1 confirmation).
Tier-2 helps locate Tier-1 sources and understand context, but cannot be the sole basis for a conclusion in the card.
Tier-3: noise
Tier-3 sources have low credibility. They can be read to gauge "sentiment," but should be used with extreme caution in assessments.
Examples of Tier-3:
- Influencer posts without links to primary sources.
- PR publications and promotional reviews.
- News reposts without verifiable details.
- Rumors and anonymous claims.
If only Tier-3 sources are found for a project (with no Tier-1 or Tier-2), the DecAI Fit is automatically capped at a maximum of 2/6 — the system does not allow a high score when all available sources are Tier-3 only.
Why some evidence is "free" and some is not
The DecAIHub whitepaper introduces an important distinction:
- Architecturally Embedded Transparency (AET) — data that exists "for free" thanks to the technology itself. For example, on-chain transactions and contract states: they are public by the very nature of blockchain, and a project cannot hide or embellish them.
- Voluntarily Produced Transparency (VPT) — data that requires deliberate effort and resources from the project: security audits, maintained documentation, public repositories with release histories, AI quality metrics.
It is at the VPT level that the gap is most often observed: a project may claim to have AI, yet verifiable artifacts may be absent. The reasons vary — from an early stage of development to a closed architecture. Therefore, in DecAIHub the gap between claims and the availability of VPT artifacts is recorded as a low-verifiability signal as of the verification date.
How Tier affects conclusions in the card
| Situation | What it means for the reader |
|---|---|
| A key conclusion has Tier-1 support | The conclusion is backed by a verifiable artifact |
| No Tier-1 found; Tier-2 available | The conclusion is based on context; independent verification is needed |
| Tier-3 only | The conclusion is weakly supported as of the verification date; DecAI Fit is capped |
| Tier-1 sources conflict | Marked as "CONFLICT"; flags are set to 0 pending re-verification |
In the Evidence table within the card, each row shows: the Tier, the source, and what exactly it proves. If Tier-1 is not found for a key claim, this is explicitly recorded as a separate row.
Do not confuse with
- Tier is not a project rating. Tier describes the quality of a source, not the quality of the project itself.
- Tier-2 is not a "bad source." It is useful context that aids orientation but does not replace evidence.
No comments to display
No comments to display