Neurashi
Neurashi — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Neurashi — an AI/Agents project on Solana that positions itself as an AI platform with an application for analysis/chat and products around trading (claimed); the project has a token (symbol: NEI).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a website and a set of applications (ChartMind, etc.) where AI features for analysis/chat and trading insights are claimed.
- Who it’s for: users who need an interface for questions/analysis (in the context of the crypto market) and related tools.
- Why onchain/token: onchain is confirmed at the level of an SPL token on Solana; the tokenomics claims incentives/staking rewards (claimed).
- What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): https://chartmind.neurashi.com
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: opens the web application and enters a query/selects a tool.
- The system does: returns answers/analysis claimed as AI functionality.
- The user gets: the result in the interface (text/analytics/insights).
- Where the blockchain is: the NEI token and the claimed incentive mechanics belong to Solana.
- Token role: the tokenomics claims staking and community rewards; the specific onchain mechanisms of implementation are not established.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Neurashi |
| Also known as (aliases) | NEI |
| Logo (logo) | — |
| Token symbol (ticker) | NEI |
| Category | AI/Agents | Trading |
| Primary chain (chain) | Solana |
| Type | non-EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Solana) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | 2024 |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | SPL |
| Token contract | FrQNn7xSTQWdv3SC8stZfT76QeWgvFWVQtCJhdGVjHJK |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (governance) |
| Max supply | 1,000,000,000 NEI |
| Issuance | fixed (total supply) |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | distributions and “staking & community rewards” are claimed (see Evidence) |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | yes |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI chat / chart analysis |
| Use‑case (use_case) | analysis/chat, trading tools |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 2 / 1 / 1 / 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://neurashi.com/ |
| App / Demo | https://chartmind.neurashi.com |
| Docs | https://neurashi.gitbook.io/neurashi-documents |
| GitHub | https://github.com/Neurashi |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | https://neurashi.com/road-map/ |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://solscan.io/token/FrQNn7xSTQWdv3SC8stZfT76QeWgvFWVQtCJhdGVjHJK |
| X | https://twitter.com/Neurashi |
| Discord | https://discord.gg/neurashi |
| Telegram | https://t.me/NeurashiGP |
| Medium | https://medium.com/@Neurashi |
| Audit report(s) | https://skynet.certik.com/projects/neurashi |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/neurashi |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/neurashi/ |
General project overview
Per the official website and documentation, the project is positioned as an AI platform with an application (ChartMind) and related tools. The documents also provide information about the NEI token and a tokenomics section that describes distributions and rewards (staking/community rewards). The tech description of the AI models/architecture and quality metrics are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Features/modules
- ChartMind (web application).
- Chat/analysis functionality claimed on the website.
- Sections/descriptions of products in the documentation (general level).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user opens ChartMind → asks a query about a ticker/the market → gets an answer/analysis.
- Scenario 2: a user studies the tokenomics → checks the token address and basic parameters in the explorer.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a browser for the web application; a Solana wallet for operations with the token.
- Network/chain: Solana (mainnet).
- Fees: Solana network fees for transactions.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: web client of the applications; an SPL token on Solana; backend/infrastructure details are not established.
- Where logic runs: AI processing, judging by the format, happens offchain; the token — onchain.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Total supply: 1,000,000,000 NEI (per the website/tokenomics).
- Distribution: the tokenomics specifies distribution categories and wallets (see Evidence).
- Rewards/staking: “staking & community rewards” are claimed (as incentives for participants).
Governance
- Not established.
Security and incidents
- An audit profile on Certik is listed (see links_*).
Project status and timeline
- There is a public website and applications; the whitepaper on the website is marked as “coming soon”.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Not established.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? AI chat and analysis (including chart/market analysis) via the web application are claimed; tech details and quality metrics are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- What is truly onchain? the NEI token as an SPL mint on Solana; the tokenomics describes incentives/distributions.
- Why is a token needed? incentives and rewards (staking/community rewards) are claimed; verification of the implementation of the mechanics requires additional Tier‑1 confirmations.
- Red flags (based on the information found): marketing claims about an “AI platform” without verifiable metrics/architecture; potential AI‑washing.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | medium | 2 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 1 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): a formalized AI roadmap as a separate Tier‑1 document was not found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website has general sections, but no verifiable AI roadmap was found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): AI chat and analysis (including chart/market analysis) are claimed as part of the platform.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurashi.com/ ; https://neurashi.gitbook.io/neurashi-documents
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 description of the features on the website/in the documentation, but without tech details.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the ChartMind web application is available (demo).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://chartmind.neurashi.com
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the public interface is available on the project’s domain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): quality metrics/benchmarks were not found in Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the detailed architecture/versions of the AI models were not found in Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no tech documentation at the level of architecture/training/versions.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Solana
- Addresses/identifiers: token mint = FrQNn7xSTQWdv3SC8stZfT76QeWgvFWVQtCJhdGVjHJK
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/FrQNn7xSTQWdv3SC8stZfT76QeWgvFWVQtCJhdGVjHJK
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain explorer records the existence of the mint on Solana.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no contract/protocol addresses were found other than the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the AI application can work offchain; onchain criticality is not proven.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has an SPL token on Solana.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/FrQNn7xSTQWdv3SC8stZfT76QeWgvFWVQtCJhdGVjHJK
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the mint is confirmed onchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): payment for the service with the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no description of paying for features with the token was found in the available documents.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the tokenomics claims staking and community rewards (incentives for participants).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurashi.gitbook.io/neurashi-documents/neurashi-token-usdnei/tokenomics ; https://neurashi.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics describes the incentive and distribution mechanism.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): governance via the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no description of governance was found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data on how critical the token is for the features.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://neurashi.com/ | Official website: description of the products, the token, links to the applications. |
| Tier‑1 | https://chartmind.neurashi.com | Public demo (AI_2). |
| Tier‑1 | https://solscan.io/token/FrQNn7xSTQWdv3SC8stZfT76QeWgvFWVQtCJhdGVjHJK | Onchain fact of the SPL token (mint) on Solana. |
| Tier‑1 | https://neurashi.gitbook.io/neurashi-documents/neurashi-token-usdnei/tokenomics | Tier‑1 description of the tokenomics, including staking/community rewards and total supply. |
| Tier‑1 | https://skynet.certik.com/projects/neurashi | Audit profile (Certik). |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “architecture/versions of the AI models and quality metrics” was found. |
No comments to display
No comments to display