Skip to main content

Artificial Superintelligence Alliance

Artificial Superintelligence Alliance — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI Alliance) — an AI/Other | Infra alliance around the unification of AI platforms and tokenomics; token: ASI.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an alliance (Fetch.ai + SingularityNET + Ocean Protocol) with a plan to unify the ecosystems and tokenomics under a common ASI token.
  • Who it’s for: the tokenholder communities and the developers/users of applications in these ecosystems.
  • Why onchain/token: the unified token is used as a common “utility token” and a coordination mechanism (including voting) for the merged tokenomics.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: holds FET/AGIX/OCEAN and (if necessary) takes part in the migration/swap into ASI.
  2. The system does: converts the tokens at fixed ratios and transitions the ecosystem to the common ASI token.
  3. The user gets: a single ASI token and participation in the merged tokenomics/ecosystem.
  4. Where the blockchain is: issuance and circulation of the token (including ERC‑20 on Ethereum) and the related migration processes/contracts.
  5. Token role (if any): ASI — a common utility/governance token for the merged networks/platforms.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Artificial Superintelligence Alliance
Also known as (aliases) ASI Alliance, ASI
Logo (logo) ../assets/7_artificial-superintelligence-alliance_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) ASI
Category AI/Other | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) —
Launch date (launch_date) 2024-07-01
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xaea46A60368A7bD060eec7DF8CBa43b7EF41Ad85
Token model (token_type) utility (ecosystem + governance)
Max supply 2,630,547,141
Issuance fixed (max supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) Conversion of FET/AGIX/OCEAN into ASI at fixed ratios; a single supply of 2,630,547,141.
Governance company/foundation (council + tokenholder votes)
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) Fetch.ai / SingularityNET / Ocean Protocol (foundations)
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) positioning only (decentralized AGI/ASI)
Use‑case (use_case) unification of AI platforms + tokenomics
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-10

General project overview

Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (ASI Alliance) is an initiative to unify three “decentralized AI” ecosystems (Fetch.ai, SingularityNET, Ocean Protocol) through common tokenomics and a roadmap toward decentralized AGI/ASI.

Important: within DecAI Fit we assess specifically the verifiability of the “AI” claims (whether there are Tier‑1 artifacts about a real AI subsystem in the product), not “how hyped the project is”. According to Tier‑1 sources, the alliance’s intent/roadmap and the merger tokenomics are well confirmed; Tier‑1 evidence of a specific working AI component at the “ASI Alliance protocol level” was not identified.

