Skip to main content

Flavia Is Online

Flavia Is Online — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Flavia Is Online — a Meme project on Solana, token (symbol: FLAVIA).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a token on the Solana network (a publicly available mint).
  • Who it’s for: users who interact with the token and its social channels.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is used for the existence and transfer of the token; no confirmations of an AI component per Tier‑1 were found.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. User transfers the token on the Solana network.
  2. Chain records the operations in the blockchain.
  3. User receives the token at an address and can make further transfers.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the issuance of and operations with the token happen onchain.
  5. Token role: the role in a separate product/protocol is not established.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Flavia Is Online
Also known as (aliases) FLAVIA
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) FLAVIA
Category Meme
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) —
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract 3HYx6a9whu5a4dnzE62WNXg46MrEmu9LFxutR2YBpump
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) token
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary 0 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the available Tier‑1 data, the project is presented as a token on the Solana network. An additional product part (app/protocol) and an AI component are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

Features/modules

  • SPL token on the Solana network.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user transfers the token → the transaction is confirmed by the network → the token is displayed at the address.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a Solana wallet.
  • Network/chain: Solana (mainnet).
  • Fees: Solana network fees for transactions.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the SPL token mint and holder addresses.
  • Where logic runs: token operations are recorded onchain.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Utility/necessity of the token in the protocol: not established.

Governance

  • Not established.

Security and incidents

  • Public audits/bug bounty/incidents: not established.

Project status and timeline

  • Not established.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Not established.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? no Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found.
  • What is truly onchain? the SPL token on the Solana network.
  • Why is a token needed? not established.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): any AI claims about the project require Tier‑1 confirmations.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 claim/roadmap about AI was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no Tier‑1 mentions of AI intent in the available sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI functionality is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of an AI component.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no demo/example of an AI component in operation was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 AI demo.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics were not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no tech description of an AI component was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 tech description.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: token mint = 3HYx6a9whu5a4dnzE62WNXg46MrEmu9LFxutR2YBpump
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/3HYx6a9whu5a4dnzE62WNXg46MrEmu9LFxutR2YBpump
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain explorer confirms the existence of the token (mint).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): only the token was found, without confirmed protocol logic.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality for a separate product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has an SPL token on Solana.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/3HYx6a9whu5a4dnzE62WNXg46MrEmu9LFxutR2YBpump
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the mint is confirmed onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation of payment for the service with the token was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): not established.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of the token utility.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance via the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of governance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://solscan.io/token/3HYx6a9whu5a4dnzE62WNXg46MrEmu9LFxutR2YBpump Onchain fact of the SPL token (mint) on Solana.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the project has an AI component” was found.