EthereumFair

EthereumFair (ETHF) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

EthereumFair — an AI/Other | Infra project on EthereumFair, token (symbol: ETHF).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: a PoW fork of Ethereum, positioned as a separate EVM network with the native coin ETHF.
Who it’s for: users/developers of EVM applications and PoW miners.
Why onchain/token: the native coin is needed for network operations and miner rewards (PoW); the network — for smart contracts/EVM.

How it works (very briefly)

The user does: sends transactions/uses dApps on the EthereumFair network.
The system does: validates blocks via PoW and executes EVM contracts.
The user gets: confirmed transactions and smart contract execution.
Where the blockchain is: the key logic is onchain (EVM execution, network state).
Token role (if any): ETHF — the native coin of the network (network currency/PoW rewards).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	EthereumFair
Also known as (aliases)	ETHF \| ETF
Logo (logo)	—
Token symbol (ticker)	ETHF
Category	AI/Other \| Infra
Primary chain (chain)	Ethereum
Type	Appchain
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoW (Ethash)
Launch date (launch_date)	2022
Project status (status)	active
Token (standard)	native
Token contract	—
Token model (token_type)	utility (gas + staking)
Max supply	infinite (per the description in the documentation)
Issuance	inflationary (mining rewards; per the description)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief)	The native coin of the network; issuance via PoW mining; used for network operations and rewards.
Governance	—
Admins/keys	—
Audit	—
Bug bounty	—
Team (team)	—
Funding (investors/funding)	—
AI component (ai_component)	AI computing
Use‑case (use_case)	PoW EVM L1
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary	ai_score 1 / onchain_score 3 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 2
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	https://etherfair.org/
Docs	https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
GitHub	https://github.com/orgs/ethereumfair/repositories
Releases / Changelog	https://github.com/ethereumfair/go-ethereum/commits/master
Whitepaper	https://etherfair.org/whitepaper
Roadmap	https://etherfair.org/technology_roadmap
Security advisories	https://github.com/ethereumfair/go-ethereum/security
Explorer	https://www.oklink.com/ethf
X	https://twitter.com/EthereumFair
Discord	https://discord.com/invite/hJysvjSJGD
Telegram	https://t.me/ethereumfair_en
Medium	https://medium.com/@EthereumFair
Audit report(s)	—
Bug bounty	—
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/ethereumfair
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereumfair/

General project overview

EthereumFair describes itself as a PoW fork of Ethereum with its own network, smart contracts/EVM and the native coin ETHF. The documentation contains the wording about “AI computing power”, but no tech description of a specific AI component or its metrics was found per Tier‑1 — so we treat it as intent.

Features/modules

PoW consensus: the network supports mining (claimed).
EVM/smart contracts: compatibility with EVM and dApps is claimed.
Ecosystem/tools: the website contains links to an explorer, RPC and dApps.

Typical scenarios

Scenario 1: a user sends a transaction → gets confirmation and execution onchain.
Scenario 2: a miner runs PoW mining → receives ETHF rewards (claimed).

Getting started (wallet/network)

What you need: an EVM wallet with support for custom networks (for example, MetaMask).
Network/chain: EthereumFair (network parameters and RPC are mentioned in the documentation).
Fees: EthereumFair network fees (gas) in ETHF.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

Components: the EthereumFair L1 network, PoW miners, EVM execution, explorer/RPC.
Participant roles: users, dApp developers, miners.
Where logic runs: L1 (onchain).
Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

Token utility: ETHF is used as the network currency (gas) and as the reward for PoW miners (claimed).
Issuance: described as expandable via mining rewards.

Governance

Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1.
How protocol parameters change: —.

Security and incidents

Audits: —.
Bug bounty: —.
Incidents: —.
Threat model: typical PoW network risks (attacks on consensus) and dApp smart contract risks.

Project status and timeline

Current status: mainnet (per the official website/documentation).
Key releases/milestones: —.
Roadmap: https://etherfair.org/technology_roadmap

Ecosystem/integrations

Integrations: a list of dApps/bridges is given on the project website (see links_*).
Partners: —.
Where it’s actually used: —.

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? The whitepaper contains a thesis about “integrating AI computing power”, but without specifics — we treat it as intent.
What is truly onchain? The PoW network and EVM execution (L1).
Why is a token needed? ETHF — the native coin for gas and mining incentives.
Red flags (based on the information found): a mention of AI without verifiable artifacts (module/code/metrics).

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis

Component	Level	Score
AI reality	low	1
Onchain necessity	high	3
Token necessity	medium	2
Evidence	Tier‑1 present	2

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): The whitepaper contains the positioning “Integrating AI Computing Power” as a direction.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): This records intent, but without technical artifacts/metrics it does not prove a working AI component.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): What exactly the AI component does (task/model) is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The document lacks sufficient specifics for AI_1=1.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo/example of the AI part in operation was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/whitepaper
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website/whitepaper do not contain a reproducible AI demo.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: —
Context (version/date/how measured): —
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics are not identified per Tier‑1.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No tech description of the AI module (architecture/versions) was found per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The document describes the network/PoW/EVM, but the AI module is not specified.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: EthereumFair
Addresses/identifiers: Explorer: https://www.oklink.com/ethf
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/whitepaper
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The official website links to the explorer/network tools.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 1
What useful logic is onchain: EVM execution of smart contracts and the network state.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation directly describes smart contracts/EVM as the purpose of the network.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 1
“Replace the blockchain” test: without the blockchain, the smart contract network and PoW security/transaction accounting lose their meaning.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The purpose of the project is precisely a blockchain network; replacing it with a DB changes the trusted model.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The project has a native coin, ETHF.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation describes ETHF as the native coin of the network.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): ETHF is used for network operations (gas) and activity in the ecosystem.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation describes ETHF as “native coin … designed to power the blockchain”.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): Issuance and miner rewards are described as incentives for PoW security.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation describes mining rewards as the mechanism for expanding the supply.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The use of ETHF for governance is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/whitepaper
Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit governance mechanism tied to the token (not found).
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The token does not look replaceable without changing the trusted model of the PoW network.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The native currency and rewards are part of the security/economics of the network.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://etherfair.org/EthereumFair%20Whitepaper.pdf	Description of the project as a PoW fork of Ethereum with EVM; ETHF as the native coin; mention of “AI computing power” as positioning (intent).
Tier‑1	https://etherfair.org/whitepaper	Official links to the explorer, GitHub and documentation (context/navigation).
Tier‑1	https://github.com/ethereumfair/go-ethereum	Public client code (a fork of go‑ethereum) — verifiability of the implementation.