ELYRAI
ELYRAI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
ELYRAI — an AI/Analytics project on the Solana network, token (symbol: —).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an AI agent/interface that claims token analysis and wallet analysis features for the Solana ecosystem.
- Who it’s for: Solana community members who need a quick “request” for a token or wallet analysis (per the description on the website).
- Why onchain/token: onchain is used for the token and Solana wallets/accounts; the utility role of the project’s token is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
- What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the
/chatweb page (claimed as an interaction surface) and the “Ask for a token analysis / wallet analysis” buttons (see Evidence).
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: requests a token or wallet analysis (via the website interface).
- The system does: produces a response/analysis (model/methodology details are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources).
- The user gets: a textual conclusion/insight about the object of analysis.
- Where the blockchain is: the entities being analyzed are onchain (Solana), plus the project’s SPL token.
- Token role: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | ELYRAI |
| Also known as (aliases) | Elyrai Agent |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/824_elyrai_logo.webp |
| Token symbol (ticker) | — |
| Category | AI/Analytics |
| Primary chain (chain) | Solana |
| Type | non-EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Solana) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | SPL |
| Token contract | 3t2LfNCAooGrQSzi45Ndg27X54TnsdbBv2So8FfrcL2k |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI agent for token/wallet analysis |
| Use‑case (use_case) | Solana token + wallet analysis |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://www.elyr.ai/ |
| Docs | https://t.me/ELYRAI_TERMINAL |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://solscan.io/token/3t2LfNCAooGrQSzi45Ndg27X54TnsdbBv2So8FfrcL2k |
| App / Demo | https://www.elyr.ai/chat |
| X | https://twitter.com/ElyraiAgent |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/ELYRAI_TERMINAL |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | — |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/elyrai/ |
General project overview
The project website positions ELYRAI as an AI agent for the Solana ecosystem, with public “Ask for a token analysis” and “Ask for a wallet analysis” buttons, as well as a /chat page. Which specific model/methodology is used and how the repeatability of results is ensured are not verified in this card.
Features/modules
- Token analysis (claimed): a request for a token analysis.
- Wallet analysis (claimed): a request for a wallet analysis.
- Chat surface: the
/chatpage as an entry point into the interface.
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user enters a token address → receives a textual analysis (claimed).
- Scenario 2: a user enters a wallet address → receives a textual analysis (claimed).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: open the website and use the interface (see
links_*). - Network/chain: Solana (objects of analysis and the project’s token).
- Fees: Solana fees apply to onchain actions; the cost/payment model of the service is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: web interface + offchain AI processing (details not established) + Solana onchain objects.
- Participant roles: users who request analysis.
- Where logic runs: AI output — offchain; onchain — the data source (Solana) and the token.
- Dependencies: — (not verified).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
- Protocol necessity drivers: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: — (not established).
Security and incidents
- Audits: no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
- Bug bounty: no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
- Incidents: no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the website labels the work as “Work in progress”.
- Roadmap: no Tier‑1 confirmation found.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: not verified (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? An AI agent that analyzes tokens and wallets is claimed (model/quality details are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources).
- What is truly onchain? Solana objects for analysis and the project’s SPL token (the mint is given in
links_*). - Why is a token needed? Not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
- Red flags (based on the information found): without a Tier‑1 tech description and quality metrics, it is difficult to distinguish “AI as marketing” from a reproducible AI component.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | medium | 2 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 partially present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI intent is not singled out as a separate flag in this card, because there is a more direct Tier‑1 description of the features (see AI_1).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.elyr.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): we use AI_1 as the basis (what the AI does), rather than “intent”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): an AI agent for token analysis and wallet analysis (Solana) is claimed.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.elyr.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 website directly describes two types of analysis as product features.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): there is a
/chatweb surface as an entry point for interaction (demo surface). - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.elyr.ai/chat
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): we record the presence of a public page/entry point as a demo surface.
- Conflict note (if any): the page content is dynamic; behavior/results require additional manual verification.
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: no Tier‑1 quality metrics/benchmarks were found.
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no published metrics per the SSOT definition.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the tech description/architecture/versions of the AI part are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): technical docs/repos are absent from
links_*. - Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Solana
- Addresses/identifiers: 3t2LfNCAooGrQSzi45Ndg27X54TnsdbBv2So8FfrcL2k
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/3t2LfNCAooGrQSzi45Ndg27X54TnsdbBv2So8FfrcL2k
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token mint is confirmed by the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources (other than the token).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no confirmed contracts/logic other than the token in
links_*. - Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): “criticality” is not proven.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a token on Solana (SPL).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/3t2LfNCAooGrQSzi45Ndg27X54TnsdbBv2So8FfrcL2k
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is established per the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): it is not established that the token is used to pay for the service.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 source on the token utility was found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the mechanics of incentives/collateral/penalties are not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the use of the token in governance is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://www.elyr.ai/ | Tier‑1: “token analysis” and “wallet analysis” features for the Solana community are claimed. |
| Tier‑1 | https://www.elyr.ai/chat | The public /chat surface as an entry point for interaction (AI_2 demo surface). |
| Tier‑1 | https://solscan.io/token/3t2LfNCAooGrQSzi45Ndg27X54TnsdbBv2So8FfrcL2k | Onchain fact: the SPL mint of the project’s token on the Solana network. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “why is a token needed (utility/role in the protocol)” was found. |
No comments to display
No comments to display