Skip to main content

Boom

Boom (BOOM) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Boom — a Gaming/Data / AI project: positions itself as an “AI‑powered / AI‑driven data incentive layer” for offchain activity (games/social media/RWA) with the BOOM token (ERC‑20, Ethereum). The whitepaper contains many vision statements; the roadmap includes “AI Tagging & Agent Building” as future stages.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a token economy and a set of (so far mostly descriptive) modules around gaming/social activity and data.
  • Who it’s for: gamers/communities/creators and teams that want a “data incentive” on top of Web3 ecosystems.
  • Why onchain/token: the BOOM token is claimed as a means of payments/rewards and for governance (whitepaper).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: participates in the ecosystem (games/social activities/missions — per the description).
  2. The system does: claims “AI‑driven analytics / AI tagging” and onchain accounting/incentives via BOOM.
  3. The user gets: BOOM rewards and the ability to use the token as the universal currency of the ecosystem (whitepaper).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the BOOM token on Ethereum; the rest of the protocol’s onchain logic is not confirmed by contract addresses in the extracted Tier‑1.
  5. Token role (if any): governance + payments + rewards (whitepaper).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Boom
Also known as (aliases) BOOM; $BOOM; GamerBoom (in the whitepaper)
Logo (logo) ../assets/245_boom_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) BOOM
Category Gaming | AI | Data
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) 2024–2025 (the roadmap describes stages 2023–2025)
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xcE7C3B5E058C196a0EAAa21F8E4BF8C2C07C2935
Token model (token_type) utility (governance)
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) payments + rewards + governance (whitepaper)
Governance governance claimed via BOOM (whitepaper)
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI-driven data incentive layer
Use‑case (use_case) incentives for data/activity
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 3 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Boom describes a “data incentive layer” and an ecosystem around gaming/social activity, where the BOOM token is meant to be used as a universal currency, a reward mechanism and a governance tool. In the roadmap, the project declares future stages: multi‑chain integrations, “AI tagging” and “agent building / agent launchpad”, but the extracted Tier‑1 sources contain few specific verifiable technical artifacts (protocol contracts, demos, metrics).

Features/modules

  • Roadmap modules (claimed): AI tagging, agent building/agent launchpad, “Pulse Network” (roadmap/whitepaper).
  • Token utilities (claimed): governance + payment medium + rewards + cross‑game versatility (token utilities page).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: the user completes activities/missions → receives BOOM rewards (claimed).
  • Scenario 2: a BOOM holder holds the token to participate in governance votes (claimed).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet for BOOM; access to the ecosystem’s products/services (if/where they are available).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (BOOM ERC‑20 token); the roadmap mentions Solana/Base/BNB Chain integrations as stages.
  • Fees: network gas for onchain operations with BOOM.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the BOOM token (ERC‑20) + the “ecosystem/network” elements described by the whitepaper (without an SSOT of protocol contract addresses in the extracted sources).
  • Participant roles: users/creators/BOOM holders; governance participants.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — the token; the remaining logic — not confirmed by technical artifacts in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Dependencies: EVM infrastructure.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: governance + payments + rewards (whitepaper token utilities).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: in the whitepaper, the token is defined as the “cornerstone” of the ecosystem and is required for votes/transactions/rewards.
  • Who pays fees: users during onchain operations; the “payments medium” in the ecosystem — per the whitepaper.
  • Where fees go: gas — to the network validators; the distribution of protocol fees is not disclosed in the extracted Tier‑1.
  • Issuance/burn: max supply 1B BOOM (whitepaper/CMC).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: the reward mechanism and governance rules are claimed; staking/slashing parameters are not confirmed in the extracted Tier‑1.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: not found in the extracted Tier‑1 (the Token Allocation page is cut off in the snapshot).
  • Treasury: not found in the available Tier‑1 sources.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: governance is claimed via BOOM token holders (whitepaper).
  • How protocol parameters change: via votes (claimed); the details of the procedure were not found in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: Discord/Telegram/X (links_*).
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: not found in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Threat model: risks of “AI/data” claims without verifiable artifacts; token/contract risks.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the BOOM token is on Ethereum; the whitepaper and roadmap are published.
  • Key releases/milestones: the roadmap describes stages Q4 2023 — Q4 2025.
  • Roadmap: https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/explore-the-ecosystem/roadmap

