Skip to main content

GX3.AI

GX3.AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

GX3.AI — an AI/Compute project on Ethereum, token (symbol: —).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: the website claims a “decentralized compute marketplace” (including for AI workloads); Tier‑1 documentation is available in links_*.
  • Who it’s for: users/teams that need computational resources (claimed; per Tier‑1 without details of user scenarios).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is confirmed at the token/contract level on Ethereum; the token utility is not established in Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: uses the compute marketplace (details are not established per Tier‑1).
  2. The system does: improvement of marketplace performance/security is claimed (details not established).
  3. The user gets: not established (Tier‑1).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the token/contract on Ethereum.
  5. Token role (if any): not established in Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name GX3.AI
Also known as (aliases) GX3
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) —
Category AI/Compute | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xB7D29Ec03d87dcd5D6F6EA39a855d5566E6c8f36
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) compute marketplace for AI/ML workloads
Use‑case (use_case) access to compute
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 1
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

GX3.AI reports on its public page that the team is improving a “decentralized compute marketplace” (including for AI workloads). The Tier‑1 documentation describes the project’s context/motivation (cloud computing + GPU services + the role of AI in automation); the token contract on Ethereum remains the verifiable artifact.

Features/modules

  • Compute marketplace (claimed): claimed on the website.
  • Documentation: available (see links_*).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: using the compute marketplace → the result is not established (no Tier‑1 “getting started”/guide).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: not established (no Tier‑1 getting started was found).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (token/contract).
  • Fees: Ethereum network fees for operations with the token/contract.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: only the token contract is confirmed.
  • Participant roles: —.
  • Where logic runs: not established.
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established (no Tier‑1).
  • Issuance/burn: not established.
  • Distribution: not established.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not established.
  • Bug bounty: not established.
  • Incidents: not established.
  • Threat model: not established.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (based on the website/social media and the token’s onchain artifact).
  • Roadmap: not established.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not established.
  • Partners: not established.
  • Where it’s actually used: not established.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Tier‑1 claims a compute marketplace mentioning AI workloads; specific AI features/metrics are not established.
  • What is truly onchain? the token contract on Ethereum is confirmed via the explorer.
  • Why is a token needed? not established per Tier‑1.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): A Tier‑1 tech description/metrics of AI are not established; onchain looks like “token only” (OC_2=0).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 1
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The website claims that the product is a decentralized compute marketplace (AI workloads are mentioned).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is Tier‑1 intent/positioning about AI applicability, without technical proof (AI_1..AI_4 remain 0).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): What exactly the AI does (models/agents/metrics) is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 contains only a brief description without specifics of the AI component.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No public link to an application/demo was found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website is under maintenance; a demo surface is not established.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Metrics/benchmarks were not found in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A technical description/architecture is not established in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation in links_* was not available (unavailable per the available sources).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0xB7D29Ec03d87dcd5D6F6EA39a855d5566E6c8f36
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xB7D29Ec03d87dcd5D6F6EA39a855d5566E6c8f36
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a verifiable onchain artifact (the token contract).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xB7D29Ec03d87dcd5D6F6EA39a855d5566E6c8f36
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 description of protocol onchain logic was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token (contract on Ethereum).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xB7D29Ec03d87dcd5D6F6EA39a855d5566E6c8f36
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is verifiable via the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): “Payment for the service” with the token is not established in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit Tier‑1 description of payment/fees with the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Mechanics of token‑based incentives/collateral/penalties are not established in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit description of incentives/staking/slashing.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The governance mechanics of the token are not established in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit description of governance/voting with the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token (for example, with payment in a stablecoin) is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gx3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit statement/justification of replaceability.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://gx3.ai/ Mention of a “decentralized compute marketplace” and the context of improvements (maintenance).
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xB7D29Ec03d87dcd5D6F6EA39a855d5566E6c8f36 Onchain artifact: the token contract on Ethereum.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source on the token utility was found.