Skip to main content

JoJoWorld

JoJoWorld (JOJO) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

JoJoWorld — an AI/Data / 3D data project, which a Tier‑2 source (CoinMarketCap) describes as a platform for collection/curation/annotation of 3D spatial data for training embodied AI / text‑to‑3D / “world models”, with token incentives for contributors who upload 3D assets/metadata. The onchain SSOT of the token in this card is BNB Smart Chain (BEP‑20): the JOJO contract on BscScan.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a platform that collects and improves 3D data (scans/photogrammetry/metadata) for further use in AI/robotics/simulation (per the CMC description).
  • Who it’s for: 3D creators (data contributors) and AI/robotics teams (consumers of datasets/integrations).
  • Why onchain/token: the JOJO token is used as incentives for contributors and as the economic layer of the ecosystem (per the CMC description); the onchain fact is the existence of the token/contract (BscScan).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The contributor does: uploads 3D assets/scans/photogrammetry and metadata (per CMC).
  2. The system does: “curate/annotate” and improves the data with pipelines (CMC mentions Gaussian Splatting + AI‑assisted auto‑labeling).
  3. The contributor receives: rewards in the token (per CMC).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the JOJO token exists as a BEP‑20 on BSC; no other onchain artifacts of the product are confirmed.
  5. Token role: incentives (rewards) and participation in the ecosystem economy (per CMC; the details of “exactly how” require the project’s primary docs).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name JoJoWorld
Also known as (aliases) JOJO
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) JOJO
Category AI/Data | AI/Robotics
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active (token onchain)
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x953783617a71A888F8b04f397F2c9e1a7c37Af7e
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 113,189,082 JOJO (BscScan Max Total Supply)
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys roles/whitelists in the contract (BscScan verified source)
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) unknown
Use‑case (use_case) unknown
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary 0 / 1 / 0 / 1
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

In the Tier‑2 description on CoinMarketCap, JoJoWorld is presented as a “spatial 3D data platform” that is meant to close the 3D data bottleneck for modern AI scenarios: robotics/simulations/generative models (text‑to‑3D) and “world models”. The logic of participation in the economy is described as crowdsourcing: participants upload raw 3D data (scans/photogrammetry) and metadata, after which the data goes through “curate/annotate” and becomes available to consumers.

The official website jojoworld.com did not load (unavailable per the available sources), so the technical details and confirmation of the claims are limited to the available Tier‑1 sources (BscScan/CMC).

Features/modules

  • Crowdsourcing 3D data: uploading 3D assets and metadata with rewards (CMC).
  • Curate/annotate pipeline: Gaussian Splatting pipelines and AI‑assisted auto‑labeling are claimed (CMC).
  • Token incentives: payouts in the JOJO token to contributors (CMC) + an onchain token (BscScan).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1 (contributor): uploads a 3D scan/photogrammetry → receives token rewards (CMC).
  • Scenario 2 (AI team): gets access to 3D data for training/simulation (CMC; access details not disclosed).
  • Scenario 3 (integrations): commercial agreements/integrations for data access (CMC).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an account/data upload tools (not confirmed; the website did not load).
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain (the JOJO token).
  • Fees: BSC fees for operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: an offchain platform for uploading/processing 3D data (not verified); onchain — the JOJO token (BscScan).
  • Participant roles: data contributors; data consumers (AI/robotics); token holders.
  • Where logic runs: data processing — offchain (per the CMC description); token accounting/payouts — onchain (BSC).
  • Dependencies: BSC RPC/infrastructure; compute pipelines for 3D processing (Gaussian splatting — claimed).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: rewards to contributors for 3D data (CMC); additional use‑cases are not confirmed.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: if the token is the main mechanism for incentivizing the supply of data, it is needed to scale the supply (per the design in the CMC description).
  • Who pays fees: BSC participants when transferring the token.
  • Where fees go: —.
  • Issuance/burn: supply conflict (CMC vs BscScan); without a primary document the model is not confirmed.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: incentives = rewards; the contract has access roles/whitelist/stage restrictions (BscScan verified source).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: —.
  • Treasury: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: —.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: X/Telegram (links_*).
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (CMC shows a certik redirect, but no Tier‑1 report was found).
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: risks of centralization of the offchain pipelines and of data quality; risks of the token/admin roles/transfer restrictions.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the token is on BSC; per CMC, the project is in commercialization.
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.
  • Partners: — (CMC lists some, but without primary links).
  • Where it’s actually used: for AI/robotics cases (per CMC, without verifiable links to clients).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The CMC description claims use‑cases (embodied AI / text‑to‑3D / world models) and “AI‑assisted auto‑labeling” for 3D data, but without primary technical docs/demos/metrics.
  • What is truly onchain? the JOJO BEP‑20 token on BSC; the contract is verified on BscScan.
  • Why is a token needed? token rewards for 3D data providers (CMC description) + the economic layer.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (no verifiable artifacts/metrics), onchain‑washing (apart from the token, the onchain part is not confirmed), a conflict in the supply data (CMC vs BscScan).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality absent 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 1
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is no available Tier‑1 source confirming the project’s AI intent/roadmap.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): CMC/CG are Tier‑2; without an available Tier‑1, intent cannot be counted.
  • Conflict note (if any): the official website is unavailable (unavailable per the available sources).

