Skip to main content

AION‑5100

AION‑5100 — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

AION‑5100 — a project that claims “Predictive Intelligence” and “intelligence markets / prediction layer” (per the website); network: Base, token (symbol: —).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a project about a “prediction layer / intelligence markets” (wording from the website).
  • Who it’s for: not established (Tier‑1).
  • Why onchain/token: the token/contract on Base is confirmed by the explorer; the necessity of the token in the protocol is not established.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  2. The system does: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  3. The user gets: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  4. Where the blockchain is: Base (the ERC‑20 token contract).
  5. Token role (if any): not established (no Tier‑1 description of the token utility was found).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name AION‑5100
Also known as (aliases) AION5100
Logo (logo) ../assets/464_aion-5100_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) —
Category AI/Other | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Base
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) L2 (Optimistic Rollup, Base on Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xfc48314ad4ad5bd36a84e8307b86a68a01d95d9c
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) predictive intelligence
Use‑case (use_case) prediction layer / markets
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 1/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 0 / 0
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

The AION5100 website contains the wording “Predictive Intelligence”, “DAO-Agentic layer” and “intelligence markets / prediction layer”. The technical architecture, demo, metrics and specific user scenarios are not established per Tier‑1.

Features/modules

  • Token/contract on the Base network (see Explorer).
  • The external resource future.fun as a product surface (the link is in links_*).
  • The remaining components — not established (Tier‑1).

Typical scenarios

  • Use cases: not established (no Tier‑1 found).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: — (not established).
  • Network/chain: Base.
  • Fees: Base network fees (details not established).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the token contract on Base; the rest of the architecture — not established.
  • Participant roles: —.
  • Where logic runs: —.
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established (Tier‑1).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: —.
  • Who pays fees: —.
  • Where fees go: —.
  • Issuance/burn: —.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: —.
  • Treasury: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established (Tier‑1).
  • How protocol parameters change: not established (Tier‑1).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: X/Discord (links — in links_*).
  • Keys/multisig: not established (Tier‑1).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Bug bounty: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Incidents: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Threat model: no proof of working AI, a demo or metrics was found in Tier-1; the token utility is also not established.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (the website is available).
  • Key releases/milestones: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Roadmap: not established per Tier‑1.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not established (Tier‑1).
  • Partners: not established (Tier‑1).
  • Where it’s actually used: not established (Tier‑1).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Tier‑1 (the website) has claims about “Predictive Intelligence”, but without technical details/demo/metrics.
  • What is truly onchain? The token contract on Base.
  • Why is a token needed? Not established (Tier‑1).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): a lot of marketing wording without verifiable Tier‑1 artifacts; the token utility is not confirmed.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 1/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 partial 0
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The website claims “Predictive Intelligence” and a “prediction layer / intelligence markets”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aion5100.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is a Tier‑1 claim of intent, but without proof of a working AI component.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): What exactly the AI does (model/subsystem/output) — not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aion5100.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website has no tech description of an AI feature.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No demo/example of the AI component’s operation was found per Tier‑1 sources (there is no confirmed AI surface/flow).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 link to a product demo.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 metrics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The tech description/architecture/versions of the AI are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 tech docs/repository.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Base
  • Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0xfc48314ad4ad5bd36a84e8307b86a68a01d95d9c
  • Evidence: Tier‑2 — https://basescan.org/token/0xfc48314ad4ad5bd36a84e8307b86a68a01d95d9c
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The contract is given in links_* via the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the existence of the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of onchain logic.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: no justification of onchain criticality was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 statements.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): There is a token contract on Base (see Explorer).
  • Evidence: Tier‑2 — https://basescan.org/token/0xfc48314ad4ad5bd36a84e8307b86a68a01d95d9c
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Payment for the service with the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of TK_1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of TK_2.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance via the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of TK_3.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established (no Tier‑1 description of the token utility).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without Tier‑1 on token mechanics, replaceability cannot be strictly asserted.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://aion5100.ai/ The project’s claims (Predictive Intelligence / prediction layer).
Tier‑2 https://basescan.org/token/0xfc48314ad4ad5bd36a84e8307b86a68a01d95d9c Token contract on Base.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is a working AI component/demo/metrics” was found.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the token is needed for payment/incentives/governance” was found.

No comments to display

Back to top