GDAI Agent
GDAI Agent — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
GDAI Agent — an AI/Other | Meme project on the Solana network, token.
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: the onchain fact of the existence of an SPL token is confirmed per Tier‑1; a Tier‑1 link between this mint and GhostDrive/other products is not established.
- Who it’s for: not established (no Tier‑1).
- Why onchain/token: onchain = issuance/accounting/transfers of the token on the Solana network; the role of the token in the product is not established.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: interacts with the SPL token (receiving/transferring/holding).
- The system does: the Solana network records the token state and transactions.
- The user gets: onchain confirmation of ownership/transfers.
- Where the blockchain is: the token mint and operations with it — onchain on Solana.
- Token role (if any): not established (no Tier‑1 description of utility/necessity).
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | GDAI Agent |
| Also known as (aliases) | — |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/881_gdai-agent_logo.png |
| Token symbol (ticker) | CGAI (self‑reported) |
| Category | AI/Other | Meme |
| Primary chain (chain) | Solana |
| Type | non-EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Solana) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | — |
| Token (standard) | SPL |
| Token contract | DD8GJwAZHZZsLEtKnxdWfm8JbBhUj1oVwiGigfPUpump |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | unknown |
| Use‑case (use_case) | unknown |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 0 / 1 / 0 / 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://ghostdrive.com/gdai |
| Docs | https://docs.ghostdrive.com/ |
| GitHub | https://github.com/Ghost-Drive |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://explorer.solana.com/address/DD8GJwAZHZZsLEtKnxdWfm8JbBhUj1oVwiGigfPUpump |
| X | https://twitter.com/GDAIAgent |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/ghostdrive_web3_chat |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/cgai |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/gdai-agent/ |
General project overview
Only the onchain fact of the existence of an SPL token on the Solana network is confirmed per Tier‑1 sources. Meanwhile, links to GhostDrive appear in open sources, but a Tier‑1 link between this specific SPL mint and GhostDrive is not established; moreover, the official GhostDrive tokenomics documentation describes the GD token on the TON network, which conflicts with the current SPL mint (and requires separate verification of the brand/ticker correspondence).
Features/modules
- Not established (no Tier‑1 description of the product).
Typical scenarios
- Not established (no Tier‑1 description of the product).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a wallet that supports Solana.
- Network/chain: Solana.
- Fees: Solana network fees for transfers/operations.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the SPL token (mint) on the Solana network.
- Participant roles: token holders and Solana network participants.
- Where logic runs: issuance/accounting/transfers of the token — onchain on Solana.
- Dependencies: Solana RPC/wallets/infrastructure.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: not established (no Tier‑1).
- Protocol necessity drivers: not established (no Tier‑1).
- Who pays fees: users of the Solana network.
- Where fees go: to the Solana network validators (per the network rules).
- Issuance/burn: —.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: —.
- Treasury: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: —.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: risks are typical for tokens and wallet/RPC infrastructure; without a Tier‑1 description of the product, the threat model is not established.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: mainnet (based on the fact of the token’s existence on the network).
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: —.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? not established (no Tier‑1 description of an AI component).
- What is truly onchain? The SPL token on the Solana network (mint and transactions — onchain).
- Why is a token needed? not established (no Tier‑1 description of utility/necessity).
- Red flags (based on the information found): AI labels without a Tier‑1 tech description/demo/metrics; reducing the “onchain part” to token issuance; absence of verifiable product artifacts.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | no Tier‑1 data | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | low (token only) | 1 |
| Token necessity | not established | 0 |
| Evidence | partial Tier‑1 | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 declaration of AI intent (linked specifically to this SPL mint) was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ghostdrive.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no verifiable Tier‑1 artifact with an AI roadmap/intent.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): what exactly the AI does is not established (no Tier‑1 description).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ghostdrive.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 description of the AI feature, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): demos/examples of the AI in operation (linked specifically to this SPL mint) were not found in Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ghostdrive.com/gdai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 demo/example → 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: not found.
- Context (version/date/how measured): not found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ghostdrive.com/gdai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 metrics/context → 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the tech description/architecture of the AI component (linked specifically to this SPL mint) was not found in Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ghostdrive.com/gdai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 tech description, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Solana
- Addresses/identifiers: mint = DD8GJwAZHZZsLEtKnxdWfm8JbBhUj1oVwiGigfPUpump
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/DD8GJwAZHZZsLEtKnxdWfm8JbBhUj1oVwiGigfPUpump
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the block explorer confirms the token address on the network.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/DD8GJwAZHZZsLEtKnxdWfm8JbBhUj1oVwiGigfPUpump
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Onchain logic beyond the token is not recorded in Tier‑1 sources.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established (no Tier‑1 description of the product).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ghostdrive.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 justification of criticality, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the token exists (SPL on Solana).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/DD8GJwAZHZZsLEtKnxdWfm8JbBhUj1oVwiGigfPUpump
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is identified by the mint address.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): not established (no Tier‑1 description of payment utility).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ghostdrive.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 description of utility, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): not established (no Tier‑1).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ghostdrive.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of incentives/collateral.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): not established (no Tier‑1).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ghostdrive.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of governance.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): not established (no Tier‑1 allowing replaceability to be assessed).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ghostdrive.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): with insufficient data, we set 0 (conservatively).
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://explorer.solana.com/address/DD8GJwAZHZZsLEtKnxdWfm8JbBhUj1oVwiGigfPUpump | The SPL token address (mint) on the Solana network (onchain fact). |
| Tier‑2 | https://solscan.io/token/DD8GJwAZHZZsLEtKnxdWfm8JbBhUj1oVwiGigfPUpump | Alternative explorer (context/viewing convenience). |
| Tier‑1 | https://ghostdrive.com/gdai | GhostDrive page (positioning/architecture; does not confirm a link to this SPL mint). |
| Tier‑1 | https://docs.ghostdrive.com/ | GhostDrive documentation (context; does not confirm a link to this SPL mint). |
| Tier‑1 | https://token.ghostdrive.com/ | GhostDrive tokenomics: the GD token is listed on the TON network (records the conflict with the current SPL mint). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/gdai-agent/ | Reference profile: ticker (CGAI, self‑reported), supply (self‑reported), links. |
No comments to display
No comments to display