Skip to main content

Kizuna

Kizuna — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Kizuna — an AI/Agents | Meme project on the Ethereum network, token (symbol: KIZUNA).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a token project that promotes “decentralized AI prompting” via interfaces to Bittensor Subnets (KizunaTensor).
  • Who it’s for: community members who need generative content (text/images) via a bot/interface.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain — issuance and accounting of the KIZUNA token (ERC‑20, Ethereum); the role of the token as a mandatory component of the product is not established per Tier‑1.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): KizunaTensor (website/Telegram bot) as an interface to text/image generation.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: sends a prompt via KizunaTensor (website/bot).
  2. The system does: proxies the requests to Bittensor Subnets (per the project’s description) for text/image generation.
  3. The user gets: the generated result (text/image).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the onchain component confirmed by Tier‑1 is the KIZUNA token on the Ethereum network.
  5. Token role: the utility/necessity of the token for the operation of KizunaTensor is not established per the available sources.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Kizuna
Also known as (aliases) KIZUNA, KizunaTensor
Logo (logo) ../assets/563_kizuna_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) KIZUNA
Category AI/Agents | Meme
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x470c8950c0c3aa4b09654bc73b004615119a44b5
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 1,000,000,000,000,000 KIZUNA (max total supply)
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) prompting interface for Bittensor subnets (text/image)
Use‑case (use_case) content generation via bot/interface
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Kizuna is a token project on Ethereum that, in Tier‑1 (the official website), describes an additional “AI layer”, KizunaTensor: an interface/bot for generating text and images using Bittensor Subnets. At the same time, no description of a separate onchain protocol, other than the token itself and the related transactions/pages, was found in the available Tier‑1 sources.

From the standpoint of verifiability of the AI thesis: there is a Tier‑1 description of “what the AI does” (content generation via an interface to Bittensor), but there are no Tier‑1 quality metrics/benchmarks and no Tier‑1 technical documentation on the architecture of the AI part (at the level of models/versions/components).

Features/modules

  • KizunaTensor: “AI‑powered” text/image generation via an interface to Bittensor Subnets (per the description on the website).
  • KIZUNA token (ERC‑20): onchain accounting of token ownership on the Ethereum network.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user writes a prompt in KizunaTensor → receives generated text/an image.
  • Scenario 2: a community member interacts with the token (transfer/DEX operations) → onchain accounting on Ethereum.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet (for onchain operations) and access to KizunaTensor (web/bot).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum mainnet.
  • Fees: Ethereum gas for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the ERC‑20 contract of the KIZUNA token; offchain KizunaTensor interfaces (website/bot).
  • Participant roles: token holders, users of the bot/interface.
  • Where logic runs: the token — onchain (Ethereum); content generation — offchain, via integration with Bittensor Subnets (per the description on the website).
  • Dependencies: Ethereum (onchain); Bittensor Subnets (for AI generation, per the project’s description).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: — (not established per the available sources).
  • Who pays fees: users pay Ethereum gas for onchain operations.
  • Issuance/burn: max total supply is given in the onchain profile of the token; details of issuance/burn as a protocol mechanic are not established per the available sources.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not established per the available sources).
  • How protocol parameters change: — (not established per the available sources).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: — (not established per the available sources).
  • Keys/multisig: — (not established per the available sources).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (not found per the available sources).
  • Bug bounty: — (not found per the available sources).
  • Incidents: — (not established per the available sources).
  • Threat model: risks of the token smart contract and risks of the offchain service/integration (bot/interface); details not established.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: mainnet
  • Key releases/milestones: — (not found per the available sources)
  • Roadmap: — (not found per the available sources)

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: Bittensor Subnets (for content generation, per the project’s description).
  • Partners: — (not established per the available sources)
  • Where it’s actually used: — (not established per the available sources)

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? KizunaTensor is claimed as an interface to text/image generation via Bittensor Subnets (decentralized “AI mining” incentive programs).
  • What is truly onchain? the KIZUNA token (ERC‑20) and onchain accounting of ownership/transactions on the Ethereum network.
  • Why is a token needed? the necessity of the token for access to KizunaTensor is not established; per the available sources, only the role of the token as an onchain asset is confirmed.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing — absence of Tier‑1 metrics/architecture of the AI part; onchain‑washing — if “decentralization” boils down to the token without protocol logic; token‑washing — claims about utility without a verifiable onchain mechanic.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is described as functionality (KizunaTensor), not only as intent/roadmap.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): given the description of a specific AI feature, we use AI_1/AI_2 instead of AI_0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): text and image generation via an interface to Bittensor Subnets (KizunaTensor).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the official website describes the text/image generation functionality via KizunaTensor.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the KizunaTensor interface for prompting (text/image) is available, including the website and a link to the Telegram bot.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatensor.com/ ; https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is Tier‑1 “what you can touch” (website/bot surface) for the claimed AI feature.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: — (not found)
  • Context (version/date/how measured): — (not found)
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no quantitative quality metrics of generation/models were found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no tech description of the AI component (versions/architecture of the model/subsystems) was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no architecture/model versions in Tier‑1 sources; only the interface/positioning is described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: the KIZUNA token (0x470c8950c0c3aa4b09654bc73b004615119a44b5)
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x470c8950c0c3aa4b09654bc73b004615119a44b5
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the address and metadata of the token are available in a public onchain explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (per the available sources).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 artifact confirming onchain logic of the product beyond the token was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality for the AI part (KizunaTensor) or for the product as a whole was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an explicit justification of “what breaks down without the blockchain” we set 0 (conservatively).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, KIZUNA (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x470c8950c0c3aa4b09654bc73b004615119a44b5
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token contract is listed in the onchain explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation was found that KIZUNA is used as payment for the service.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website describes “white label bot” packages priced in ETH; the role of KIZUNA as payment is not confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not established per the available sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of onchain incentives/staking/slashing via the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the use of the token for governance is not established per the available sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no Tier‑1 artifacts (docs/votes/process) confirming a governance role.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established per the available sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://kizunatoken.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 description of the token mechanics, replaceability/irreplaceability cannot be confidently asserted.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://kizunatoken.io/ Tier‑1 description of KizunaTensor: text/image generation via an interface to Bittensor Subnets; links to the service/bot are given.
Tier‑1 https://kizunatensor.com/ “What you can touch”: the KizunaTensor web interface (demo surface).
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x470c8950c0c3aa4b09654bc73b004615119a44b5 The KIZUNA token contract (ERC‑20) on the Ethereum network + max total supply.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “there are quality metrics/benchmarks of the AI part” was found.
Tier‑1 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kizunabuilders/kizuna-token/main/MANIFESTO.md The project’s Manifesto (positioning/community values; not a tech doc).
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/kizuna Profile (for reference; not Tier‑1 evidence).

No comments to display

Back to top