Features/modules

  • Common ASI token: conversion of FET/AGIX/OCEAN into a single ASI at fixed ratios.
  • Governance layer: a council is described, along with tokenholder participation via votes on key decisions.
  • Roadmap: a plan to integrate the stacks/applications and scale up decentralized compute for AI.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a holder of AGIX/OCEAN/FET → migrates/receives a conversion into ASI → continues to participate in the ecosystem through the single token.
  • Scenario 2: a community member → votes on key decisions (merger/adding projects/constitution changes) → influences the direction of the alliance.
  • Scenario 3: a developer/project → uses the common tokenomics and the integrations between the Fetch/SNET/Ocean stack (per the roadmap) → launches AI applications.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet (if you hold ERC‑20 on Ethereum) or the use of centralized exchanges (where the conversion may happen automatically).
  • Network/chain: for ERC‑20 — Ethereum.
  • Fees: standard network fees (e.g. gas on Ethereum) for onchain migration/transfer operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the ASI token on several networks (including ERC‑20 on Ethereum), migration/conversion contracts and bridge infrastructure (described in the Vision Paper and the merger guide).
  • Participant roles: tokenholders (participation in migration/votes), member foundations (coordination), the teams of the three ecosystems.
  • Where logic runs: token issuance/circulation — onchain (e.g. Ethereum ERC‑20); coordination/roadmap — largely offchain (foundations/council).
  • Dependencies: Ethereum and other networks/bridges (FetchChain/Cosmos, Cardano, BNB Chain, Polygon — listed as supported post‑merger in the Vision Paper).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: in the Vision Paper, ASI is described as a “decentralized‑AI utility token” for use across the three platforms; tokenholders also vote on key decisions.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: unified tokenomics is the basis for coordinating the merger and incentivizing the integration of the ecosystems.
  • Who pays fees: users pay the fees of the respective networks for transfers/migration (e.g. Ethereum gas).
  • Where fees go: depends on the specific network (not specified by a single rule in the card’s Tier‑1 sources).
  • Issuance/burn: per the Vision Paper, the total supply is fixed: 2,630,547,141 ASI.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: incentives and programs depend on the individual ecosystems; the common mechanism is the tokenomics and governance processes (Tier‑1).
  • Distribution and conversion: FET→ASI 1:1; AGIX→ASI 0.433350:1; OCEAN→ASI 0.433226:1 (Tier‑1).
  • Treasury: distributed management via foundations/pools and council coordination (Tier‑1 Vision Paper).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: an Artificial Superintelligence Council (member foundations) is described + tokenholder votes on specific events.
  • How protocol parameters change: key changes (e.g. supply expansion/constitution changes) assume council participation and a tokenholder vote (Tier‑1).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: the official ASI Alliance documentation and governance publications/archive.
  • Keys/multisig: — (not established within this card).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (for ASI Alliance as a merged entity, no public audits were recorded per Tier‑1).
  • Bug bounty: — (a bug bounty program specifically for ASI Alliance is not confirmed per Tier‑1).
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: high risk of scams/phishing during the migration (the documentation contains a scam warning); also bridge and migration‑contract risks.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: an active initiative; the token circulates on mainnet networks (e.g. Ethereum ERC‑20).
  • Key releases/milestones: 2024‑04 (Vision Paper); 2024‑07‑01 start of the two‑phase merger/migration process (Tier‑1).
  • Roadmap: a public document is available (see links_*).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: migration tools and exchange/bridge support; the cross‑chain deployments of the token are listed in the Vision Paper.
  • Partners: the three member foundations (Fetch.ai Foundation, SingularityNET Foundation, Ocean Protocol Foundation).
  • Where it’s actually used: tokenomics and governance in the merged ecosystem; specific product AI use cases mostly belong to the individual member platforms (Fetch/SNET/Ocean).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The Tier‑1 Vision Paper describes a roadmap toward decentralized AGI/ASI and lists the members’ AI directions/stack. At the same time, a “single working AI component of ASI Alliance” as a product artifact (AI_1..AI_4) is not confirmed per Tier‑1.
  • What is truly onchain? Onchain here is mainly the ASI token (including ERC‑20 on Ethereum) and the related migration/conversion processes.
  • Why is a token needed? The token is the basis of the common tokenomics and governance: council processes and tokenholder votes on key decisions are described.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing — medium risk (many claims/roadmap, but few verifiable product AI artifacts of the “alliance” itself); onchain‑washing — medium risk (onchain is mainly the token/migration); token‑washing — medium risk (the token matters for the merger/coordination, but its utility in a “real service” needs to be checked separately for each of the members).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The Vision Paper formulates a roadmap for “Building Decentralized Artificial Superintelligence” and describes AI R&D directions.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is Tier‑1 intent/roadmap; it does not prove the existence of a working single AI component of the “alliance” (AI_1..AI_4).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 does not record a specific working AI function/model of “ASI Alliance” as a single protocol/product.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The document describes the members’ directions/platforms but does not present a “single AI module of the alliance” as a fact.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo of an “AI component of the alliance” (as opposed to individual members) was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.superintelligence.io/artificial-superintelligence-alliance/vision-paper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The page leads to the Vision Paper but does not present a demo/repo with reproducible AI results of the alliance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Vision Paper contains no reproducible quality metrics of an “AI core of the alliance” as a product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 technical description of a single AI model/versions of the “alliance” was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The document describes the members’ directions and stacks, but not a specification of a “single AI component” (versions/architecture/artifacts).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0xaea46A60368A7bD060eec7DF8CBa43b7EF41Ad85
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xaea46A60368A7bD060eec7DF8CBa43b7EF41Ad85
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain artifact of the token (ERC‑20) is verifiable via the official block explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: Per Tier‑1, no separate onchain logic of the alliance is confirmed beyond the token/token migration.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 focuses on tokenomics/coordination and the members’ stack; no separate onchain logic of the “alliance” is singled out.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the alliance as a coordination effort could exist without a blockchain; onchain here is mainly needed for token issuance/migration.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.superintelligence.io/artificial-superintelligence-alliance/archive/navigating-the-asi-token-merger-a-comprehensive-guide
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the onchain token merger but does not prove that the whole “product” breaks down without a blockchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, ASI.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Vision Paper directly describes “convert … into the new $ASI”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of “payment for a specific service specifically in the ASI token” at the alliance level was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The document calls ASI a “utility token” but does not fix a specific tariff/payment function of the “alliance” as a protocol fact.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/pools are described at the level of individual members/platforms; a single collateral/penalty mechanism of ASI Alliance is not confirmed in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Vision Paper describes directions/pools in the individual networks but does not define a single penalty protocol of the alliance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The Vision Paper records the participation of $ASI token holders in votes on important decisions (e.g. supply expansion/constitution changes).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The governance section describes events that require token holder approval.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Replacing the token contradicts the goal of unifying the tokenomics; Tier‑1 does not claim “replaceability”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 builds the design around a common token and supply/conversions; there is no statement about replacement.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://434267010-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FE0eZgP8lxRNljW57Uw4H%2Fuploads%2FzuLTqcvU0P6PejPUONJG%2FArtificial%20Superintelligence%20(ASI)%20Alliance%20Vision%20Paper.pdf?alt=media&token=e794c589-d4ef-44d3-97c0-697b06956479 Roadmap/intent for “decentralized ASI”; governance (council + tokenholder votes); max supply and token conversion (FET/AGIX/OCEAN → ASI).
Tier‑1 https://docs.superintelligence.io/artificial-superintelligence-alliance/archive/navigating-the-asi-token-merger-a-comprehensive-guide Dates and the two‑phase merger/migration process (start 2024‑07‑01), fixed conversion ratios, scam warning.
Tier‑1 https://fetch.ai/blog/artificial-super-intelligence-alliance-token-merge-asi Tier‑1 from Fetch.ai: the merger scheme and the statement about the total supply (~2.63B) and the ratios.
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xaea46A60368A7bD060eec7DF8CBa43b7EF41Ad85 Onchain fact: the ERC‑20 token contract on Ethereum (verifiability).
Tier‑1 https://docs.superintelligence.io/artificial-superintelligence-alliance/leadership-and-governance Leadership and governance context (governing council and members).
Tier‑2 — —
Tier‑3 — —

No comments to display

Back to top