Aion
Aion — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Aion — an Infra project (L1/infrastructure), token (symbol: AION).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a blockchain project/network (infrastructure), with its own network and explorer.
- Who it’s for: users and developers who use the Aion network/tools.
- Why onchain/token: onchain is the network itself; the role of the token in the protocol is not detailed in this card (conservatively).
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: performs transactions and uses the network’s applications/tools.
- The system does: validates and records the state/history of operations in the network.
- The user gets: confirmed transactions and the onchain state.
- Where the blockchain is: the core logic is onchain in the Aion network (see Explorer).
- Token role (if any): the token exists; Tier‑1 sources describe staking and the compensation of participants via block rewards and transaction fees (see Evidence).
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Aion |
| Also known as (aliases) | Aion Network; AION |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/479_aion_logo.png |
| Token symbol (ticker) | AION |
| Category | Infra |
| Primary chain (chain) | Aion |
| Type | Appchain |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | — |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | native |
| Token contract | — |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | AION is the native coin of the network; Tier‑1 sources describe issuance and staking (Unity economics), but the parameters are not recorded in the passport without a separate Tier‑1 tokenomics summary. |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | yes |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | L1 infrastructure |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 0 / onchain_score 3 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://theoan.com/ |
| Docs | https://docs-aion.theoan.com/docs/staking |
| GitHub | https://github.com/aionnetwork |
| Releases / Changelog | https://github.com/aionnetwork/Desktop-Wallet/releases |
| Whitepaper | https://theoan.com/whitepaper |
| Roadmap | https://aion.theoan.com/ |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://mainnet.aion.network |
| App / Demo | — |
| X | https://twitter.com/Aion_OAN |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/aion_blockchain |
| Medium | https://aion-network.medium.com/ |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | https://github.com/titan-suite/bounties |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/aion |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aion/ |
General project overview
Aion is an infrastructure blockchain project with its own network (based on the presence of an explorer) and a set of public materials (whitepaper/documentation/repositories). In the context of DecAIHub, an important clarification: no Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found, so DecAI Fit is recorded as 0/6 with ai_score=0 per the SSOT rule.
Features/modules
- Explorer (Tier‑1): the presence of a working network/onchain state via the explorer.
- Documentation/whitepaper (Tier‑1): the project’s basic materials for developers.
- Public repositories (Tier‑1): the project’s GitHub organization.
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user checks the state/transactions in the Aion network explorer.
- Scenario 2: a developer studies the whitepaper/docs and repositories → assesses how to work with the network/tools.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: you can start with the documentation/whitepaper (see links_*); to view onchain data — the explorer.
- Network/chain: Aion mainnet.
- Fees: network fees apply to onchain operations (if you perform them); not calculated in this card.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: network/nodes, clients/wallets, developer tools (per the repositories); the detailed architecture is not extracted per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- Participant roles: users, developers, operators of the network infrastructure.
- Where logic runs: the core logic is onchain in the Aion network.
- Dependencies: the network infrastructure and developer tools (not detailed).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: AION is the native coin of the network; Tier‑1 sources describe the compensation of participants via block rewards and transaction fees, as well as staking for security (see Evidence).
- Protocol necessity drivers: for an L1 network, the token/coin is used as the economic mechanism of the network (fees/rewards/staking) per Tier‑1.
- Who pays fees: network users (general principle of an L1; without specific parameters).
- Where fees go: per the Tier‑1 source, transaction fees are part of the compensation of Miners/Validators (the details of the distribution are not recorded in this card).
- Issuance/burn: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- Security/incentive mechanisms: staking is described in Tier‑1 (see Evidence).
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- Treasury: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
Governance
- Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- How protocol parameters change: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card); the reference point for changes is the releases/repositories.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card); the public channels are the repositories/social media (see links_*).
- Keys/multisig: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
Security and incidents
- Audits: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- Bug bounty: a link to the bug bounty is in links_* (the contents are not analyzed in this card).
- Incidents: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- Threat model: typical risks of an L1 network/clients; requires separate verification.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: mainnet (there is an explorer).
- Key releases/milestones: the reference point is GitHub Releases (see links_*).
- Roadmap: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card; see website).
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- Partners: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1 (in this card).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? no confirmation of an AI component was found per Tier‑1 sources.
- What is truly onchain? the Aion network and its state/transactions (see Explorer).
- Why is a token needed? the network’s native token exists; Tier‑1 sources describe issuance/rewards and staking, as well as the role of fees (see Evidence).
- Red flags (based on the information found): conflating an infrastructure L1 project with AI narratives without Tier‑1 proof.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | high | 3 |
| Token necessity | low | 2 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 claim about AI intent/applicability was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without an explicit Tier‑1 mention of AI as intent we set 0 (conservatively).
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Not established: an AI feature as part of the product/protocol.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of an AI component.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 AI demo artifacts were found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_2=1 requires a specific demo surface.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI metrics/benchmarks were not found per Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No AI tech description as a separate component was found per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires a specific tech context of the AI part.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Aion
- Addresses/identifiers: — (in this card we record the presence of the network/explorer)
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://mainnet.aion.network
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The presence of an explorer confirms the existence of the network and of the onchain state.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 1
- What useful logic is onchain: the network/transactions/state and the protocol rules (L1).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://theoan.com/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper describes a network/protocol, not only a “token”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 1
- “Replace the blockchain” test: without onchain, the network ceases to be a blockchain protocol (the public verifiability of state/transactions breaks down).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://theoan.com/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): For an L1 network, the blockchain is the core of the product.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The network has a native token, AION.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://theoan.com/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper refers to the network’s token/coin.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): A Tier‑1 source describes transaction fees as part of the compensation of network participants (i.e., the token is used as “payment for network operations”).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aion.theoan.com/EconomicsPaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): For an L1 network, fees are the basic pay‑for‑service signal, confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): Tier‑1 docs describe staking (including delegation to pools) and rewards for participation.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs-aion.theoan.com/docs/staking
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is a Tier‑1 description of incentives (staking/rewards) in the network’s economy.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No governance mechanism via the AION token was found per Tier‑1 (in this card).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit governance mechanism and a source.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token has not been assessed (there is no sufficient Tier‑1 description of the token’s role in the mechanics).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Data on the token’s role in the protocol are needed to draw a conclusion about replaceability.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://theoan.com/whitepaper | Tier‑1 description of the network/protocol and the AION token (OC_2/OC_3/TK_0). |
| Tier‑1 | https://aion.theoan.com/EconomicsPaper | Tier‑1: issuance/compensation (block rewards + transaction fees) and the context of Unity economics (TK_1). |
| Tier‑1 | https://docs-aion.theoan.com/docs/staking | Tier‑1: staking/delegation and rewards (TK_2). |
| Tier‑1 | https://mainnet.aion.network | Onchain fact: the presence of a working network/explorer (OC_1). |
| Tier‑1 | https://github.com/aionnetwork | The project’s public repositories (development artifact). |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “what is real AI here” was found. |
| Tier‑2 | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/aion | Reference profile (context). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aion/ | Reference profile (context). |
No comments to display
No comments to display