BullBear AI
BullBear AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
BullBear AI — an AI/Analytics project on Arbitrum One, token (symbol: AIBB).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a service with forecasting/game tools around bull/bear market regimes.
- Who it’s for: retail users who need a “quick signal” and game mechanics.
- Why onchain/token: AIBB is used for staking/incentives and participation in ecosystem features (including governance) and is tied to the Arbitrum EVM infrastructure.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: connects a wallet and interacts with the BullBear AI products (games/platform mechanics).
- The system does: provides AI‑oriented signals/tools and accrues/accounts for participation in the ecosystem mechanics.
- The user gets: access to features and (if provided for by the product rules) in‑game/ecosystem rewards.
- Where the blockchain is: the onchain layer is used as the token and the point of accounting for ownership/transfer, as well as the base layer for staking/interactions with the token contract.
- Token role (if any): AIBB — utility/staking/possible governance within the BullBear AI ecosystem.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | BullBear AI |
| Also known as (aliases) | AIBB, BullBear |
| Logo (logo) | — |
| Token symbol (ticker) | AIBB |
| Category | AI/Analytics | DeFi |
| Primary chain (chain) | Arbitrum One |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | L2 (Optimistic Rollup, Arbitrum One on Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0xb9af4762c039d63e30039f1712dfab77026408c7 |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (payments + staking + governance) |
| Max supply | 100,000,000,000,000,000 AIBB (max supply); 3,000,000,000,000,000 AIBB (max total supply; burned excluded) |
| Issuance | burn |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | 97% was burned; 2% added to LP for DEX |
| Governance | token governance (staking/voting within the product) |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | yes |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI bull/bear regime forecasting (off-chain) |
| Use‑case (use_case) | signals/games around bull/bear markets |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 1 / 1 / 2 / 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://bull-bear.ai/ |
| Docs | https://docs.bull-bear.ai |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | https://twitter.com/bullbear_ai |
| Whitepaper | https://docs.bull-bear.ai/ |
| Roadmap | https://bull-bear.ai/roadmap |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://arbiscan.io/token/0xb9af4762c039d63e30039f1712dfab77026408c7 |
| X | https://twitter.com/bullbear_ai |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/ai_bullbeargroup |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | https://app.solidproof.io/projects/bull-bear |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bullbear-ai |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bullbear-ai/ |
General project overview
BullBear AI describes itself as a product that uses AI approaches to classify bull/bear market regimes based on user behavior and price action, and also as an ecosystem with products/mechanics and the AIBB token on the Arbitrum One network.
Features/modules
- AI‑oriented signals/assessments of the bull/bear regime (as claimed in the documentation).
- Product mechanics of the ecosystem (the documentation mentions games/activities and staking as an element of participation).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user studies the bull/bear signals/assessments → gets a reference point for further analysis.
- Scenario 2: a user participates in game/ecosystem activities where, per the rules, AIBB staking is required → gets access/participation and possible rewards per the product mechanics.
- Scenario 3: a user participates in governance processes (if available) → votes on proposals related to BullBear AI features.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an EVM wallet.
- Network/chain: Arbitrum One.
- Fees: Arbitrum network fees for onchain operations (transfers/interactions with contracts).
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the AIBB token (ERC‑20) + the offchain part of the product (the documentation mentions training the AI on historical data).
- Participant roles: product users; token holders/stakers.
- Where logic runs: the AI computations are claimed to be offchain; onchain — token ownership/transfer and, probably, part of the mechanics via smart contracts (not confirmed per Tier‑1 sources by module addresses other than the token).
- Dependencies: — (not established per Tier‑1 sources).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: AIBB is described as the utility token of the ecosystem; the tokenomics mentions a “medium of exchange”, staking and participation in the products.
- Protocol necessity drivers: staking as a requirement for participation in certain activities; incentives/rewards for participants; governance processes.
- Who pays fees: users of the Arbitrum network for onchain operations.
- Where fees go: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
- Issuance/burn: a large token burn is described; the supply/burned volumes are given in the documentation.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: the documentation describes staking as a “commitment” mechanism and mentions deductions for dishonest behavior.
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: the tokenomics describes the shares (including burned and LP).
- Treasury: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
Governance
- Who makes decisions: token governance within the product (per the tokenomics description).
