Skip to main content

CodeX (CodeXchain)

CodeX (CodeXchain) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

CodeX — an AI/Agents | Infra project on the BNB Smart Chain network, token (symbol: CDX).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a “no‑code AI” platform that claims AI agent creation/marketplace and no‑code tools for Web3 (token/NFT generators, etc.).
  • Who it’s for: non‑developer users and teams who need AI tools and a “builder” approach for Web3.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is confirmed for the CDX token (BEP‑20, BNB Smart Chain); the rest of the product’s protocol onchain logic is not established per the available sources.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): a set of dApp pages on codexchain.xyz and the Telegram bot @codex_ai_tg_bot (link on the website).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: chooses a tool (for example, AI agent creation / Scan2Code / token generator / Telegram bot).
  2. The system does: generates/helps assemble components (code/agents/contracts) via AI tools and interfaces.
  3. The user gets: the tool’s output (artifacts/templates/contracts/agents) within the claimed modules.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the confirmed onchain layer is the CDX token (BNB Smart Chain).
  5. Token role: the role of CDX (payment/access/incentives) is not established per the available sources.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name CodeX (CodeXchain)
Also known as (aliases) CDX
Logo (logo) ../assets/569_codexchain_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) CDX
Category AI/Agents | Infra
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x1c3ba6cf2676cc795db02a3b2093e5076f5f330e
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 1,000,000,000 CDX (max total supply)
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) no-code tools for AI agents
Use‑case (use_case) no-code Web3 app building
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 0
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

On its official website, CodeX describes itself as a no‑code, AI‑driven ecosystem for Web3: AI agent creation, agent marketplace/monetization, Scan2Code, “architect” tools and token/NFT generators. The website also lists a link to the Telegram bot and several web dApp pages.

Per the available sources, the confirmed onchain layer is the CDX token on the BNB Smart Chain network (contract and supply via BscScan). The product’s protocol onchain logic (agent/marketplace contracts) is not established per the available sources.

Features/modules

  • AI Agents Creation / Marketplace / Monetization: claimed modules for creating and trading AI agents.
  • No‑code App Builder: a claimed application builder.
  • Telegram AI tools: claimed access to the tools via a Telegram bot.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: the user creates an AI agent or generates a component via the web dApp → receives the resulting artifacts.
  • Scenario 2: the user uses the Telegram bot → gets access to AI tools via a chat interface.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to the website/bot; for onchain operations — an EVM wallet.
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain (for the CDX token).
  • Fees: BNB Smart Chain gas for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: web dApp/Telegram interfaces + the CDX token onchain; architecture details are not established.
  • Participant roles: platform users/token holders.
  • Where logic runs: AI tools — offchain; the token — onchain.
  • Dependencies: BNB Smart Chain EVM infrastructure; Telegram.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: — (not established per the available sources).
  • Who pays fees: BNB Smart Chain gas.
  • Issuance/burn: max total supply is given in BscScan.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not established).
  • How protocol parameters change: — (not established).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: — (not established).
  • Keys/multisig: — (not established).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (not found per the available sources).
  • Bug bounty: — (not found).
  • Incidents: — (not established).
  • Threat model: risks of offchain services and the token; details are not established.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: mainnet
  • Key releases/milestones: — (not found)
  • Roadmap: — (not found)

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: Telegram (bot), EVM tooling (per the products).
  • Partners: — (not established)
  • Where it’s actually used: — (not established)

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The website describes a set of AI tools (AI agents, Scan2Code, prompt‑based component generation) and a Telegram interface to the AI tools.
  • What is truly onchain? the CDX token on BNB Smart Chain is confirmed.
  • Why is a token needed? the role of the token for access/payment/incentives is not confirmed per the available sources.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing — absence of Tier‑1 technical artifacts (code/metrics) for the AI modules; onchain‑washing — if “Web3” boils down to the token without protocol logic.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 0
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is described as platform functionality (tools), not only as intent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://codexchain.xyz
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): given the description of the modules, we use AI_1/AI_2.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the AI modules help create AI agents and generate artifacts (code/contracts) via no‑code interfaces.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://codexchain.xyz
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website lists the modules (AI Agents, Scan2Code, Architect, etc.).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): there are links to dApp pages and a Telegram bot for using the AI tools.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://codexchain.xyz ; https://t.me/codex_ai_tg_bot
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): links to the tools/bot are published on the official website.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: — (not found)
  • Context (version/date/how measured): — (not found)
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://codexchain.xyz
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no quantitative quality metrics for the AI modules in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no tech description of the AI architecture/versions was found per the available sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://codexchain.xyz
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a description of the modules, but no architecture/model versions.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: CDX token (0x1c3ba6cf2676cc795db02a3b2093e5076f5f330e)
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x1c3ba6cF2676cc795db02a3b2093E5076f5F330E
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain explorer confirms the contract and max total supply.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no Tier‑1 addresses/code of the product’s protocol logic.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not confirmed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, CDX.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x1c3ba6cF2676cc795db02a3b2093E5076f5F330E
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the payment role of the token is not established per the available sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no Tier‑1 payment mechanics via the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentives/staking/penalties via the token are not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the governance role is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no Tier‑1 artifacts.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 replaceability test.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://codexchain.xyz Description of the AI/no‑code modules (AI agents, Scan2Code, Architect, token/NFT generators) and links to the tools/bot.
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x1c3ba6cF2676cc795db02a3b2093E5076f5F330E CDX token contract (BEP‑20) + max total supply.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is an onchain protocol/product contracts beyond the token” was found.
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/codexchain/ Profile (for reference; not Tier‑1).

No comments to display

Back to top