Brain Frog
Brain Frog — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Brain Frog — a Meme project on Ethereum, token (symbol: BRAIN).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a token on the Ethereum network (per the explorer).
- Who it’s for: for token participants/holders (detailed use cases are not established per Tier‑1).
- Why onchain/token: the onchain token contract is confirmed; the token utility and AI component are not established per Tier‑1 sources.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: receives the token/transfers the token.
- The system does: transactions are recorded on the Ethereum network.
- The user gets: ownership/transfers of the token (onchain).
- Where the blockchain is: the token and transactions are onchain (Ethereum).
- Token role (if any): not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Brain Frog |
| Also known as (aliases) | $BRAIN |
| Logo (logo) | — |
| Token symbol (ticker) | BRAIN |
| Category | Meme |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x1010107b4757c915bc2f1ecd08c85d1bb0be92e0 |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | — |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 0 / 1 / 0 / 1 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://brain-frog.io/ |
| Docs | — |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x1010107b4757c915bc2f1ecd08c85d1bb0be92e0 |
| X | https://twitter.com/brainfrog_ai |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/BrainFrog_ai |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/brain-frog |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/brain-frog/ |
General project overview
Per the available data, this is an ERC‑20 token on the Ethereum network. No Tier‑1 confirmation that the project contains an AI component (what exactly the AI does, demos, metrics, a tech description) was found.
Features/modules
- Onchain token: an ERC‑20 contract (confirmed in the explorer).
- AI/product features: not established per Tier‑1.
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a holder sends/receives the token → the transaction is visible on Ethereum.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an EVM wallet.
- Network/chain: Ethereum.
- Fees: gas on the Ethereum network.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the ERC‑20 token contract.
- Where logic runs: onchain (Ethereum) — token transfers.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Tokenomics parameters: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: not established.
Security and incidents
- Audits: not found per Tier‑1.
- Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1.
- Incidents: not found per Tier‑1.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: active (the token exists onchain).
- Roadmap: not found per Tier‑1.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations/cases: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? Not established: no Tier‑1 sources explaining the AI component were found.
- What is truly onchain? An ERC‑20 token on Ethereum (address in the explorer).
- Why is a token needed? Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Red flags and what to double‑check:
- AI‑washing: no Tier‑1 description of the AI component (AI_0..AI_4=0).
- onchain‑washing: no confirmation of useful onchain logic other than the token (OC_2=0).
- token‑washing: no Tier‑1 description of the token utility was found.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 1 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 “AI intent/roadmap” was found.
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 source where AI is explicitly claimed as intent/roadmap.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): What exactly the AI does is not established.
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of AI features.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No demo/app for AI features was found per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 “what you can touch”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: not found per Tier‑1
- Context (version/date/how measured): not found per Tier‑1
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 quality metrics were found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No tech description of an AI component was found per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 technical docs/architecture/versions.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: 0x1010107b4757c915bc2f1ecd08c85d1bb0be92e0
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x1010107b4757c915bc2f1ecd08c85d1bb0be92e0
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is an onchain fact in the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token)
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of onchain logic other than the token was found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established (other than the token).
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 argument for blockchain criticality.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token (ERC‑20).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x1010107b4757c915bc2f1ecd08c85d1bb0be92e0
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is onchain confirmation of the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Utility as “payment for the service” is not established.
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 sources about the token utility were found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Token‑based incentives/collateral/penalties are not established.
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of incentive mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The governance mechanics of the token are not established.
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of governance.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability/irreplaceability of the token is not established.
- Evidence: —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Insufficient Tier‑1 data.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x1010107b4757c915bc2f1ecd08c85d1bb0be92e0 | Onchain fact: the token (contract) on Ethereum |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “the project contains an AI component” was found. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “why is a token needed (utility)” was found. |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/brain-frog/ | Reference token page (not proof of technology) |
No comments to display
No comments to display