Skip to main content

Neurolanche (NEROX)

Neurolanche (NEROX) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Neurolanche (NEROX) — an AI/Other | Gaming project, token (symbol: NEROX).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: the NEROX token, claimed as a utility token of the Neurolanche ecosystem (including projects with AI and GameFi components).
  • Who it’s for: users/participants of the Neurolanche ecosystem (per the description on the website).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain records the issuance/transfers of the token; product usage scenarios for the token in the ecosystem are described per Tier‑1 sources (for example, in ZkStrike).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: holds/transfers the NEROX token and (possibly) uses ecosystem products.
  2. The system does: executes standard ERC‑20 contract logic on the Optimism network (OP Mainnet).
  3. The user gets: onchain accounting of balances/transfers of the token.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the token contract and its events/transactions.
  5. Token role: claimed as the ecosystem’s “utility token”; the Tier‑1 documentation describes usage scenarios (for example, chest purchases / staking / bets / marketplace in ZkStrike).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Neurolanche (NEROX)
Also known as (aliases) NEROX
Logo (logo) ../assets/828_nerox-ai_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) NEROX
Category AI/Other | Gaming
Primary chain (chain) Optimism
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) L2 (Optimistic Rollup, Optimism on Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xD42Fe55e8A43b546aA75fdA6483073be1d7EF74c
Token model (token_type) utility (in-ecosystem usage)
Max supply 10,000,000 NEROX
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI assistants in ecosystem
Use‑case (use_case) utility token for AI/GameFi ecosystem
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the Tier‑1 website, Neurolanche X Labs positions itself as an organization developing projects at the intersection of blockchain and AI (for example, AI assistants and gaming products) and using the NEROX token as the ecosystem’s “utility token”. The ecosystem’s Tier‑1 documentation (GitBook) describes usage scenarios for the token (for example, for chest purchases, staking and bets in ZkStrike).

Features/modules

  • Firolauss AI (claimed): an AI assistant, claimed to “understand emotions and behavior”.
  • ZkStrike (claimed): a multiplayer FPS game with web3 elements.
  • NEROX token: claimed as the ecosystem’s key utility token.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user holds/transfers the NEROX token → onchain records the transfer.
  • Scenario 2: a user interacts with ecosystem products → the token’s role in access/incentives requires Tier‑1 confirmation.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet for the token; access to the project’s websites/channels (see links_*).
  • Network/chain: Optimism (OP Mainnet) for the token.
  • Fees: Optimism network fees for transactions.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the NEROX token contract on Optimism + offchain products/applications (details not verified in this card).
  • Participant roles: token holders, users of ecosystem applications.
  • Where logic runs: token accounting — onchain; AI/game logic — offchain (per the website description).
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility (Tier‑1): the ZkStrike documentation describes the use of NEROX for chest purchases, a staking mechanism and a betting system (as well as operations in the NFT store/marketplace); a burn mechanism is also claimed for some scenarios.
  • Issuance: max total supply 10,000,000 NEROX (Tier‑1, explorer).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not established).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Incidents: not found per Tier‑1 sources.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (there is a website and a token).
  • Roadmap: not verified per Tier‑1 sources.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not verified per Tier‑1 sources.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The Tier‑1 website claims AI assistants (for example, Firolauss AI) and an AI part of the ecosystem.
  • What is truly onchain? The NEROX ERC‑20 token on Optimism (Tier‑1, explorer).
  • Why is a token needed? Claimed as the ecosystem’s utility token; the Tier‑1 ZkStrike documentation describes usage scenarios (chests / staking / bets / marketplace).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): a high risk of “token‑washing” until a Tier‑1 description of the token’s specific functions appears (the whitepaper was not extracted in this card).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI intent is not singled out separately, because there is a Tier‑1 description of the AI part (AI_1).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.neurolanche.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): we use AI_1 as the basis instead of intent.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI assistants (for example, Firolauss AI) and AI functionality in the Neurolanche ecosystem are claimed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.neurolanche.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 website describes an AI assistant and the ecosystem’s AI positioning.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): demos/examples of operation are not verified per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no direct link to an app/demo in links_*, and the whitepaper is unavailable without logging in.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: no Tier‑1 quality metrics/benchmarks were found.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no published metrics per the SSOT definition.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the tech description/architecture/versions of the AI part are not confirmed per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper was not extracted; the repository relates to the token, not the AI model.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Optimism (OP Mainnet)
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0xD42Fe55e8A43b546aA75fdA6483073be1d7EF74c
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://optimistic.etherscan.io/token/0xD42Fe55e8A43b546aA75fdA6483073be1d7EF74c
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token contract is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1 sources (other than the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): other contracts/protocol logic are not verified.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): “criticality” is not proven.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, NEROX (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://optimistic.etherscan.io/token/0xD42Fe55e8A43b546aA75fdA6483073be1d7EF74c
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is established per the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The ZkStrike documentation describes the use of NEROX for purchases/payments within the ecosystem (for example, chest purchases).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurolanche-x-labs.gitbook.io/zkstrike-web3-multiplayer-fps-game
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 explicitly describes NEROX as a token used to purchase in‑game objects/access via the chest system.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The ZkStrike documentation describes a staking mechanism and rewards in NEROX (for example, clans earning NEROX rewards).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurolanche-x-labs.gitbook.io/zkstrike-web3-multiplayer-fps-game
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes staking/rewards linked to the NEROX token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the use of the token in governance is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.neurolanche.com Tier‑1: AI assistants/an AI part of the ecosystem and the thesis “NEROX is a utility token ... pivotal to the Neurolanche ecosystem” are claimed.
Tier‑1 https://optimistic.etherscan.io/token/0xD42Fe55e8A43b546aA75fdA6483073be1d7EF74c Onchain fact: the Neurolanche (NEROX) ERC‑20 token on OP Mainnet; max total supply 10,000,000 NEROX.
Tier‑1 https://neurolanche-x-labs.gitbook.io/zkstrike-web3-multiplayer-fps-game Token utility: chest purchases, a staking mechanism, bets and marketplace scenarios using NEROX.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the governance role of the token (voting/DAO)” was found per the available sources.

No comments to display

Back to top