Skip to main content

Metafluence

Metafluence — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Metafluence — a Metaverse/SocialFi project on the BNB Smart Chain network, token (symbol: METO).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a metaverse platform for influencers/brands/audiences (virtual spaces/events/NFTs).
  • Who it’s for: influencers, brands and their audiences (per the description on the website).
  • Why onchain/token: METO is claimed as the “native currency” of the ecosystem for purchases/transactions and activities on the platform.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: uses the features of the metaverse platform (properties/events/assets).
  2. The system does: provides a web interface and related functionality (the details of the mechanics are not established per Tier‑1 sources).
  3. The user gets: participation/content/assets in the metaverse environment.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the onchain METO token on the BNB Smart Chain network is recorded (contract in links_*).
  5. Token role: the currency of the ecosystem for purchases/transactions and activities (per the website).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Metafluence
Also known as (aliases) METO
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) METO
Category Metaverse | SocialFi
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0xa78775bba7a542f291e5ef7f13c6204e704a90ba
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) METO is claimed as the currency of the ecosystem for purchases/transactions and activities on the platform.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) metaverse platform (influencers + brands)
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the description on the official website, Metafluence positions itself as an “influencer‑driven metaverse”, where participants interact with virtual objects/spaces and digital assets. The website also states that the METO token is the “native currency” of the ecosystem.

Features/modules

  • Metaverse spaces: virtual properties/rooms (per the website).
  • Marketplace/assets: NFTs/digital assets and transactions (per the website).
  • Staking: the website has staking sections (the terms are not verified per Tier‑1 sources).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user participates in metaverse activities → gets access/assets/content.
  • Scenario 2: a participant uses METO for transactions in the ecosystem (per the claim on the website).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to the project’s website/platform; a wallet for BNB Smart Chain (if onchain operations are used).
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain.
  • Fees: BNB Smart Chain fees for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: web platform + METO token (BEP‑20) on BNB Smart Chain; the details of the platform’s contracts/architecture are not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Participant roles: users/creators/brands (per the website’s positioning).
  • Where logic runs: not established per Tier‑1 sources (which part is onchain, other than the token).
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: METO is claimed as the currency of the ecosystem for purchases/transactions and activities.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: a detailed onchain necessity (other than the “currency”) is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Issuance/burn: —.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: — (staking is mentioned, but the terms are not verified per Tier‑1 sources).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: —.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: the risks relate to the web platform and the token contract; public reports/disclosure and admin rights parameters are needed.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the website states “Alpha testing is live” (the access terms require separate verification).
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: see the roadmap in links_*.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: —.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? per Tier‑1 (official website/docs), no AI component is identified.
  • What is truly onchain? there is a METO token on the BNB Smart Chain network (contract and explorer in links_*).
  • Why is a token needed? on the website, METO is described as the currency of the ecosystem for purchases/transactions and activities.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): if the project is positioned as an AI project in other sources, this requires Tier‑1 confirmation; onchain logic other than the token is not recorded.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality absent 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 partial 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 mention of AI as intent was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI does not appear in the product description on the official website.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of AI functionality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): An AI demo is not applicable (AI_1=0).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No AI component is identified.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Not applicable (the AI component is not established).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Not applicable (the AI component is not established).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): —.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0xa78775bba7a542f291e5ef7f13c6204e704a90ba
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xa78775bba7a542F291e5ef7f13C6204E704A90Ba
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is an onchain token contract and an explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Other than the token, the product’s onchain logic is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 argument for onchain criticality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, METO (BEP‑20), on the BNB Smart Chain network.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xa78775bba7a542F291e5ef7f13C6204E704A90Ba ; https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract and the mention of the token on the website confirm its existence.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): METO is claimed as the currency of the ecosystem for purchases/transactions and activities on the platform.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website states that METO is the “native currency” of the ecosystem and lists the use cases.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties in METO are not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Per Tier‑1 sources, there is no precise description of the incentive/collateral mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A governance role of the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 description of governance mechanics was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://metafluence.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): A conclusion about replaceability requires a Tier‑1 argument/protocol rule.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://metafluence.com Description of the product as a metaverse platform and the statement about the role of METO as the currency of the ecosystem.
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0xa78775bba7a542F291e5ef7f13C6204E704A90Ba Onchain contract of the METO token on the BNB Smart Chain network.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the project’s AI component (AI_0/AI_1)” was found.