Skip to main content

Yahtzee DAO

Yahtzee DAO — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Yahtzee DAO — a project with a token on Solana (SPL); the role of AI and the purpose of the product are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an SPL token on the Solana network (mint: 6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK).
  • Who it’s for: — (not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain records the issuance/transfers of the token; the practical usefulness of the token/product is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: holds/transfers the SPL token.
  2. The system does: executes standard token operations on Solana.
  3. The user gets: onchain accounting of balances/transfers.
  4. Where the blockchain is: Solana (the token mint and related transactions).
  5. Token role: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Yahtzee DAO
Also known as (aliases) Yahtzee
Logo (logo) ../assets/823_yahtzee-dao_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) HAIYEZ (self‑reported)
Category —
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) —
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract 6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) —
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

No Tier‑1 confirmation of the product/purpose description and the role of AI was found. Only the existence of the SPL token and the presence of channels are confirmed per Tier‑1. The website www.yachtzee.ai returns 404 on a direct request (content unavailable), so the website’s claims were not used as Tier‑1 evidence.

Features/modules

  • — (not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a token holder transfers the SPL token → onchain records the transfer.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a Solana wallet.
  • Network/chain: Solana.
  • Fees: Solana network fees for transactions.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the token’s SPL mint.
  • Participant roles: token holders, dApp users (if they exist; not established).
  • Where logic runs: onchain (Solana) for token accounting; an offchain product is not established.
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not established).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
  • Bug bounty: no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
  • Incidents: no Tier‑1 confirmation found.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? No Tier‑1 description of the AI component/features was found.
  • What is truly onchain? The SPL token on Solana (Tier‑1, explorer).
  • Why is a token needed? Not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing risk due to the absence of a verified Tier‑1 description of the product/AI features.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 partially present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A Tier‑1 declaration of AI intentions is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without Tier‑1 text, we conservatively set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): what exactly the AI does (if anything) is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 description was found/extracted.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): demos/examples of operation are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 demo/guide.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no Tier‑1 metrics/benchmarks.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the tech description/architecture of the AI part is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: 6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token mint is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of useful onchain logic other than the token is not verified.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not applicable/not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token on Solana (SPL).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is established per the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): it is not established that the token is used to pay for the service.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): A Tier‑1 description of the token utility is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the mechanics of incentives/collateral/penalties are not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the use of the token in governance is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://explorer.solana.com/address/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK Onchain fact: the token’s SPL mint on the Solana network.
Tier‑2 https://solscan.io/token/6hUC9DN73kdinkth3JdELGYnEbLEnEE4NvbzzoG3yPKK Alternative explorer (context/ease of viewing).
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/yahtzee-dao/ Reference profile: ticker (HAIYEZ, self‑reported), supply (self‑reported), links.
Tier‑1 https://www.yachtzee.ai/ The website in links_* is unavailable (404); a Tier‑1 description of the product/AI was not extracted.