Skip to main content

Froge

Froge — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Froge — an AI/Other | Meme project on Ethereum, token (symbol: FROGE).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a memecoin project with the FROGE token (ERC‑20) on Ethereum; on the official website, AI is mentioned as a “narrative/direction” and plans for AI tools.
  • Who it’s for: members of the token community and users of the claimed products (FrogeSwap etc.), if/when they are available.
  • Why onchain/token: the onchain part is the token and related operations on Ethereum; the Tier‑1 necessity of the token for a specific working product is not established.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: interacts with the token (purchase/transfer/holding) and, where available, with ecosystem products (for example, FrogeSwap).
  2. The system does: performs standard ERC‑20 onchain operations and any product mechanics (if they are implemented onchain).
  3. The user gets: ownership of the token and access to ecosystem features (if/when they are available).
  4. Where the blockchain is: Ethereum (the FROGE token contract).
  5. Token role (if any): per Tier‑1 sources, the token is the central object of the ecosystem; the necessity of the token for a specific useful protocol mechanism is not established.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Froge
Also known as (aliases) FROGE
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) FROGE
Category AI/Other | Meme
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xcAb254f1a32343f11aB41fbdE90eCB410cDe348a
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 690,420,000,000,000
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) fixed supply (per the explorer)
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) positioning only (plans/roadmap)
Use‑case (use_case) memecoin + community products
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Froge is a memecoin with the FROGE token on Ethereum. Per Tier‑1 (official website/docs), the project associates itself with AI themes and describes plans for products (including FrogeSwap and AI tools), but Tier‑1 evidence of a working AI component of the product has not been identified.

Features/modules

  • The FROGE token (ERC‑20).
  • Claimed products/directions (FrogeSwap, analytics, AI tools) — require separate verification of “what is actually available” and where exactly the onchain logic is.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user interacts with the token → observes changes and updates of the ecosystem.
  • Scenario 2: a user uses FrogeSwap/other products (if available) → interacts with onchain components/contracts (separate verification is needed).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an Ethereum wallet for interacting with ERC‑20.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (the token contract is in the Passport).
  • Fees: Ethereum network fees and fees of the protocols used (if applicable).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: an ERC‑20 token on Ethereum + the project’s website/documentation; separate contracts/products (other than the token) are not recorded per Tier‑1.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — token operations; other logic of ecosystem products requires separate verification by addresses/contracts.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Supply (Tier‑1): max total supply is given in the token explorer.
  • Utility/necessity: a specific protocol necessity of the token is not established in Tier‑1; the descriptions on the website/in the docs require linking to specific contracts/products.

Governance

  • Not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.

Security and incidents

  • Audits / bug bounty / incidents: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Threat model: typical risks of an ERC‑20 token (control of admin keys, contract vulnerabilities, liquidity risks); for any “ecosystem products”, the risks depend on the specific contracts/architecture.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (there is an onchain token on Ethereum mainnet).
  • Roadmap: given on the website (the link is in links_*).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations/partners/cases: not established per Tier‑1.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Per Tier‑1, AI appears as a narrative/direction and plans (for example, AI analytics/an AI companion), but a working AI component of the product is not confirmed per Tier‑1.
  • What is truly onchain? the FROGE token on Ethereum.
  • Why is a token needed? per Tier‑1, the token is the central object of the ecosystem; a specific “necessity of the token” in the protocol sense is not established.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): claims about an “OpenAI mascot/involvement” appear in the project’s materials, but a Tier‑1 confirmation from OpenAI is not recorded; for the AI part there are no metrics/tech description.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): in Tier‑1 (official website), AI is mentioned as a direction/narrative and plans for AI tools.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://froge.vip/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is intent/plans; it does not prove a working AI component (AI_1..AI_4 remain 0).

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a working AI component of the product is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a specific description of AI functionality that can be verified — we set 0.

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a Tier‑1 demo of the AI tools in operation is not recorded.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a demo/guide on the AI features — we set 0.

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics were not found per Tier‑1.

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a tech description of the AI component/model versions is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a tech description/versions — we set 0.

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: the FROGE token: 0xcAb254f1a32343f11aB41fbdE90eCB410cDe348a
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xcAb254f1a32343f11aB41fbdE90eCB410cDe348a
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token and the network is confirmed by the explorer.

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: other than the token, useful onchain logic (product contracts) is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without addresses/a description of the product contracts — we set 0.

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the criticality of onchain for a useful property of the product is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification of “without the blockchain the product breaks down”.

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, FROGE.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xcAb254f1a32343f11aB41fbdE90eCB410cDe348a
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the name/symbol of the token and the contract are confirmed by the explorer.

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a mandatory payment for the service with the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of pay‑per‑use mechanics.

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentive/collateral mechanics of the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without staking/collateral/penalties in Tier‑1 — we set 0.

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a governance role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of governance.

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): per the available Tier‑1 materials, the token is not tied to a unique protocol function that cannot be implemented without the token.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://froge.vip/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 focuses on the narrative/community and plans; no explicit “necessity of the token” as a protocol mechanism was found.

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://froge.vip/ Tier‑1 positioning of the project, the AI narrative and plans (intent), the contract address.
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xcAb254f1a32343f11aB41fbdE90eCB410cDe348a Onchain fact of the FROGE token: name/symbol, max supply and contract on Ethereum.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the project has a working AI component” was found.
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/frogevip Reference profile and link navigation.
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/froge-vip/ Reference profile and link navigation.

No comments to display

Back to top