enqAI
enqAI (ENQAI) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
enqAI (formerly NoiseGPT) — an AI/Inference project on Ethereum, token (symbol: ENQAI).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a project that describes the ENQAI token as an element of an ecosystem around LLM nodes/inference (claimed).
- Who it’s for: node operators/network participants and inference clients (claimed).
- Why onchain/token: the ENQAI token is used for node incentives, discounts for inference clients, governance and staking (per the documentation).
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: holds/uses the ENQAI token and participates in the network’s scenarios (claimed).
- The system does: uses tokenomic incentives to support LLM nodes/inference (claimed).
- The user gets: discounts/incentives/participation in governance (claimed).
- Where the blockchain is: onchain — the token and transactions; AI inference/nodes — offchain infrastructure.
- Token role (if any): incentives/staking/governance and discounts (per the documentation).
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | enqAI |
| Also known as (aliases) | ENQAI | NoiseGPT |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/558_noisegpt_logo.svg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | ENQAI |
| Category | AI/Inference |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | 2023 |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x710287D1D39DCf62094A83EBB3e736e79400068a |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (payments + staking + governance) |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | The token is described as an instrument of incentives (LLM nodes), discounts for inference clients, governance and staking. |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | LLM nodes + inference |
| Use‑case (use_case) | AI inference network |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://enqai.com |
| Docs | https://enqai.com/wp |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | https://enqai.com/whitepaper |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x710287D1D39DCf62094A83EBB3e736e79400068a |
| X | https://twitter.com/enq_ai |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/noisegpt |
| Medium | https://medium.com/@noisegpt |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/noisegpt |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/noisegpt/ |
General project overview
In the Tier‑1 documentation, the ENQAI token is described as an element of an ecosystem around LLM nodes and inference: incentives for nodes, discounts for clients and governance/staking structures. At the same time, per Tier‑1 no demo/quality metrics of the AI part itself were found (hence the AI assessment is conservative).
Features/modules
- LLM nodes incentives: tokenomic incentives for nodes (claimed).
- Staking / security: staking as part of security (claimed).
- Governance: claimed in the documentation.
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: an operator maintains an LLM node → receives incentives (claimed).
- Scenario 2: an inference client uses the network → receives a discount when using the token (claimed).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an EVM wallet for working with the token; access to the project’s products/infrastructure.
- Network/chain: Ethereum.
- Fees: Ethereum fees for operations with the token.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the ENQAI token (ERC‑20), offchain infrastructure of nodes/inference (claimed), project documentation.
- Participant roles: LLM node operators; inference clients; token holders.
- Where logic runs: onchain — the token and transactions; offchain — LLM nodes / inference.
- Dependencies: Ethereum RPC; offchain node infrastructure.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility (Tier‑1): incentives for LLM nodes; discount for inference clients; governance; staking/security; uptime incentives.
- Who pays fees: users pay Ethereum fees for operations with the token.
- Issuance/burn: — (not established per Tier‑1).
- Security/incentive mechanisms: staking and incentives are described as part of security/sustainability (claimed).
Governance
- Who makes decisions: governance via the token (claimed); the details of the process are not established per Tier‑1.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: risks of the token smart contract and risks of the offchain node infrastructure.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: active (based on the presence of public documentation/the token contract).
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: — (not established).
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: —.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? LLM nodes and inference are mentioned as the purpose of the ecosystem (claimed).
- What is truly onchain? Onchain — the ENQAI token (ERC‑20).
- Why is a token needed? Incentives/staking/governance and discounts for inference (per the documentation).
- Red flags (based on the information found): without a Tier‑1 demo/metrics of the AI part (AI_2/AI_3), the actual operability and quality should be double‑checked.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 1 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | medium | 2 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI is described as the purpose of the ecosystem (LLM nodes / inference), not as a “plan without implementation”.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The intent flag adds no signal when AI is stated as the current goal/purpose.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): The tokenomics describe LLM nodes and inference clients as key roles of the ecosystem.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation directly lists the roles (LLM nodes, inference clients) and the purpose of the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo surface (inference interface/nodes) was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a specific demo, AI_2 remains 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No reproducible quality metrics were found in Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A tech description of the inference/node architecture is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires a more specific technical artifact (architecture/versions).
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: ENQAI contract: 0x710287D1D39DCf62094A83EBB3e736e79400068a
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x710287D1D39DCf62094A83EBB3e736e79400068a
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is observable in a public explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: per Tier‑1, the existence of protocol‑level onchain logic other than the token is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires contracts/logic not reducible to the token (not found).
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): It is not shown that the key function of AI inference breaks down without the blockchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token, ENQAI (ERC‑20).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x710287D1D39DCf62094A83EBB3e736e79400068a
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is observable in the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Mandatory payment for inference with the token is not established per Tier‑1 (there is the wording “discount for inference clients”).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): A discount ≠ a mandatory payment with the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): The token is used for incentives of LLM nodes and for security via staking.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation directly lists incentives and staking/security.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): Governance is stated as a role of the token in the documentation.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): “governance” is listed among the roles of the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit argument “possible without the token” (not found).
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://enqai.gitbook.io/enqai-documentation/project-overview/enqai-token | Roles of the ENQAI token: incentives for LLM nodes, discount for inference clients, governance, staking/security, uptime incentives; the token contract. |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x710287D1D39DCf62094A83EBB3e736e79400068a | Onchain fact: the ERC‑20 token ENQAI on Ethereum. |
| Tier‑2 | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/noisegpt | Token profile (for reference; context, not evidence). |
No comments to display
No comments to display