Solaris AI

Solaris AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Solaris AI — AI agents and onchain workflow tools in the Solana ecosystem (per the project’s claim); token (symbol: SOLARIS).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: a set of Solaris AI products: AI agents for Web3 and claimed onchain workflow tools for Solana.
Who it’s for: teams/communities (agents for Telegram/assistants) and users who need agents/automation.
Why onchain/token: the onchain component is claimed as “on-chain workflows” on Solana; a specific necessity of the token in the protocol is not established.
What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): agents.solarisai.io (see links_*).

How it works (very briefly)

The user does: chooses/configures an AI agent (for example, for Telegram) or uses the agent interface.
The system does: responds as an agent and (per the project’s claim) can perform workflow actions in the Solana ecosystem.
The user gets: answers/task automation and interaction with the agent.
Where the blockchain is: Solana (token; “on-chain workflows” are claimed on the website, no Tier‑1 details found).
Token role (if any): not established (no Tier‑1 description of the token utility was found).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	Solaris AI
Also known as (aliases)	$SOLARIS
Logo (logo)	../assets/467_solaris-ai_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker)	SOLARIS
Category	AI/Agents \| Infra
Primary chain (chain)	Solana
Type	non-EVM
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date)	—
Project status (status)	active
Token (standard)	SPL
Token contract	8EZqVPJdEWt754S17nghfa4Y4jQJ7tigBwsGbo1Tpump
Token model (token_type)	—
Max supply	—
Issuance	—
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief)	—
Governance	—
Admins/keys	—
Audit	—
Bug bounty	—
Team (team)	—
Funding (investors/funding)	—
AI component (ai_component)	AI agents for Web3
Use‑case (use_case)	agents for Telegram / assistants
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary	2 / 1 / 0 / 1
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	https://www.solarisai.io
App / Demo	https://agents.solarisai.io/
Docs	https://docs.solarisai.fun/
GitHub	https://github.com/SolarisAI-Labs
Releases / Changelog	—
Whitepaper	https://docs.solarisai.fun/
Roadmap	—
Security advisories	—
Explorer	https://solscan.io/token/8EZqVPJdEWt754S17nghfa4Y4jQJ7tigBwsGbo1Tpump
X	https://twitter.com/SolarisAI_fun
Discord	—
Telegram	https://t.me/Solaris_Portal
Medium	—
Audit report(s)	—
Bug bounty	—
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/solaris-ai-2
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/solaris-ai/

General project overview

On its website, Solaris AI describes an ecosystem: AI Agents (status “Live”), as well as claimed blocks for workflow automation and entertainment (some are marked “Coming Soon”). The page also lists the contract address of the $SOLARIS token on the Solana network.

Features/modules

Solaris AI Agents: a product block with a link to agents.solarisai.io.
Solaris AI Flow / Live: claimed on the website as “coming soon” (details are not established per Tier‑1).
The $SOLARIS token (mint listed on the website).

Typical scenarios

Team/brand: configures an agent for a “brand voice” → gets an agent for communicating with the audience.
User: uses the agent as a personal assistant → gets answers/help.
Developer: uses the claimed workflow components → details not established per Tier‑1.

Getting started (wallet/network)

What you need: open agents.solarisai.io (see links_*).
Network/chain: Solana.
Fees: not established (Tier‑1).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

Components: agent interface (web), token mint on Solana; other subsystems are described at the level of claims.
Participant roles: users/teams (clients), developers/operators (not established in more detail).
Where logic runs: agent responses — offchain; “on-chain workflows” are claimed, but without tech details per Tier‑1.
Dependencies: not established (Tier‑1).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

Token utility: not established (Tier‑1).
Protocol necessity drivers: —.
Who pays fees: —.
Where fees go: —.
Issuance/burn: —.
Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
Distribution and token issuance schedule: —.
Treasury: —.

