Skip to main content

Bankr Coin

Bankr Coin — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Bankr Coin — an AI/Agents \| Infra project on Base, token (symbol: BNKR).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a platform/ecosystem for “onchain agents”, with claimed “skills”, wallets and DeFi infrastructure for agents.
  • Who it’s for: builders and users who launch/use AI agents with onchain actions.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for the token and the agents’ actions; no Tier‑1 confirmation of an irreplaceable role of the BNKR token in the protocol logic was found.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the Leaderboard (and Terminal) web interface on bankr.bot.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: creates/connects an agent and installs “skills” (following the instructions on the website).
  2. The system does: provides the agent with a wallet and “crypto‑rails” (swap/LP/advanced orders, etc. — per the website description).
  3. The user gets: an agent that can execute onchain transactions and use the skills library.
  4. Where the blockchain is: onchain — wallets/transactions and the token on Base; offchain — AI computations.
  5. Token role (if any): BNKR exists as an ERC‑20 on Base; no Tier‑1 confirmation that BNKR is mandatory for access/payment/protocol incentives was found (at the same time, Tier‑1 describes a model of buybacks/treasury from fees).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Bankr Coin
Also known as (aliases) Bankr, BNKR
Logo (logo) ../assets/429_bankr-coin_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) BNKR
Category AI/Agents | Infra | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) Base
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) L2 (Optimistic Rollup, Base on Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x22aF33FE49fD1Fa80c7149773dDe5890D3c76F3b
Token model (token_type) utility (ecosystem alignment; buybacks + treasury from fees)
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) The manifesto describes: a portion of the 0.8% fees is directed to the purchase of BNKR and held in the treasury.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) on-chain agents + shared skills library
Use‑case (use_case) self-funding agents, on-chain transactions
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 2 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Bankr describes itself as a platform of “Agents that fund themselves” and “Onchain agents that actually work”, where agents have access to wallets and a set of “skills” for onchain actions (swap/LP/advanced orders, etc.). BNKR, meanwhile, exists as a token on the Base network; no Tier‑1 confirmation that BNKR is mandatory for access/payment/protocol incentives of the product was found (at the same time, Tier‑1 describes a model of buybacks/treasury from fees).