- How protocol parameters change: via proposals and voting (the weight depends on staking), according to the tokenomics description.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
- Keys/multisig: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
Security and incidents
- Audits: an audit page (Solidproof) is published at the provided link.
- Bug bounty: — (no public program was found via the provided links).
- Incidents: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
- Threat model: per the available materials, the AI part is not accompanied by metrics and an architectural description; there also remain the risks of the smart contracts and staking mechanics, if they are implemented onchain.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: mainnet (the token is on Arbitrum One).
- Key releases/milestones: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
- Roadmap: there is a separate roadmap page on the website.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
- Partners: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
- Where it’s actually used: within the BullBear AI product mechanics (as claimed in the documentation); external integrations are not confirmed.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? The documentation claims that AI is used to predict bull/bear markets based on user behavior and price dynamics.
- What is truly onchain? The publicly confirmable onchain part is the AIBB token on Arbitrum One; additional onchain modules/contracts of the product are not confirmed by addresses per Tier‑1 sources.
- Why is a token needed? In the documentation, the AIBB token is described as a utility token for staking/incentives and governance within the ecosystem.
- Red flags (based on the information found): if the AI signals are not reproducible/have no quality metrics; if the “products” boil down to the token without confirmed onchain logic other than the ERC‑20.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 1 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | medium | 2 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI intent is not singled out separately as a roadmap intention; instead, there is a description of the product’s AI feature.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): For BullBear AI it is more appropriate to record AI_1 (a description of the AI feature) rather than intent without a feature.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): It is claimed that AI predicts bull/bear markets based on user behavior and price action.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 documentation explicitly describes the AI feature and its purpose.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A public demo/guide that shows the operation of the AI signals in a reproducible form was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The available Tier‑1 links contain a description and product sections, but there is no explicit “what you can touch” for the AI part.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No quantitative quality metrics/benchmarks were found in the available documentation.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A technical architecture/model versions at a level sufficient for independent verification were not found per Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation contains descriptions of the product and the token, but does not provide a verifiable architecture of the AI models.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Arbitrum One
- Addresses/identifiers: the AIBB token: 0xb9af4762c039d63e30039f1712dfab77026408c7
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://arbiscan.io/token/0xb9af4762c039d63e30039f1712dfab77026408c7
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a public onchain identifier (the token contract) in the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: No confirmation (addresses/specifications) of separate product contracts other than the token contract was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/tokenomics/aibb
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a description of staking/products, but without onchain addresses/proof of the implementation of “useful logic” on the chain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: no Tier‑1 justification that the key properties of the product break down without the blockchain was found per Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The product descriptions do not formalize the necessity of trustless execution/accounting as a critical property.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a claimed token, AIBB.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/tokenomics/aibb
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation specifies the ticker and the token contract.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): AIBB is described as a medium of exchange between participants within the BullBear AI ecosystem.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/tokenomics/aibb
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The tokenomics directly speaks of a “medium of exchange” within the ecosystem.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): Participation in certain activities requires AIBB staking; deductions/reductions for dishonest behavior are described.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/tokenomics/aibb
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The tokenomics contains a description of staking as a “commitment” mechanism and of penalties.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): AIBB is described as a token for proposing and voting on governance proposals (the weight depends on staking).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/tokenomics/aibb
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The tokenomics directly describes the governance use.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 proof of an onchain mechanism that requires specifically AIBB and cannot be replaced with another asset/subscription was found per Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.bull-bear.ai/tokenomics/aibb
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The tokenomics describes utility and incentives, but does not prove the irreplaceability of the token at the protocol level.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://docs.bull-bear.ai/ | Tier‑1 description: BullBear AI claims an AI forecast of bull/bear markets and the purpose of the product. |
| Tier‑1 | https://docs.bull-bear.ai/tokenomics/aibb | Tier‑1 description of the AIBB token utility (staking/incentives/governance), max supply and distribution. |
| Tier‑1 | https://arbiscan.io/token/0xb9af4762c039d63e30039f1712dfab77026408c7 | Tier‑1 onchain fact: the AIBB token contract on Arbitrum One. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is a public demo/guide showing the operation of the AI signals” was found per Tier‑1 sources. |
| Tier‑2 | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bullbear-ai | Tier‑2 token profile/metadata and links (context). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bullbear-ai/ | Tier‑2 token profile/metadata and links (context). |
No comments to display
No comments to display