Levels Protocol
Levels Protocol — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Levels Protocol — an AI/Other | Meme project on the Solana network, token (symbol: —).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a token on the Solana network; the product/protocol behind the token is not established per Tier‑1.
- Who it’s for: token holders and members of the project community.
- Why onchain/token: the onchain fact of the token’s existence is confirmed; useful onchain logic beyond the token is not established.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: sends/receives the token (onchain operations).
- The system does: validates and records the transaction on the Solana network.
- The user gets: a confirmed transaction and a change in the token balance.
- Where the blockchain is: accounting of token ownership and transaction history onchain.
- Token role (if any): the role of the token as a protocol utility is not established per Tier‑1.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Levels Protocol |
| Also known as (aliases) | LVLS |
| Logo (logo) | — |
| Token symbol (ticker) | — |
| Category | AI/Other | Meme |
| Primary chain (chain) | Solana |
| Type | non-EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Solana) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | — |
| Token (standard) | SPL |
| Token contract | 1FPs2RTXvLzW9r9MgRYfGgNJt4wcDUc3FpMeRpQLVLS |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | token on Solana |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://www.levelsprotocol.gg/ |
| Docs | — |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://solscan.io/token/1FPs2RTXvLzW9r9MgRYfGgNJt4wcDUc3FpMeRpQLVLS |
| X | https://twitter.com/life_lvls |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/LifeLVLSPortal |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | — |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/levelsprotocol/ |
General project overview
Levels Protocol is a token on the Solana network. No confirmation was found per Tier‑1 sources of what product/protocol is behind the token or which part of “AI” is verifiable (rather than just a name).
Features/modules
- Token: a mint address exists on the Solana network (verifiable via the explorer).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user performs operations with the token → transactions are observable in the explorer.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a Solana wallet.
- Network/chain: Solana.
- Fees: Solana network fees for operations.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the token (SPL) on the Solana network.
- Participant roles: token holders.
- Where logic runs: onchain — operations with the token; the rest — not established.
- Dependencies: —.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: — (not established per Tier‑1).
- Issuance/burn: — (not established per Tier‑1).
Governance
- Who makes decisions: — (not established per Tier‑1).
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: —.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? Not established: no Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found.
- What is truly onchain? The token on the Solana network (the mint address is observable in the explorer).
- Why is a token needed? Not established per Tier‑1.
- Red flags (based on the information found): AI labels without verifiable Tier‑1 artifacts; onchain boils down to the token.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | no data | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 partial | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 AI declaration/roadmap was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a Tier‑1 record of intent, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A description of AI features is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a description of AI features, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A demo of AI features is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no demo, so 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —.
- Context (version/date/how measured): —.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Metrics were not found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Tier‑1: no tech description of the AI part was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a tech description, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Solana
- Addresses/identifiers: mint: 1FPs2RTXvLzW9r9MgRYfGgNJt4wcDUc3FpMeRpQLVLS
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/1FPs2RTXvLzW9r9MgRYfGgNJt4wcDUc3FpMeRpQLVLS
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Onchain fact: the token and mint address on a public network.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: Not established (other than the token).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no confirmation, so 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established (per Tier‑1).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no justification of onchain criticality, so 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token (mint) on the Solana network.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/1FPs2RTXvLzW9r9MgRYfGgNJt4wcDUc3FpMeRpQLVLS
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token is confirmed by the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of payment for services with the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without evidence, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no proof, so 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A governance role of the token is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description, so 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without justification, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://www.levelsprotocol.gg/ | Official project website (Tier‑1 entry point). |
| Tier‑1 | https://solscan.io/token/1FPs2RTXvLzW9r9MgRYfGgNJt4wcDUc3FpMeRpQLVLS | Onchain fact: the token mint address on the Solana network. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “AI component in the product” was found. |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/levelsprotocol/ | Reference token profile (context). |
No comments to display
No comments to display