Crypto Agent Trading (C.A.T)

Crypto Agent Trading (C.A.T) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Crypto Agent Trading (C.A.T) — an AI/Agents project on Solana; there is a web application and an SPL token (symbol: C.A.T).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: a web service/terminal that shows signals/a scanner for tokens (claimed).
Who it’s for: users who look at lists/signals/scoring for tokens.
Why onchain/token: onchain — for the existence of the token and (possibly) interaction with Solana; the necessity of the token in the product is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): https://app.boltrade.ai/

How it works (very briefly)

The user does: opens the web application and looks at sections/signals.
The system does: shows token lists and claimed metrics/scoring (including AI labels) in the interface.
The user gets: a showcase of signals/scoring and navigation across tokens.
Where the blockchain is: the token and related data belong to Solana.
Token role: the role in the operation of the service is not established.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	Crypto Agent Trading (C.A.T)
Also known as (aliases)	Boltrade \| C.A.T
Logo (logo)	—
Token symbol (ticker)	C.A.T
Category	AI/Agents \| Trading
Primary chain (chain)	Solana
Type	non-EVM
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date)	—
Project status (status)	—
Token (standard)	SPL
Token contract	DqrcZRHM9JuCUhnLyaWF7rLLjxE5h3MbiG7iferUpump
Token model (token_type)	—
Max supply	—
Issuance	—
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief)	—
Governance	—
Admins/keys	—
Audit	—
Bug bounty	—
Team (team)	—
Funding (investors/funding)	—
AI component (ai_component)	AI scoring/signals in terminal
Use‑case (use_case)	terminal/signals for tokens
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary	1 / 1 / 0 / 1
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	https://boltrade.ai/
App / Demo	https://app.boltrade.ai/
Docs	https://docs.boltrade.ai
GitHub	—
Releases / Changelog	https://twitter.com/boltrade_ai
Whitepaper	https://cat.boltrade.ai/statement.pdf
Roadmap	—
Security advisories	—
Explorer	https://explorer.solana.com/address/DqrcZRHM9JuCUhnLyaWF7rLLjxE5h3MbiG7iferUpump
X	https://twitter.com/boltrade_ai
Discord	—
Telegram	—
Medium	—
Audit report(s)	—
Bug bounty	—
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	—
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/crypto-agent-trading/

General project overview

Per the available sources, the project is presented as a web application that displays data/lists/scoring for tokens and uses AI labels in the interface (the detailed scoring methodology and the tech description of the models are not confirmed by Tier‑1). The onchain part is confirmed at the level of the existence of an SPL token on Solana.

Features/modules

Web interface of the terminal.
Sections with lists/signals/scoring (per the interface).

Typical scenarios

Scenario 1: a user opens the terminal → looks at signals/scoring → navigates to tokens for details.

Getting started (wallet/network)

What you need: a browser; a Solana wallet may be required for onchain actions (not confirmed by Tier‑1).
Network/chain: Solana.
Fees: Solana network fees for transactions (if the user performs them).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

Components: web client, backend/scoring data (details not established).
Where logic runs: visualization/scoring — offchain; the token — onchain.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

The utility of the token in the protocol/service is not established.

Governance

Not established.

Security and incidents

Public audits/bug bounty/incidents: not established.

Project status and timeline

There is a public web application; other milestones/releases are not established.

Ecosystem/integrations

Not established.

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? AI elements (AI labels/scoring) are claimed in the terminal, but the methodology and quality metrics are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
What is truly onchain? the SPL token on the Solana network.
Why is a token needed? the necessity of the token for the operation of the terminal is not established.
Red flags (based on the information found): absence of a Tier‑1 tech description of the AI and of validatable quality metrics; possible AI‑washing.

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis

Component	Level	Score
AI reality	low	1
Onchain necessity	low	1
Token necessity	low	0
Evidence	Tier‑1 present	1

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 roadmap/plan for AI was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 roadmap found.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): the purpose of the AI component is described insufficiently for verification, apart from labels in the UI.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://app.boltrade.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 explanation of “how exactly the AI works” was found.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): a web application with terminal/scoring sections is available (a demo of the functionality).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://app.boltrade.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a public interface that can be opened to check the presence of the claimed functionality.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: —
Context (version/date/how measured): —
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): quality metrics of the AI scoring were not found in Tier‑1.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): the tech description/architecture of the AI component was not found in Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 tech documentation.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: Solana
Addresses/identifiers: token mint = DqrcZRHM9JuCUhnLyaWF7rLLjxE5h3MbiG7iferUpump
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/DqrcZRHM9JuCUhnLyaWF7rLLjxE5h3MbiG7iferUpump
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain explorer records the existence of the mint on Solana.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 0
What useful logic is onchain: not established.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 description of protocol onchain logic was found.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 0
“Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification that the product breaks down without onchain.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): the project has an SPL token on Solana.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/DqrcZRHM9JuCUhnLyaWF7rLLjxE5h3MbiG7iferUpump
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the mint is confirmed onchain.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): payment for the service with the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 description of the token utility was found.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): not established.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): governance via the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): not established.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — not found
Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data on the role of the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://app.boltrade.ai/	Public demo/interface of the terminal (AI_2).
Tier‑1	https://explorer.solana.com/address/DqrcZRHM9JuCUhnLyaWF7rLLjxE5h3MbiG7iferUpump	Onchain fact of the SPL token (mint) on Solana.
Tier‑1	https://docs.boltrade.ai	No Tier‑1 source for claim “how exactly the AI scoring/agent works” was found in the available materials (content unavailable/timeout).
Tier‑1	https://docs.boltrade.ai	No Tier‑1 source for claim “the token is necessary for the operation of the service” was found in the available materials (content unavailable/timeout).