Skip to main content

OpenAI tokenized stock (Robinhood)

OpenAI tokenized stock (Robinhood) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

OpenAI tokenized stock (Robinhood) — a DeFi project on Arbitrum One, token (symbol: —).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a tokenized financial instrument (based on the meaning of the name and the available links; details need to be double‑checked against Tier‑1 documents).
  • Who it’s for: users of the Robinhood (EU) service (context from links_*).
  • Why onchain/token: Robinhood describes “Stock Tokens” as derivative contracts tracked on the blockchain; the applicability of this description to the specific contract in links_* requires separate matching per Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: completes onboarding for Stock Tokens in Robinhood EU; private company stock tokens may be credited as a promotional reward (per the help‑center terms).
  2. The system does: not established (Tier‑1).
  3. The user gets: not established (Tier‑1).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the token/contract on Arbitrum One.
  5. Token role (if any): not established in Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name OpenAI tokenized stock (Robinhood)
Also known as (aliases) Robinhood (EU)
Logo (logo) ../assets/899_openai-tokenized-stock-robinhood_logo.jpg
Token symbol (ticker) —
Category DeFi
Primary chain (chain) Arbitrum One
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) L2 (Optimistic Rollup, Arbitrum One on Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xc1753be9d4a7a9f7cade1cd010cb6c3b09e043fa
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) tokenized instrument
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 0
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

An ERC‑20 contract on the Arbitrum One network is given in links_*. Per the Tier‑1 page for this contract in the explorer, the token is labeled Demo 2 and contains the note “This was a test token deployed by Robinhood.” This creates a potential conflict with the card’s name and calls for caution: the connection of this specific contract to “OpenAI Private Company Stock Token” is not directly confirmed per Tier‑1.

Meanwhile, Robinhood’s Tier‑1 materials describe the “Stock Tokens” and “Private Company Stock Tokens” family as derivative contracts tracked on the blockchain that are not shares and do not confer rights to underlying shares; restrictions are also described for private company stock tokens (they cannot be sold/transferred until Robinhood enables the corresponding feature).

Features/modules

  • Token (ERC‑20): the onchain artifact is confirmed (Arbiscan).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: operations with the token (transfers/holding) → other scenarios are not established.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet; links to the service/documentation are in links_*.
  • Network/chain: Arbitrum One.
  • Fees: Arbitrum One network fees.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the token contract on the Arbitrum One network is confirmed (Tier‑1 explorer).
  • Participant roles: —.
  • Where logic runs: not established (Tier‑1).
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established for the specific contract per Tier‑1 (other than general descriptions of Stock Tokens/Private Company Stock Tokens in the help‑center).
  • Issuance/burn: not established.
  • Distribution: not established.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not established.
  • Bug bounty: not established.
  • Incidents: not established.
  • Threat model: not established.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (based on the onchain token artifact and public links).
  • Roadmap: not established.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not established.
  • Partners: not established.
  • Where it’s actually used: not established.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? not established (no Tier‑1 AI intent/description of an AI component was found).
  • What is truly onchain? the token contract on Arbitrum One is confirmed via the explorer.
  • Why is a token needed? not established (Tier‑1).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): a Tier‑1 description of the rights/tokenization mechanics for this token is absent; onchain looks like “token only” (OC_2=0).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 0
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 source on AI intent/roadmap was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 document/page where AI is described as intent.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): What exactly the AI does is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of AI features.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No public link to an application/demo was found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no demo surface that can be verified.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI metrics/benchmarks were not found in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A technical description/architecture is not established in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no available Tier‑1 documentation/repository.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Arbitrum One
  • Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0xc1753be9d4a7a9f7cade1cd010cb6c3b09e043fa
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://arbiscan.io/token/0xc1753be9d4a7a9f7cade1cd010cb6c3b09e043fa
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is an onchain artifact (the token contract) and a network explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://arbiscan.io/token/0xc1753be9d4a7a9f7cade1cd010cb6c3b09e043fa
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of protocol onchain logic.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token (contract on Arbitrum One).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://arbiscan.io/token/0xc1753be9d4a7a9f7cade1cd010cb6c3b09e043fa
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is verifiable via the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The token utility as payment for the service is not established in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of the token utility.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Mechanics of incentives/collateral/penalties are not established in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of incentives.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The governance mechanics of the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of governance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires explicit argumentation of replaceability.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://arbiscan.io/token/0xc1753be9d4a7a9f7cade1cd010cb6c3b09e043fa Onchain artifact: the token contract on the Arbitrum One network.
Tier‑1 https://docs.robinhood.com/ Service documentation (context; does not prove the token utility).
Tier‑1 https://cdn.robinhood.com/assets/robinhood/legal/description_of_services_financial_instruments_and_risks_eu.pdf Document on services/financial instruments and risks (context; requires precise matching to the token).
Tier‑1 https://robinhood.com/newsroom/robinhood-launches-stock-tokens-reveals-layer-2-blockchain-and-expands-crypto-suite-in-eu-and-us-with-perpetual-futures-and-staking/ Robinhood: Stock Tokens in the EU, “Stock tokens will initially be issued on Arbitrum.”
Tier‑1 https://robinhood.com/eu/en/support/articles/stock-token-giveaway Robinhood: “Private Company Stock Tokens” — derivative contracts (not shares), restrictions on sale/transfer; OpenAI tokens hedged via SPV (convertible notes) (terms).
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source on the AI component was found.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source on the token utility for the specific contract was found.

No comments to display

Back to top