DeFAI
DeFAI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
DeFAI — an AI/Agents | DeFi project on Base, token (symbol: DEFAI).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an AI terminal and “agent” for DeFi tasks (portfolio/signals/execution of trading actions — per the project’s claim).
- Who it’s for: users who want a “terminal” interface and automation of DeFi actions.
- Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for DeFi actions (swaps/transactions) and for accounting of the token; the token is used for staking and for governance of Titan Vault (per the project’s claim).
- What you can actually touch (Tier‑1):
https://terminal.defaidao.com/(DeFAI Terminal).
How it works (very briefly)
- User connects a wallet and opens the terminal.
- System analyzes data (onchain and external sources — per the project’s claim) and forms recommendations/automation.
- User gets an interface for portfolio actions and (in the claimed modes) autonomous execution.
- Where the blockchain is: actions (transactions/swaps) happen onchain; the DEFAI token is an ERC‑20 on the Base network.
- Token role: staking and participation in the governance of Titan Vault (per the project’s claim).
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | DeFAI |
| Also known as (aliases) | DEFAI |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/407_defai_logo.svg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | DEFAI |
| Category | AI/Agents | DeFi |
| Primary chain (chain) | Base |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | L2 (Optimistic Rollup, Base on Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0xf857b2764095b9a5f57c3e71f82f297fe4e45334 |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | 1,000,000,000 DEFAI |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | staking; part of the agent’s revenue goes to Titan Vault (per the project’s claim) |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI agent + DeFi terminal |
| Use‑case (use_case) | portfolio/signals/autotrading |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 2 / 1 / 2 / 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://www.defaidao.com/ |
| App / Demo | https://terminal.defaidao.com/ |
| Docs | https://www.defaidao.com/whitepaper |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | https://www.defaidao.com/whitepaper |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://basescan.org/token/0xf857b2764095b9a5f57c3e71f82f297fe4e45334 |
| X | https://twitter.com/defai_dao |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/deFAI_DAO_bot |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/defai |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/defai/ |
General project overview
DeFAI is positioned as an AI‑powered “terminal” and agent that monitors data (onchain and external sources) and helps the user navigate DeFi. The website also describes plans for autonomous execution of trading actions and a separate “Titan Vault”.
Features/modules
- DeFAI Terminal (web interface; see links_*).
- DeFAI Agent (data monitoring, insights and claimed autonomous execution).
- Titan Vault (a fund/treasury governed by stakers — per the project’s claim).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user connects a wallet → gets a “briefing”/terminal interface → performs DeFi actions.
- Scenario 2: a token holder/staker participates in Titan Vault (per the project’s claim) and gets/uses features tied to staking.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an EVM wallet.
- Network/chain: Base (per the token/explorer).
- Fees: network fees for onchain actions.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: web terminal + offchain agent; the onchain part is interaction with DeFi protocols/the token.
- Where logic runs: UI/agent — offchain; transactions — onchain.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: staking and participation in Titan Vault (per the project’s claim on the website).
- Incentive mechanisms: flows of the agent’s revenue into Titan Vault and staking tiers are claimed (per the project’s claim).
- Details of issuance/vesting: not established.
Governance
- The governance of Titan Vault is described as “DAO‑managed” and governed by token stakers (per the project’s claim).
Security and incidents
- Public audits/bug bounty/incidents: not established.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the terminal is available (see App/Demo).
- Roadmap: not found.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations/partners: not established.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? an AI agent is claimed that monitors data and helps make decisions/automate actions in DeFi.
- What is truly onchain? the DEFAI token and any DeFi actions are executed onchain.
- Why is a token needed? staking and governance of Titan Vault are claimed.
- Red flags (based on the information found): much of the functionality is described as “will be/planned”; it needs to be double‑checked what exactly already works in the terminal and which onchain mechanisms are actually used.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | medium | 2 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | medium | 2 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI is described as a working product component (terminal/agent), not only as an “intention”.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.defaidao.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the intent flag is not needed, since there is an accessible interface (see AI_2).
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the agent monitors data (onchain and external sources) and produces “insights” for DeFi actions; the terminal is the interface for this.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.defaidao.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website explicitly describes the Agent/Terminal and their purpose.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the DeFAI Terminal web interface is available (wallet connection).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://terminal.defaidao.com/ ; https://www.defaidao.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a public terminal that can be opened.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no quantitative quality metrics were found in the reviewed Tier‑1 sources.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): there is no sufficient Tier‑1 tech description of the model/architecture.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Base
- Addresses/identifiers: DEFAI token contract = 0xf857b2764095b9a5f57c3e71f82f297fe4e45334
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0xf857b2764095b9a5f57c3e71f82f297fe4e45334
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): BaseScan confirms the network and the token contract address.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: it is not established that the project has separate useful onchain logic beyond the token.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the product is described as a terminal/agent on top of DeFi, without an explicit description of its own contracts.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality specifically for the DeFAI product.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a token, DeFAI (DEFAI), on the Base network.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0xf857b2764095b9a5f57c3e71f82f297fe4e45334
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): BaseScan confirms the token/ticker/address.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation of mandatory payment for the service with the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): not established.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): staking and participation in the Titan Vault economy are tied to the token (per the project’s claim).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.defaidao.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website describes “$DEFAI stakers” and the distribution of the agent’s revenue into the Vault.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): $DEFAI stakers govern Titan Vault (per the project’s claim).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.defaidao.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website explicitly says that stakers “govern its management”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://www.defaidao.com/ | Claimed Agent/Terminal components, description of Titan Vault and the role of token stakers. |
| Tier‑1 | https://terminal.defaidao.com/ | Availability of the demo/terminal interface (wallet connection). |
| Tier‑1 | https://basescan.org/token/0xf857b2764095b9a5f57c3e71f82f297fe4e45334 | Onchain fact of the DeFAI (DEFAI) token: address on the Base network and max supply. |
No comments to display
No comments to display