Skip to main content

Genie AI Live

Genie AI Live — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Genie AI Live — an AI/Agents | Infra project on the Ethereum network.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a platform positioned as an open‑source solution for building, deploying and monitoring “agentic systems” (AI agents).
  • Who it’s for: teams/developers who need templates and infrastructure for running and maintaining AI agents.
  • Why onchain/token: the existence of the token on the Ethereum network is confirmed per Tier‑1; the necessity of onchain/the token for the platform’s operation is not established.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The developer does: builds/configures an AI agent (claimed: memory, knowledge, tools).
  2. The system does: helps “ship” (deployment) and “monitor” (observation/metrics/evaluations) the operation of agentic systems.
  3. The developer receives: an infrastructure setup for running and maintaining AI agents.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the onchain fact of the token on the Ethereum network is confirmed; the platform’s connection to onchain is not established per Tier‑1.
  5. Token role (if any): no strict description of a mandatory role of the token in the product logic was found per Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Genie AI Live
Also known as (aliases) Genie AI
Logo (logo) ../assets/835_genie-ai-live_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) GENIE
Category AI/Agents | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x60d95823F795F1972dBDbcd886955095E36E04Cd
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 10 000 000 GENIE
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) Total supply: 10M; decimals: 9; taxes: 5% marketing / 3% development / 2% team.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) platform for agentic systems (agents + memory/tools)
Use‑case (use_case) build + deploy + monitor AI agents
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

On the Genie AI Live website, the project describes itself as an open‑source platform to “build, ship and monitor agentic systems”. The documentation (GitBook) describes the basic concepts and goals: domain‑oriented AI agents, memory/knowledge integration and tools, as well as maintenance (monitoring/optimization).

Per Tier‑1 sources within this card, it is not established that onchain is a critically necessary component of the platform (OC_3=0); the onchain part is confirmed only at the level of the token’s existence on Ethereum.

Features/modules

  • Agent studio (claimed): building domain agents with memory/knowledge/tools.
  • Deployment options (claimed): deployment scenarios (described in the documentation).
  • Monitoring and optimization (claimed): monitoring and improving the operation of agentic systems.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a team designs and configures an agent → deploys it in its own environment → observes/evaluates its operation.
  • Scenario 2: a team adds knowledge/tools → improves the agent’s behavior based on monitoring and evaluations.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: project documentation and a deployment environment (BYOC; claimed).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum — only for operations with the token.
  • Fees: Ethereum fees for onchain operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the platform/documentation (GitBook) + the onchain token (ERC‑20) on Ethereum.
  • Where logic runs: agentic systems and their execution — offchain; the token — onchain.
  • Dependencies: not established per Tier‑1 (other than public domains/documentation pages).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 (tokenomics parameters were found in Tier‑1 sources, but not a mandatory role of the token in the product logic).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: no strict explanation of “without the token the product breaks down” was found per Tier‑1.
  • Fees: Ethereum fees for onchain operations with the token.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Incidents: not established per Tier‑1.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the documentation and website are available.
  • Key releases/milestones: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Roadmap: given on the official website (see links_*).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Partners: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Per Tier‑1, the project describes agentic systems and AI agents with memory/knowledge/tools, as well as building/deployment/monitoring processes.
  • What is truly onchain? The token contract on Ethereum and its onchain data (explorer).
  • Why is a token needed? Tokenomics parameters (total supply/decimals/taxes) were found per Tier‑1, but no clear explanation of a mandatory role of the token in the platform was found.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): there are no Tier‑1 quality metrics for the AI component; there is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality (OC_3=0).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The AI part is described as a product/platform, not just as “intent”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 applies to “intent without a product”; here there is a Tier‑1 description of the platform/agents.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): A platform for AI agents (agentic systems) with memory, knowledge and tools.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genieai.live/ ; https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 sources explicitly describe the purpose of the AI part (agents + their capabilities).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No public demo/application with reproducible steps was found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genieai.live/ ; https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_2=1 requires an explicit demo/app/guide for “what you can touch”; this is not established per the available links.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No benchmarks/quality metrics for the AI part were found per Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The documentation describes concepts and sections on building/deploying/monitoring AI agents.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Tier‑1 tech description of the product at the level of concepts and modules.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0x60d95823F795F1972dBDbcd886955095E36E04Cd (token contract)
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x60d95823F795F1972dBDbcd886955095E36E04Cd
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Explorer confirms the onchain existence of the token on the Ethereum network.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: no confirmation of the product’s onchain logic other than the token was found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genieai.live/ ; https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Addresses/docs on contracts and functions used by the platform are required; not established.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): OC_3=1 requires an explicit Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality; not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token (ERC‑20) on the Ethereum network.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x60d95823F795F1972dBDbcd886955095E36E04Cd
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Explorer confirms the token contract.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The payment role of the token for using the platform is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): TK_1=1 requires an explicit Tier‑1 “what the token is used to pay for”; not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Mechanisms of incentives/collateral/penalties are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No description of token incentive mechanics was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A governance role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 description of governance mechanics was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): TK_4=1 requires an explicit justification; not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://genieai.live/ Tier‑1 description: a platform for building/deploying/monitoring agentic systems (AI agents).
Tier‑1 https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs Documentation: concepts and sections on agents (building/deployment/monitoring).
Tier‑1 https://genie-ai.gitbook.io/genie-docs/tokenomics Tokenomics: token name $GENIE; total supply 10M; decimals 9; taxes breakdown.
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x60d95823F795F1972dBDbcd886955095E36E04Cd Onchain fact: the token contract on the Ethereum network.
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/genie-ai-live/ Profile/aggregator (for reference; not Tier‑1 proof).

No comments to display

Back to top