Governance

Who makes decisions: not established (Tier‑1).
How protocol parameters change: not established (Tier‑1).
Where decisions are discussed/made: GitHub/X/Telegram (links — in links_*).
Keys/multisig: not established (Tier‑1).

Security and incidents

Audits: not established per Tier‑1.
Bug bounty: not established per Tier‑1.
Incidents: not established per Tier‑1.
Threat model: many claims without tech docs/metrics; the token utility is not confirmed by Tier‑1 artifacts.

Project status and timeline

Current status: active (there is an “Agents” component with the status “Live”).
Key releases/milestones: not established per Tier‑1.
Roadmap: not established per Tier‑1.

Ecosystem/integrations

Integrations: the Solana ecosystem; X/Telegram channels (integration details are not established per Tier‑1).
Partners: not established (Tier‑1).
Where it’s actually used: not established (Tier‑1).

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? The website claims a “Solaris AI Agents” product and scenarios (agents for Telegram/assistants, memory, multimodality — as claims).
What is truly onchain? The token mint on Solana; “on-chain workflows” are claimed, but no technical confirmation (contracts/docs) was found per Tier‑1.
Why is a token needed? Not established (Tier‑1).
Red flags (based on the information found): a significant part of the description consists of marketing claims without Tier‑1 tech docs/metrics; the token utility is not confirmed.

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis

Component	Level	Score
AI reality	medium	2
Onchain necessity	low	1
Token necessity	low	0
Evidence	Tier‑1 present (AI), onchain partially	1

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): There is a description of the AI Agents product and a link to a live component, so “intent only” is not singled out.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.solarisai.io
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website has descriptions and a linked “Agents” component.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): “Solaris AI Agents”: AI agents for Web3 (for example, Telegram bots as AI agents/assistants).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.solarisai.io
Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the “Agents” product and its purpose.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): There is a link to agents.solarisai.io as a “Status: Live” component.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.solarisai.io
Why sufficient / why not (one line): A link to the product component is present on the Tier‑1 page.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: not established per Tier‑1.
Context (version/date/how measured): —.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 quality metrics/benchmarks.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The tech description/architecture/model versions are not established (links_* contains no confirmed Tier‑1 technical documentation covering the architecture/versions).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): No sufficient Tier‑1 tech doc/architecture.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: Solana
Addresses/identifiers: token mint 8EZqVPJdEWt754S17nghfa4Y4jQJ7tigBwsGbo1Tpump
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.solarisai.io ; Tier‑2 — https://solscan.io/token/8EZqVPJdEWt754S17nghfa4Y4jQJ7tigBwsGbo1Tpump
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The contract address is listed on the official page and duplicated by the explorer.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 0
What useful logic is onchain: “on-chain workflows” are claimed, but without verifiable details (contracts/addresses/docs) per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.solarisai.io
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a claim, but no artifacts at the level of “what logic is onchain”.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 0
“Replace the blockchain” test: no justification of onchain criticality was found in Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.solarisai.io
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no wording “without the blockchain the product breaks down”.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The website lists the $SOLARIS token and its mint address.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.solarisai.io
Why sufficient / why not (one line): A Tier‑1 source indicates the existence of the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Payment for the service with the token is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of payment with the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Mechanics of incentives/collateral/penalties are not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of TK_2.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Governance via the token is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of TK_3.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established (no Tier‑1 description of the token utility).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without Tier‑1 on token mechanics, replaceability cannot be strictly asserted.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://www.solarisai.io	Description of the ecosystem, link to Agents, $SOLARIS mint address.
Tier‑1	https://agents.solarisai.io/	What you can touch: the Agents component (Status: Live).
Tier‑2	https://solscan.io/token/8EZqVPJdEWt754S17nghfa4Y4jQJ7tigBwsGbo1Tpump	The token on the Solana network (mint address).
Tier‑1	—	No Tier‑1 source for claim “the token is needed for payment/incentives/governance in the protocol” was found.