AI Virtual Agents

AI Virtual Agents — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

AI Virtual Agents — an AI/Agents project on the Solana network, token (symbol: —).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: an AI platform (assistant/agents) for DeFi tasks: swaps, portfolio, interaction with DeFi protocols (per the description on the official website).
Who it’s for: DeFi users who need an assistant for working with swaps/a portfolio and basic automation.
Why onchain/token: the product is geared toward interaction with DeFi on the Solana network; the onchain fact of the token on Solana is confirmed. The token utility (exactly how it is mandatory in the product) is not established per Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

The user does: uses the project’s web interface/assistant (per the description on the website).
The system does: provides AI suggestions/analytics and helps perform DeFi actions (for example, a swap via integration with Jupiter API — claimed on the website).
The user gets: a simplified workflow for DeFi operations on Solana (per the description on the website).
Where the blockchain is: operation as “built on Solana” is claimed; the onchain fact of the token is confirmed by the explorer.
Token role (if any): not established per Tier‑1 (other than the tokenomics parameters published on the website).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	AI Virtual Agents
Also known as (aliases)	—
Logo (logo)	../assets/856_ai-virtual-agents_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker)	AIVIA
Category	AI/Agents
Primary chain (chain)	Solana
Type	non-EVM
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date)	—
Project status (status)	active
Token (standard)	SPL
Token contract	4ptXaGHy4CcCBfr5SPQZK5bcH9N4njv4LCf1RaJqpump
Token model (token_type)	—
Max supply	100 000 000 000 AIVIA
Issuance	—
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief)	public 95%; private 5% (per the description on the website)
Governance	—
Admins/keys	—
Audit	—
Bug bounty	—
Team (team)	—
Funding (investors/funding)	—
AI component (ai_component)	AI assistant/agents for DeFi operations
Use‑case (use_case)	AI assistant for swaps/portfolios in DeFi (Solana)
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	1/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary	ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 0
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	https://aivirtualagents.ai/
Docs	—
GitHub	—
Releases / Changelog	—
Whitepaper	https://aivirtualagents.ai/assets/pdf/AI_AGENT.pdf
Roadmap	https://aivirtualagents.ai/
Security advisories	—
Explorer	https://solscan.io/token/4ptXaGHy4CcCBfr5SPQZK5bcH9N4njv4LCf1RaJqpump
X	https://twitter.com/aivirtualagents
Discord	—
Telegram	https://t.me/aivirtualagents
Medium	—
Audit report(s)	—
Bug bounty	—
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/ai-virtual-agents
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ai-virtual-agents/

General project overview

According to the description on the official website, AI Virtual Agents is positioned as a DeFi AI platform/assistant “built on Solana” that automates/simplifies DeFi tasks (token swaps, portfolio, interaction with DeFi protocols) and claims integration with Jupiter API for swaps. No Tier‑1 confirmation of the product’s onchain logic “other than the token” (program/contract addresses, protocol specification) is recorded in this card.

Features/modules

AI DeFi assistant: assistance with DeFi queries and basic automation (per the description on the website).
Swaps via Jupiter API (claimed): assistance with performing swap operations (per the description on the website).
Portfolio management (claimed): portfolio management features (per the description on the website).

Typical scenarios

Scenario 1: a user uses the assistant for DeFi questions/analytics and performs a swap (as claimed on the website).
Scenario 2: a user tracks assets/a portfolio and receives suggestions (as claimed on the website).

Getting started (wallet/network)

What you need: access to the project’s web interface (Website) and a Solana wallet for DeFi operations (if used).
Network/chain: Solana.
Fees: Solana fees for operations with the token (if performed).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

Components: the SPL token on the Solana network.
Participant roles: — (not established).
Where logic runs: — (not established).
Dependencies: — (not established).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

Token utility: not established per Tier‑1.
Token parameters: see the passport for the mint/address; confirmed by the explorer link.

Governance

— (not established per Tier‑1).

Security and incidents

Audits: — (not established per Tier‑1).
Bug bounty: — (not established per Tier‑1).
Incidents: — (not established per Tier‑1).

Project status and timeline

Current status: active (based on the presence of the website and token; release/version details are not recorded).
Roadmap: published on the website (see links_* → Roadmap).

Ecosystem/integrations

Integrations: integration with Jupiter API is claimed (per the description on the website).
Partners: — (not established per Tier‑1).
Where it’s actually used: — (not established per Tier‑1).

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? per the description on the official website: an AI assistant/agents for DeFi solutions (analytics, automation).
What is truly onchain? the SPL token on the Solana network is confirmed.
Why is a token needed? the token utility is not established per Tier‑1 (other than the tokenomics parameters published on the website).
Red flags (based on the information found): no Tier‑1 proof of an AI component/product; Tier‑1 (docs/repo/releases/demo) is required to confirm the claims.

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 1/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis

Component	Level	Score
AI reality	low	1
Onchain necessity	low	1
Token necessity	low	0
Evidence	Tier‑1 partial	0

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): AI is described in Tier‑1 as an operating product/platform, not only as intent/roadmap.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aivirtualagents.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): This flag is needed only for “AI intent without evidence”; here there is a description of the product.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): The official website describes an AI assistant/agents for DeFi operations (swaps/portfolio/analytics).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aivirtualagents.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Tier‑1 description of the purpose and claimed features of the AI component at the product level.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): A public link to an app/demo confirming the operation of the product is not recorded in this card.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aivirtualagents.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website has marketing descriptions and a “Launch Agent” button, but without a recorded demo/app URL we conservatively set 0.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: not found.
Context (version/date/how measured): —.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 metrics/benchmarks were found.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The technical architecture/versions of the AI model/protocol are not recorded per Tier‑1 in this card.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aivirtualagents.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website has a high‑level description and roadmap, but there is no sufficient technical specification/versions for AI_4=1.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: Solana
Addresses/identifiers: mint: 4ptXaGHy4CcCBfr5SPQZK5bcH9N4njv4LCf1RaJqpump
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/4ptXaGHy4CcCBfr5SPQZK5bcH9N4njv4LCf1RaJqpump
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain fact of the token is available in the explorer.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 0
What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 description of onchain logic “other than the token” was found.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 0
“Replace the blockchain” test: not established (conservatively 0).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The project has a token (mint on the Solana network).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/4ptXaGHy4CcCBfr5SPQZK5bcH9N4njv4LCf1RaJqpump
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Explorer confirms the existence of the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Utility as “payment for the service” is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of what the token is used to pay for.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Mechanics of incentives/collateral/penalties are not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of incentives/collateral/penalties.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The use of the token for governance is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of governance.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 argumentation “replaceable/irreplaceable”; we conservatively set 0.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://solscan.io/token/4ptXaGHy4CcCBfr5SPQZK5bcH9N4njv4LCf1RaJqpump	The existence of the token and mint on the Solana network.
Tier‑1	https://aivirtualagents.ai/	Official product description (AI DeFi assistant), claimed features and tokenomics (total supply, distribution).
Tier‑1	—	No Tier‑1 source for claim “token utility (why it is needed in the product)” was found.