Skip to main content

SingularityDAO

SingularityDAO (SDAO) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

SingularityDAO — a DeFi / AI project: a decentralized non‑custodial portfolio management protocol (DynaSets/vaults/staking) that claims AI‑driven strategies (yield optimization + risk engine) and publishes research materials on “automated crypto‑finance agents”. Token: SDAO (ERC‑20, Ethereum; there are also addresses on other networks in the official docs).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a DeFi terminal for portfolio management: asset sets (DynaSets) and vault products.
  • Who it’s for: DeFi users who need a “managed portfolio” without handing over custodial rights.
  • Why onchain/token: the strategy and accounting are implemented onchain (non‑custodial); the SDAO token is used for staking and governance.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the product portal (DynaSets/Stake/Farm) at singularitydao.ai.
  • