Skip to main content

Super Champs

Super Champs (CHAMP) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Super Champs — a Gaming / AI/Agents project: an IP universe (games + animation/social media) in which the $CHAMP token is used for purchases, community programs and potential governance. The token is launched on the Base network (EVM L2).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a gaming/media franchise with an onchain economy (token + NFTs).
  • Who it’s for: players and the community; studios/developers that build games within the ecosystem.
  • Why onchain/token: the CHAMP token is used as the single currency of the ecosystem for purchases and loyalty/staking/reward programs.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: plays games/participates in ecosystem events and uses Super Champs web services/marketplaces.
  2. The system does: accounts for purchases/rewards and the ownership of digital assets via onchain wallets and smart contracts (Base).
  3. The user gets: game assets/perks/participation in community programs.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the CHAMP token and smart contracts/wallets for onchain ownership/transactions.
  5. Token role (if any): purchases (assets/goods/services), community programs (growth/staking), potentially governance.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Super Champs
Also known as (aliases) CHAMP; $CHAMP
Logo (logo) ../assets/235_super-champs_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) CHAMP
Category AI/Agents | Gaming
Primary chain (chain) Base
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) —
Launch date (launch_date) 2024
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xeb6d78148f001f3aa2f588997c5e102e489ad341
Token model (token_type) utility (purchases + community programs + governance)
Max supply 1,000,000,000
Issuance fixed (max supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) token utility: purchases / community programs / governance (whitepaper)
Governance governance via the token is claimed in the whitepaper (details —)
Admins/keys —
Audit yes (Cantina security review PDF)
Bug bounty —
Team (team) Super Champs Protocol Foundation (in the whitepaper)
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) autonomous game-streaming AI Agent
Use‑case (use_case) games + media + on-chain assets
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 2 / 3 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Super Champs describes itself as an IP universe that brings together mobile games, media content and an onchain economy. The whitepaper explicitly speaks of “gaming, animation, Telegram, and AI” and of the ecosystem being “powered by the $CHAMP token”. The onchain part is the CHAMP token on the Base network and interaction via self‑custodied wallets and smart contracts.

Features/modules

  • Games and content (website/whitepaper).
  • $CHAMP token: purchases, community programs (growth/staking), governance (whitepaper).
  • Builder Technology (whitepaper) as a toolkit for partner studios.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a player uses CHAMP for purchases on web marketplaces/in the ecosystem → receives game assets/perks.
  • Scenario 2: a community member participates in growth/staking programs → receives rewards/perks (per the whitepaper).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet supporting Base; the CHAMP token for onchain activities.
  • Network/chain: Base.
  • Fees: Base network fees for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the ERC‑20 CHAMP token contract (Base), ecosystem applications/websites, offchain game/content services.
  • Participant roles: players/community, game developers, operators/foundation; Base validators as infrastructure.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — the token/ownership/transactions; offchain — game logic and content platforms.
  • Dependencies: Base (L2), wallets, web marketplaces, the token’s GitHub repository.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: purchases (assets/goods/services), community programs (growth programs, staking), governance (whitepaper).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: the token is designed as the single “native token of the ecosystem” for transactions and participation in programs.
  • Who pays fees: users during onchain operations.
  • Where fees go: network fees — to Base validators; internal ecosystem fees/charges are not disclosed in the Tier‑1 shown.
  • Issuance/burn: max total supply 1B (BaseScan).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: the whitepaper mentions community programs and staking as a format of incentives (details —).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: the relevant pages were not extracted in this file (there are token allocations/release schedule sections in GitBook).
  • Treasury: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: Super Champs Protocol Foundation (whitepaper).
  • How protocol parameters change: governance via the token is claimed as a use‑case (details —).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: whitepaper + community channels.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: a Cantina security review (July 3, 2024) for the “Super Champs Token” is published.
  • Bug bounty: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Incidents: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Threat model: risks of smart contracts, access rights and centralization of roles (some of the findings are present in the audit).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the CHAMP token is on Base; the website and whitepaper are public.
  • Key releases/milestones: the audit report of July 3, 2024; the roadmap is hosted in Notion (link from the whitepaper).
  • Roadmap: https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/roadmap