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: the roadmap lists Base/Solana/BNB Chain as integration stages (claimed).
  • Partners: the CMC “About” lists investors/eco programs (for reference; requires separate Tier‑1 verification).
  • Where it’s actually used: the extracted Tier‑1 contain no verifiable live cases/protocol contracts other than the token.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? “AI tagging / AI agents / AI‑driven analytics” are claimed in the whitepaper/roadmap, but without demos/metrics/architecture in the extracted sources.
  • What is truly onchain? the BOOM token (ERC‑20) on Ethereum.
  • Why is a token needed? governance + payments + rewards (whitepaper).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): high risk of AI‑washing and onchain‑washing (protocol contracts/artifacts are not confirmed).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity high 3
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the roadmap claims “AI Tagging & Agent Building” and “AI Agent Launchpad”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/explore-the-ecosystem/roadmap
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a roadmap intent, without proof of working AI in the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): “AI‑driven analytics / AI tagging” is claimed, but without a specific description of a working AI module/data flow.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/explore-the-ecosystem/architecture-and-innovation ; https://boomai.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the wording exists, but without verifiable details — 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a public demo of the AI component was not found in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of demos/examples of AI results is not confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics/benchmarks are not published in the extracted Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a detailed technical description of the AI architecture/model versions was not found in the extracted Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/explore-the-ecosystem/architecture-and-innovation
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the page is introductory, without technical details.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: BOOM ERC‑20: 0xcE7C3B5E058C196a0EAAa21F8E4BF8C2C07C2935
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xcE7C3B5E058C196a0EAAa21F8E4BF8C2C07C2935
  • Evidence (Tier‑2, reference): https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/boom/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token address is confirmed by the explorer; CMC — for reference.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: the extracted Tier‑1 contain no SSOT of protocol contract/module addresses other than the token.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): descriptions exist, but without onchain artifacts — 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the onchain criticality of the protocol logic is not proven in Tier‑1 (apart from the existence of the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without confirmed onchain modules, the test is not passed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, BOOM (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xcE7C3B5E058C196a0EAAa21F8E4BF8C2C07C2935
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): BOOM is claimed as the payment medium / cross‑app currency of the ecosystem.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/tokenomics/token-utilities
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): token utilities explicitly describes the “Payment Medium” role.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): BOOM is claimed as a reward mechanism for gaming achievements/social activity validated by AI analytics.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/tokenomics/token-utilities
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): token utilities describes the “Reward Mechanism”.
  • Conflict note (if any): this is a claim, not verifiable onchain payouts.

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): a governance function is claimed for BOOM token holders.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/tokenomics/token-utilities
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): token utilities contains a “Governance Function”.
  • Conflict note (if any): the actual onchain governance mechanisms are not confirmed.

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not proven (the whitepaper builds the utilities around BOOM).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/tokenomics/token-utilities
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is claimed as the “cornerstone” of the ecosystem.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper the main whitepaper/project description
Tier‑1 https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/explore-the-ecosystem/roadmap roadmap (including AI Tagging & Agent Building)
Tier‑1 https://boomofficial.gitbook.io/boom-whitepaper/about-boom/tokenomics/token-utilities token utilities (governance/payments/rewards)
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xcE7C3B5E058C196a0EAAa21F8E4BF8C2C07C2935 onchain SSOT of the BOOM token
Tier‑1 https://boomai.io/ positioning as an “AI‑driven data incentive layer” (brief)

No comments to display

Back to top