ChainAware.ai
ChainAware.ai — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
ChainAware.ai — an AI/Other | Infra project on BNB Smart Chain, token (symbol: AWARE).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a web service with AI agents for analyzing onchain behavior (wallet audit, fraud/rug pull detection, transaction monitoring).
- Who it’s for: private users and Web3 teams (fraud detection/AML, user analytics, growth agents).
- Why onchain/token: the product is mostly offchain, and the blockchain here serves as a data source; the token is used as an asset of the project’s ecosystem (the utility/necessity of the token is not established).
- What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the tools at
https://chainaware.ai/(for example Wallet Auditor / Fraud Detector / Rug Pull Detector).
How it works (very briefly)
- User enters a wallet/contract address or selects a tool (audit/fraud/rug pull).
- System analyzes onchain data and builds predictive/risk scores (per the project’s claim).
- User receives a score/signals and a brief interpretation.
- Where the blockchain is: as a data source (Ethereum/BSC/Polygon/TON and others; see the website/docs).
- Token role: not established.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | ChainAware.ai |
| Also known as (aliases) | ChainAware |
| Logo (logo) | — |
| Token symbol (ticker) | AWARE |
| Category | AI/Other | Infra |
| Primary chain (chain) | BNB Smart Chain |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | BEP-20 |
| Token contract | 0xcf221109f45854ac52159420c543757fe84c113a |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | 100,000,000 AWARE |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | fraud/rugpull prediction + wallet analytics |
| Use‑case (use_case) | risk scoring for addresses/pools |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 2 / 1 / 0 / 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://chainaware.ai/ |
| App / Demo | https://chainaware.ai/ |
| Docs | https://learn.chainaware.ai/how-to-use-chainaware.ai |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | https://chainaware.ai/blog/ |
| Whitepaper | https://chainaware.ai/whitepaper |
| Roadmap | https://chainaware.ai/blog/chainaware-ai-ai-agents-and-roadmap-for-invidual-users/ |
| Security advisories | https://learn.chainaware.ai/ai-fraud-detection-for-users |
| Explorer | https://bscscan.com/token/0xcf221109f45854ac52159420c543757fe84c113a |
| X | https://twitter.com/ChainAware |
| Discord | https://discord.gg/RJx9Junef8 |
| Telegram | https://t.me/ChainAware_ai |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | https://learn.chainaware.ai/ai-fraud-detection-for-users/how-to-share-your-wallet-audit |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/chainaware-ai |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chainaware-ai/ |
General project overview
ChainAware.ai is positioned as a set of AI agents and a “prediction engine” for onchain behavior: the service promises to assess fraud risk and the probability of a rug pull, as well as to perform behavioral analytics and scoring.
Features/modules
- Wallet Auditor / Fraud Detector / Rug Pull Detector (tools for users).
- Transaction Monitoring Agent (for business).
- “MCP for AI‑Agents” and an API section in the docs (per the GitBook navigation).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user checks a wallet address → receives a risk score/indicators (per the project’s claim).
- Scenario 2: a team connects transaction monitoring → uses the signals for fraud detection.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a wallet/contract address on a supported network; some features may require an account/subscription (see the website).
- Network/chain: Ethereum / Polygon / BNB Smart Chain / TON are supported (per the project’s claim on the website/in the docs).
- Fees: service terms/pricing — see the website (not detailed).
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: web application + offchain analytics; onchain is used as a data source.
- Where logic runs: predominantly offchain (per the project’s claim).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Utility/necessity of the token: not established.
Governance
- Not established.
Security and incidents
- Public audits/bug bounty/incidents: not established.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the service is available (see Website / Docs).
- Roadmap: see links_*.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Ecosystem and partners: listed on the website (see Website).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? AI models/agents for predicting behavior and detecting fraud/rug pulls (per the project’s claim).
- What is truly onchain? the checks are performed on onchain data (data source), but the computation/scoring is predominantly offchain (per the project’s claim).
- Why is a token needed? not established.
- Red flags (based on the information found): claims of “98% accuracy” without methodology/context; separate verification of the metrics and reproducibility is required.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | medium | 2 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI is described as an operating service (see AI_1/AI_2), not only as an intent in the roadmap.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://chainaware.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): we do not use the intent flag, since there are described features and tools.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the service predicts behavior/risk (fraud/rugpull) based on onchain data and outputs risk scores.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://chainaware.ai/ ; https://learn.chainaware.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 sources directly describe the fraud detection / rug pull prediction / wallet auditing features.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): tools (Wallet Auditor / Fraud Detector / Rug Pull Detector) and “Use for free” links are available on the website.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://chainaware.ai/ ; https://learn.chainaware.ai/how-to-use-chainaware.ai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a public web interface that can be opened and used.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: “accuracy” values are claimed on the website, but without methodology/context.
- Context (version/date/how measured): not specified.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://chainaware.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): numbers without methodology/context are not sufficient for AI_3 per the SSOT.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the reviewed Tier‑1 sources contain no sufficient tech description/architecture of the model.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: BNB Smart Chain
- Addresses/identifiers: AWARE token contract = 0xcf221109f45854ac52159420c543757fe84c113a
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xcf221109f45854ac52159420c543757fe84c113a
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 onchain page of the token confirms the address and the network.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: no confirmation was found that the product’s onchain logic is more than just the token.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the core product is described as an offchain service on top of onchain data.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a token, ChainAware.ai (AWARE), on the BNB Smart Chain network.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xcf221109f45854ac52159420c543757fe84c113a
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): bscscan confirms the token/ticker/address.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation of mandatory payment for the service with the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): not established.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): it is not established that the token is used in incentive/collateral/penalty mechanisms.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation of governance via the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): not established.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the replaceability/irreplaceability of the token is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://chainaware.ai/ | Description of the product: AI agents/scoring/tools (wallet auditor, fraud/rugpull detection) and availability of the web interface. |
| Tier‑1 | https://learn.chainaware.ai/how-to-use-chainaware.ai | List of features/usage scenarios (fraud detection, wallet auditor, credit score, etc.). |
| Tier‑1 | https://bscscan.com/token/0xcf221109f45854ac52159420c543757fe84c113a | Onchain fact of the ChainAware.ai (AWARE) token: address, network, max supply. |
No comments to display
No comments to display