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: Base (L2), the token’s GitHub repository, marketplaces (whitepaper/website).
  • Partners: the whitepaper lists investors/partners (at the level of a claim).
  • Where it’s actually used: BaseScan describes onchain usage in the context of the Bullet League and Racket Rampage games (description on the token page).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The Tier‑1 whitepaper says the universe is built “across gaming, animation, Telegram, and AI”; at the same time, there is no technical description of AI modules/metrics on the shown pages.
  • What is truly onchain? the CHAMP token on Base and interaction via self‑custodied wallets and on-chain smart contracts (whitepaper).
  • Why is a token needed? purchases (assets/goods/services), community programs (growth/staking), governance (whitepaper).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing — moderate (AI is claimed, but without technical details), onchain‑washing — low (the token/contract and onchain interaction are described), token‑washing — low/moderate (the token utility is described); what to double‑check — the existence of actually working AI agents/demos and the actual staking mechanics; key AI‑washing risks — “AI” as a franchise label without verifiable details.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity medium 3
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the whitepaper explicitly mentions “gaming, animation, Telegram, and AI”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is an intent/positioning, without technical confirmation of AI.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a specific function of an AI module (what exactly the “AI does”) is not described on the Tier‑1 pages shown.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a mention of AI as part of the universe, but without a specification.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a demo/example confirming the operation of an AI agent was not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.superchamps.com/ ; https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the sources describe the ecosystem, but do not provide a demonstration of the AI component.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics are not presented.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the architecture of the AI component is not described in the Tier‑1 shown.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no technical description/versions of the AI.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Base (EVM)
  • Addresses/identifiers: the ERC‑20 CHAMP contract: 0xeb6d78148f001f3aa2f588997c5e102e489ad341
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0xeb6d78148f001f3aa2f588997c5e102e489ad341
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the network and contract are confirmed by the explorer/CMC.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: the whitepaper describes interaction via self‑custodied wallets and on-chain smart contracts, as well as NFT assets in the ecosystem.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/champ-tokenomics ; https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): onchain logic is claimed as part of the “experience” (purchases/programs), although the details of the ecosystem contracts are not disclosed here.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: games/content can be made without a blockchain, but onchain provides ownership/transactions/programs on a single token.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/champ-tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the criticality of onchain for the core product (games) is not proven as “breaks down without onchain”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, $CHAMP.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/champ-tokenomics ; https://basescan.org/token/0xeb6d78148f001f3aa2f588997c5e102e489ad341
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is described as a pillar of the ecosystem and exists onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the token is used for purchases: buying game assets/goods/services in the ecosystem.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/champ-tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the utility is described in the tokenomics overview.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): community programs include growth programs and staking as a format of onchain commitments/rewards.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/champ-tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics list community programs and staking.
  • Conflict note (if any): the details of the staking conditions are not provided on this page.

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the token can be used for governance “related to the ecosystem”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/champ-tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): governance is listed as one of the key uses.
  • Conflict note (if any): the specific voting mechanics/venue are not described.

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the irreplaceability of CHAMP specifically is not proven in Tier‑1 (this is a design choice of the ecosystem).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/champ-tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): use‑cases are described, but not a “cannot be replaced” test.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.superchamps.com/ basic description of the universe/products
Tier‑1 https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/ positioning (gaming/AI) and description of the ecosystem
Tier‑1 https://whitepaper.superchamps.com/champ-tokenomics token utility: purchases / community programs / governance; onchain approach
Tier‑1 https://basescan.org/token/0xeb6d78148f001f3aa2f588997c5e102e489ad341 token contract, max supply, verified code
Tier‑1 https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/663513b83b977409de5e0edb/66ac0e190e0e80d17f1677ba_report-cantinacode-super-champs-token-4.pdf audit of the token smart contracts (Cantina, 2024‑07‑03)
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/super-champs/ Aggregator: reference profile and links (not Tier‑1).
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/super-champs Aggregator: reference profile and links (not Tier‑1).

No comments to display

Back to top