Decentrawood
Decentrawood (DEOD) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Decentrawood — a Metaverse / Gaming / NFT project: a virtual world/platform with land (LAND), NFT assets and a marketplace; the DEOD utility token (ERC‑20 on the Polygon network) is used as an in‑game currency/for settlements for LAND and NFT (per the whitepaper).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a metaverse platform with land purchases and trading of NFT assets.
- Who it’s for: players/users, as well as content creators (NFT/games/objects) within the platform.
- Why onchain/token: accounting of asset ownership (NFT/LAND) and settlements in the DEOD token.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: uses the DEOD token and/or interacts with the marketplace/land/assets.
- The system does: issues/accounts for NFT assets and LAND, allows buying/selling them via the marketplace.
- The user gets: digital ownership of assets and the ability to trade/monetize (per the platform concept).
- Where the blockchain is: the DEOD token and NFT assets (ERC‑721/1155 per the whitepaper) are recorded onchain (Polygon/EVM).
- Token role: an in‑game currency for LAND/NFT purchases and marketplace operations.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Decentrawood |
| Also known as (aliases) | DEOD, Decentrawood Metaverse |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/219_decentrawood_logo.png |
| Token symbol (ticker) | DEOD |
| Category | Metaverse | Gaming | NFT |
| Primary chain (chain) | Polygon |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Polygon) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | 2022 (whitepaper; release plan 2022–2023) |
| Project status (status) | active (website available) |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0xE77aBB1E75D2913B2076DD16049992FFeACa5235 |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (in-game currency) |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | DEOD is used for buying/selling LAND and NFT via the marketplace; the whitepaper mentions burning part of the platform’s revenue |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI-powered experiences |
| Use‑case (use_case) | metaverse land + NFT marketplace |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 1 / 2 / 0 / 1 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://www.decentrawood.com/ |
| Docs | https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | https://decentrawood.com/news |
| Whitepaper | https://decentrawood.com/whitepaper |
| Roadmap | https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://polygonscan.com/token/0xE77aBB1E75D2913B2076DD16049992FFeACa5235 |
| X | https://twitter.com/decentrawood |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/decentrawoodDisscussion |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/decentrawood |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/decentrawood/ |
General project overview
Decentrawood describes itself as a “decentralized metaverse platform” for entertainment: a virtual world with land (LAND), avatars and user digital assets that are tokenized as NFTs and traded via a marketplace.
The whitepaper explicitly states that the platform is “games on polygon blockchain” and uses the DEOD utility token as an in‑world currency for buying/selling LAND and other NFT assets. AI is mentioned as part of the “AI powered” experience and, in particular, as a way to make recommendations for shopping scenarios, but it does not look like the core of the product.
Features/modules
- NFT marketplace: issuance and trading of NFT assets (per the whitepaper).
- LAND: purchase/ownership/resale of plots in the metaverse (per the whitepaper).
- Avatars / assets: user digital objects and their modifications.
- In‑world economy: settlements in the DEOD token (per the whitepaper).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1 (LAND purchase): a user uses DEOD to acquire LAND/NFT → owns it and can resell it.
- Scenario 2 (NFT creation/trading): a creator mints an NFT → lists it on the marketplace → sells/exchanges it.
- Scenario 3 (game monetization): a user creates/buys game objects/experiences → monetizes them via the in‑game economy (as claimed).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an EVM wallet with Polygon support.
- Network/chain: Polygon.
- Fees: Polygon fees for operations with the token/contracts and for minting/transferring NFT.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the DEOD token (ERC‑20), NFT (ERC‑721/1155 — per the whitepaper), the marketplace and metaverse clients/content.
- Participant roles: users/content creators; platform operators.
- Where logic runs: ownership/trading onchain; the visual metaverse and game mechanics — offchain/clients.
- Dependencies: Polygon RPC; asset storage (the whitepaper mentions IPFS for digital assets).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: buying/selling LAND and NFT, marketplace operations (per the whitepaper).
- Protocol necessity drivers: if the marketplace is denominated in DEOD, the token is needed for transactions; under an alternative model (fiat/stablecoin) the token is partially replaceable.
- Who pays fees: users performing operations (gas + possible marketplace commissions).
- Where fees go: — (the whitepaper has no exact scheme of fee distribution in onchain contracts).
