Skip to main content

AIvalanche DeFAI Agents

AIvalanche DeFAI Agents — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

AIvalanche DeFAI Agents — an AI/Agents project on Avalanche, token (symbol: AVAXAI).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a project/platform that claims a marketplace of tokenized AI and DeFAI agents in the Avalanche ecosystem.
  • Who it’s for: users and teams that need “agents for tasks” (analytics/automation in Web3).
  • Why onchain/token: the token is used as an onchain artifact of the ecosystem; the detailed necessity of the token for access/payment is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: chooses/creates an agent (per the project’s claim).
  2. The system does: uses LLM models to build “specialists” (per the project’s claim).
  3. The user gets: an agent that performs a task (for example, DeFi automation/analytics) — within the project’s claims.
  4. Where the blockchain is: onchain — the token and the possible tokenization of “agents”; offchain — LLM computations.
  5. Token role (if any): AVAXAI is mentioned as the “native token”, but the utility/tokenomics details were not found per Tier‑1 sources.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name AIvalanche DeFAI Agents
Also known as (aliases) AVAXAI
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) AVAXAI
Category AI/Agents | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) Avalanche
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Avalanche)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x8c8d2a7d8d9CF26F5ee1BbFc0bA56e93F4A4A7aC
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) LLM agents for Web3 tasks
Use‑case (use_case) tokenized AI/DeFAI agent marketplace
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

AIvalanche DeFAI Agents claims an “AI and DeFAI layer” for Avalanche and a marketplace where one can create/trade/interact with tokenized AI/DeFAI agents.

Features/modules

  • A marketplace of “agents” (per the claims on the website).
  • The use of LLM models for “agent specialists” (per the claims on the website).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user chooses an agent for a task → interacts with it within the platform (details not established).
  • Scenario 2: a user “tokenizes”/trades an agent (per the project’s claims) → receives an onchain artifact (details not established).
  • Scenario 3: the team promotes/rolls out new agents → publishes updates on social media.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet.
  • Network/chain: Avalanche.
  • Fees: Avalanche network fees for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the AVAXAI token + a web layer/platform (per the website).
  • Participant roles: users; the team/platform operators.
  • Where logic runs: LLM computations — offchain; the token/tokenization — onchain.
  • Dependencies: — (not established per Tier‑1 sources).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: the website says “All powered by the native $AVAXAI token”, but the utility details are not disclosed.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Who pays fees: users of the Avalanche network for onchain operations.
  • Where fees go: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Issuance/burn: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Treasury: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • How protocol parameters change: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Keys/multisig: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Bug bounty: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Incidents: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Threat model: per the available materials, the AI part is not accompanied by tech details and metrics; there also remain the risks of a token ecosystem without transparent tokenomics.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: mainnet (the token exists onchain; the product artifacts are marked “Coming Soon” on the website).
  • Key releases/milestones: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Roadmap: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Partners: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Where it’s actually used: deployment “across Avalanche, Web3 dApps, X, Telegram and more” is claimed (without confirmed artifacts per Tier‑1 sources).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The website claims the use of “specialized LLM models” for AI/DeFAI agents.
  • What is truly onchain? The confirmed onchain artifact is the AVAXAI token contract; separate onchain modules of the platform are not confirmed by addresses.
  • Why is a token needed? On the website the token is called the “native token”, but a Tier‑1 description of the utility/tokenomics was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): no tech details/metrics; no verifiable product artifacts other than the token; “Coming Soon” instead of a demo/guide.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): There is AI intent, but the website also describes an AI feature (AI_1).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 is used when there is only intent; here there is a description of “what the AI does”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): It is claimed that the platform uses specialized LLM models for “AI and DeFAI Agent Specialists”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 source explicitly states the use of LLM models and their purpose.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A public demo/guide (App/Demo) confirming the operation of the agents was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website shows “Coming Soon”, without a reproducible “what you can touch”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No quantitative metrics/benchmarks were found in the Tier‑1 source.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description/architecture/model versions at the level of independent verification were not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are general claims, but without sufficient tech details.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Avalanche
  • Addresses/identifiers: the AVAXAI token: 0x8c8d2a7d8d9CF26F5ee1BbFc0bA56e93F4A4A7aC
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://snowscan.xyz/token/0x8c8d2a7d8d9CF26F5ee1BbFc0bA56e93F4A4A7aC
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a public onchain artifact (the token contract) in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: No Tier‑1 contract addresses/description of onchain modules of the platform (other than the token) were found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website claims a marketplace, but without contract addresses/specifications.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: A Tier‑1 justification of “without the blockchain the product breaks down” was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Trustless mechanics, critical properties and attacks upon “replacing the blockchain” are not described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, AVAXAI.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://snowscan.xyz/token/0x8c8d2a7d8d9CF26F5ee1BbFc0bA56e93F4A4A7aC
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is given in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A Tier‑1 description of payment for the service with the AVAXAI token was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is “powered by token”, but no specifics on payment/tariff.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A Tier‑1 description of incentives/collateral/penalties was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Specific incentive mechanics are not disclosed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A Tier‑1 description of governance via the AVAXAI token was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The available Tier‑1 content has no governance mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 proof of an irreplaceable function of AVAXAI at the protocol level was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.avaxai.org/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no described onchain mechanics that require specifically this token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.avaxai.org/ Tier‑1: a marketplace of tokenized AI/DeFAI agents and the use of LLM models are claimed.
Tier‑1 https://snowscan.xyz/token/0x8c8d2a7d8d9CF26F5ee1BbFc0bA56e93F4A4A7aC Tier‑1 onchain fact: the AVAXAI token contract on Avalanche.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is a public App/Demo for verifying the operation of the agents” was found per Tier‑1 sources.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “why the token is needed at the protocol level (payment/incentives/governance)” was found per Tier‑1 sources.
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/aivalanche-defai-agents Tier‑2 token profile/metadata and links (context).
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aivalanche-defai-agents/ Tier‑2 token profile/metadata and links (context).