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the AI features (auto‑labeling/3D pipelines) are not confirmed by the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without access to the primary docs/repositories, “what the AI does” cannot be confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 demos/examples (datasets, API, benchmark) were not found due to the unavailability of the website.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a demo, the operability of the pipelines cannot be confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): quality metrics of the datasets/labeling/models are not published in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no public technical docs/product architecture (Tier‑1) were found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without documentation, an architectural description cannot be counted.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: JOJO: 0x953783617a71A888F8b04f397F2c9e1a7c37Af7e
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x953783617a71A888F8b04f397F2c9e1a7c37Af7e
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): BscScan confirms the contract, decimals=18, holders.
  • Conflict note (if any): supply conflict with CMC.

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: apart from the JOJO token, contracts for datasets/access rights/payments are not confirmed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the platform description does not provide onchain addresses of the logic.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the core 3D data ingestion/processing pipeline can be implemented in a centralized way; onchain criticality is not proven in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): token incentives ≠ proof that onchain is needed for the platform itself.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, JOJO.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x953783617a71A888F8b04f397F2c9e1a7c37Af7e
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the available Tier‑1 sources contain no confirmation that access to data/services is paid for with JOJO onchain.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): CMC describes incentives and data access via agreements/integrations, but not “pay with token”.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the reward mechanics (paying with the token for data uploads) are not confirmed by the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): descriptions from aggregators (Tier‑2) are not sufficient, and the website is unavailable.
  • Conflict note (if any): no payout parameters/contracts.

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the governance role of the token is not confirmed in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of a governance mechanism.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): a reward token for crowdsourcing data looks replaceable (fiat/points/stable) if onchain necessity is not proven.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.jojoworld.com/ (unavailable per the available sources)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without onchain criticality and contracts, the token does not look irreplaceable.
  • Conflict note (if any): none.

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x953783617a71A888F8b04f397F2c9e1a7c37Af7e The JOJO token contract (BEP‑20), decimals/holders, “Max Total Supply” and verified source code.
Tier‑1 https://www.jojoworld.com/ The official website is listed in the profile but is unavailable (unavailable per the available sources).
Tier‑1 — Tier‑1 sources confirming the AI claims (3D data pipelines / auto‑labeling) and the token utility (rewards/access) were not found (the website is unavailable: timeout).
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/jojoworld/ Aggregator: reference profile and description (not Tier‑1).
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/jojoworld Aggregator: reference profile and links (not Tier‑1).

No comments to display

Back to top