Skip to main content

Plankton in Pain

Plankton in Pain (AAAHHM) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Plankton in Pain — a Meme / Social project in the Solana ecosystem. The official website (aaahhm.meme) describes the token as a meme project around the “Plankton” image and a “viral takeover”; the verifiable onchain part is the SPL token (address in Solscan/CMC). Despite the AI tags on aggregators, the Tier‑1 sources contain no confirmed AI product.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a meme token/community project on Solana.
  • Who it’s for: community members and meme‑market traders.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for owning/transferring/trading the AAAHHM token; no other onchain mechanics are claimed in Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: interacts with AAAHHM and the community on social media.
  2. The system does: maintains media channels (X/Telegram/TikTok) and a presence on DEX tracking (per the website).
  3. The user gets: participation in the meme culture/community and liquidity/trading of the token.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the AAAHHM token exists onchain on the Solana network; the address is available in the explorer.
  5. Token role (if any): the ecosystem’s meme token; utility functions are not confirmed.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Plankton in Pain
Also known as (aliases) AAAHHM; AAAHHM_SOL
Logo (logo) ../assets/413_plankton-in-pain_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) AAAHHM
Category Meme
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) 2024 (per CMC: ATH Dec 2024)
Project status (status) active (the website is available; the token is traded)
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract 7Rtegu95FZZ2KX3zA37LU1ypicxu6pBysNEagFwhpump
Token model (token_type) community / meme
Max supply 999.99M AAAHHM (CoinMarketCap)
Issuance fixed (per CMC max supply = total supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) meme token; utility is not confirmed by Tier‑1
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) unknown
Use‑case (use_case) meme/social token
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary 0 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Plankton in Pain is a meme project that uses a “viral takeover” narrative on its website and is present on social media (X/Telegram/TikTok). No product/technical materials about AI, a protocol, or onchain utility beyond the token itself were found in the available Tier‑1 sources; therefore the card focuses on the verifiable fact of the token’s existence and on public descriptions.

Features/modules

  • A landing website describing the meme narrative with links to social media/DEX tracking.
  • The AAAHHM token on Solana (address in CMC/Solscan).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user interacts with AAAHHM → follows the community news and, when needed, performs operations with the token.
  • Scenario 2: a user spreads meme content/participates on TikTok/X → sustains attention to the token.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a Solana wallet and SOL for fees.
  • Network/chain: Solana mainnet.
  • Fees: Solana network fees + DEX/CEX fees when swapping.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: SPL token; landing website; social media.
  • Participant roles: token holders; community members.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — the token; everything else — offchain (content/social media).
  • Dependencies: Solana RPC/wallets; DEX infrastructure.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: — (not established per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: — (not established).
  • Who pays fees: — (not established).
  • Where fees go: — (not established).
  • Issuance/burn: — (not established).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: — (not established).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: — (not established).
  • Treasury: — (not established).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not established per Tier‑1 sources).
  • How protocol parameters change: — (not established).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: — (not established).
  • Keys/multisig: — (not established).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (not established per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Bug bounty: — (not established).
  • Incidents: — (not established).
  • Threat model: — (not established).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: — (not established per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Key releases/milestones: — (not established).
  • Roadmap: — (not established).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: — (not established per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Partners: — (not established).
  • Where it’s actually used: — (not established).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Not confirmed: the Tier‑1 sources contain no description of an AI product/models.
  • What is truly onchain? the AAAHHM token (Solana) and its supply/address parameters (CMC).
  • Why is a token needed? participation in the meme economy/trading; no other utility is claimed in Tier‑1.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing — an AI tag on an aggregator without evidence; what to double‑check — the appearance of docs/a repository/a product.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present (partially) 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 statements about developing AI features were found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aaahhm.meme/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website describes the meme narrative, not an AI roadmap.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI features are not described.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (No Tier‑1 source for claim “the project’s AI features” was found.)
  • Context (Tier‑2, not evidence): https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/plankton-in-pain/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): CMC has no description of an AI product, only a brief meme blurb.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI demos/examples are absent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no links to a product/demo.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): metrics are absent.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): technical documentation on AI is absent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no docs/repository/whitepaper.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: 7Rtegu95FZZ2KX3zA37LU1ypicxu6pBysNEagFwhpump
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/7Rtegu95FZZ2KX3zA37LU1ypicxu6pBysNEagFwhpump
  • Context (Tier‑2, not evidence): https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/plankton-in-pain/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token address and the network are verified via an onchain explorer (Solscan); CMC is used only as context.
  • Conflict note (if any): the text snapshot of solscan does not display details (scripts), but the link/address are retained.

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not confirmed (other than the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aaahhm.meme/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website does not describe any protocol onchain mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: without onchain, ownership/trading of the token breaks down, but no product beyond the token is confirmed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (No Tier‑1 source for claim “onchain is critical for the product (other than the token)” was found.)
  • Context (Tier‑2, not evidence): https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/plankton-in-pain/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the criticality of onchain for the “product” is not proven.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the AAAHHM token exists.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/7Rtegu95FZZ2KX3zA37LU1ypicxu6pBysNEagFwhpump
  • Context (Tier‑2, not evidence): https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/plankton-in-pain/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed by an onchain explorer (Solscan); CMC is used only as context.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the token’s payment utility is not confirmed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aaahhm.meme/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website has no description of a payment/service.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentives/collateral/penalties are not described in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (No Tier‑1 source for claim “token incentives/staking/slashing” was found.)
  • Context (Tier‑2, not evidence): https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/plankton-in-pain/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): CMC contains no description of token mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance via the token is not confirmed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aaahhm.meme/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no DAO/votes/rules.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): replaceability is not assessed (no description of utility).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://aaahhm.meme/ the project’s official landing page and social links
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/plankton-in-pain/ the AAAHHM ticker, supply, contract/network, brief description
Tier‑1 https://solscan.io/token/7Rtegu95FZZ2KX3zA37LU1ypicxu6pBysNEagFwhpump the onchain identifier of the SPL token (address)
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 documentation/whitepaper/repository on “AI” was found per Tier‑1 sources.

No comments to display

Back to top