Features/modules

  • Shared skills library (a repository of skills).
  • “Crypto‑rails”: a wallet and a set of onchain operations for the agent.
  • Web interface (Leaderboard/Terminal/API).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a builder installs skills for an agent → the agent gets functions for onchain operations.
  • Scenario 2: a user views the Leaderboard/Terminal → tracks activity/campaigns (if any).
  • Scenario 3: a user checks the BNKR token contract in the Base explorer.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to bankr.bot and (if necessary) an EVM wallet.
  • Network/chain: Base (for the token and onchain operations).
  • Fees: Base network fees on onchain transactions.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: web interface, skills library (GitHub), the BNKR token (ERC‑20 on Base).
  • Participant roles: builders (create/install skills), users/agents.
  • Where logic runs: offchain — AI; onchain — transactions/wallets/token.
  • Dependencies: Base/EVM infrastructure; model/compute providers (mentioned as “API costs”).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility (Tier‑1): the manifesto describes that a portion of the 0.8% transaction fees is directed to the purchase of BNKR and held in the treasury; the website also describes the model “launch a token → trading fees pay for API costs”.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: no Tier‑1 confirmation was found that without BNKR the product/access/incentives “break down”.
  • Who pays fees: users of the Base network for onchain operations.
  • Where fees go: the manifesto describes the allocation of a portion of the 0.8% transaction fees to the purchase of BNKR and retention in the treasury.
  • Issuance/burn: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Treasury: a BNKR treasury is mentioned in the manifesto (details of treasury management are not established per Tier‑1).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • How protocol parameters change: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Keys/multisig: — (not established per Tier‑1).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Bug bounty: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Incidents: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Threat model: risks of agent errors (the website has a beta disclaimer); risks of smart contracts/wallets and integrations.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: beta (“beta” is indicated in the interface).
  • Key releases/milestones: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Roadmap: the “Bankr manifesto” PDF is published.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: integrations with DeFi operations (swap/LP/advanced orders) are claimed on the website; specific protocols/addresses are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Partners: — (not established per Tier‑1).
  • Where it’s actually used: within the bankr.bot web interface and the skills library.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The project claims “AI agents” and a skills ecosystem for running them; compute/models — offchain.
  • What is truly onchain? Wallets and onchain operations are claimed for the agents; the confirmed onchain artifact is the BNKR token on Base.
  • Why is a token needed? The existence of the BNKR token is confirmed; Tier‑1 describes buybacks/treasury from fees, but no Tier‑1 confirmation of an “irreplaceable protocol role” of the token was found.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (general wording without metrics/architecture); risks of autonomous agent actions; a beta disclaimer about possible errors.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI intent is present, but there are stronger Tier‑1 claims about the product/agents (AI_1, AI_2).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 records only intent; here there is a description of features/the interface.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): “Onchain agents” with wallets and skills for onchain transactions (swap/LP/advanced orders) are claimed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website explicitly describes the agents’ capabilities and the purpose of the platform.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): There is a public web interface (Leaderboard/Terminal) that can be reproducibly opened and used.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/leaderboard
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is an official “what you can touch” artifact.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 source has no quality metrics of AI models/agents.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description of the agent’s AI models/versions was not found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/ ; https://docs.bankr.bot
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are product claims, but without an AI architecture.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Base
  • Addresses/identifiers: BNKR token: 0x22aF33FE49fD1Fa80c7149773dDe5890D3c76F3b
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x22aF33FE49fD1Fa80c7149773dDe5890D3c76F3b
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is confirmed by the network explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: a Tier‑1 inventory of the product’s onchain contracts/modules (other than the token) is not recorded.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/ ; https://docs.bankr.bot
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website describes capabilities, but without a list of onchain contracts.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality per the SSOT test was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/ ; https://docs.bankr.bot
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The properties that “break down without the blockchain” are not formalized.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has the BNKR token (ERC‑20 on Base).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x22aF33FE49fD1Fa80c7149773dDe5890D3c76F3b
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of mandatory payment for the service with the BNKR token was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/ ; https://docs.bankr.bot
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website describes the model “launch a token → trading fees pay for API costs”, but BNKR is not specified as a mandatory means of payment.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of incentives/collateral/penalties tied to BNKR was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/ ; https://bankr.bot/bankr-manifesto.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of collateral/penalty/staking mechanics for BNKR.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of governance via BNKR was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/ ; https://bankr.bot/bankr-manifesto.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Governance processes are not described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 proof of an irreplaceable function of BNKR at the protocol level was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bankr.bot/ ; https://docs.bankr.bot ; https://bankr.bot/bankr-manifesto.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): A mandatory role of BNKR in the protocol mechanics is not confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://bankr.bot/ Tier‑1: “onchain agents”, a shared skills library, wallets and a set of onchain operations for agents are claimed.
Tier‑1 https://bankr.bot/leaderboard Tier‑1: a public interface (App/Demo) + a beta disclaimer.
Tier‑1 https://docs.bankr.bot Tier‑1: official documentation/API (navigation of the product and integrations).
Tier‑1 https://github.com/BankrBot/openclaw-skills Tier‑1: a public “shared skills library” for agents (a repository of skills).
Tier‑1 https://basescan.org/token/0x22aF33FE49fD1Fa80c7149773dDe5890D3c76F3b Tier‑1 onchain fact: the BNKR token contract on Base.
Tier‑1 https://bankr.bot/bankr-manifesto.pdf Tier‑1: it is described that a portion of the 0.8% transaction fees is directed to the purchase of BNKR and retained in the treasury.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “BNKR is mandatory for access/payment/protocol incentives (paywall, staking/slashing, governance)” was found.
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bankercoin-2 Tier‑2 profile/metadata (context).
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bankr-coin/ Tier‑2 profile/metadata (context).

No comments to display

Back to top