- Issuance/burn: max supply 2B (per CMC); the whitepaper mentions burning part of the revenue and a separate minting/allotment scheme — requires reconciliation with the current onchain state.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: — (there are descriptions in the whitepaper, but without quick onchain verification).
- Treasury: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: the project team; governance as a process is not described.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: public social media (X/Telegram) and news on the website.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: typical metaverse/NFT risks: contract vulnerabilities, risks of centralized platform control, token liquidity risks.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: public website + whitepaper; onchain token on Polygon.
- Key releases/milestones: the whitepaper is dated 2022‑12‑09 and contains a 2022–2023 roadmap.
- Roadmap: in the whitepaper (PDF) and on the website’s whitepaper page.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: DEX/listings and wallets (in the whitepaper/CMC profile; detailed technical integrations are not described).
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: as a metaverse platform and marketplace per the project’s claim; actual usage metrics are not provided.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? The whitepaper mentions the use of AI to improve the experience (e.g., recommendations in shopping scenarios), and the website uses “AI powered” positioning; no verifiable AI architecture/demo was found.
- What is truly onchain? The DEOD token (ERC‑20 on Polygon) and NFT assets/land (claimed as ERC‑721/1155 in the whitepaper).
- Why is a token needed? For settlements in the marketplace and LAND/NFT purchases (per the whitepaper).
- Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (AI as marketing), a high share of offchain parts (the metaverse), absence of public audits in links_*.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low‑medium | 1 |
| Onchain necessity | medium | 2 |
| Token necessity | low‑medium | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 1 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the project is positioned as “AI powered” and the whitepaper mentions AI recommendations for shopping cases.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/ ; https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): this confirms an intent/mention of AI, but does not prove an implemented AI module.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): specific AI functions are described in general terms (e.g., recommendations), without architecture/parameters/models.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a technical description and reproducible details, it cannot be counted as “actually working AI”.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no public Tier‑1 AI demo (one that shows an AI function) was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website shows product pages but does not provide a verifiable AI demo.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —.
- Context (version/date/how measured): —.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): quality metrics for the AI part are not provided.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the whitepaper describes the metaverse/economy/NFT, but does not contain an AI architecture.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no technical description of AI modules.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Polygon
- Addresses/identifiers: DEOD token: 0xE77aBB1E75D2913B2076DD16049992FFeACa5235
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://polygonscan.com/token/0xE77aBB1E75D2913B2076DD16049992FFeACa5235
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain contract page records the token address and the network.
- Conflict note (if any): Polygonscan could not be downloaded during the check (unavailable per the available sources), but the link is kept as the onchain SSOT.
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 1
- What useful logic is onchain: issuance/accounting of NFT assets and LAND (ERC‑721/1155), trading via the marketplace (per the whitepaper).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper explicitly describes an onchain model of asset ownership/trading.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: the metaverse can be implemented in a centralized way; without the blockchain, verifiable ownership/portability of assets and onchain trading are lost.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the blockchain is important for ownership/trading, but is not proven to be critically necessary for the core VR experience.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a utility token, DEOD.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): DEOD is listed as the platform’s native currency.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the DEOD token is used for buying/selling LAND and NFT assets via the marketplace.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper explicitly describes DEOD as an in‑world currency and a means of payment.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the whitepaper has no verifiable staking/slashing parameters; the descriptions of incentives are rather product‑level.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without mechanism parameters and contracts, this cannot be counted as a proven incentive mechanism.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): governance is mentioned in general terms, but without a description of the mechanics/voting with the token.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no verifiable description of a governance process.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): as a means of payment, the token is conceptually replaceable (stablecoin/fiat) if asset ownership is kept onchain.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper describes DEOD as a currency, but does not prove the unique irreplaceability of the token for the core function of NFT/LAND ownership.
- Conflict note (if any): none.
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://www.decentrawood.com/assets/pdf/WhitePaper.pdf | Description of the metaverse platform, the role of DEOD, LAND/NFT and the claimed technological part (IPFS, ERC‑721/1155). |
| Tier‑1 | https://polygonscan.com/token/0xE77aBB1E75D2913B2076DD16049992FFeACa5235 | Onchain page of the DEOD contract (could not be loaded during the check; SSOT link). |
| Tier‑1 | https://www.decentrawood.com/ | Product positioning (metaverse + “AI powered” marketing). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/decentrawood/ | Aggregator: reference profile and navigation links. |
No comments to display
No comments to display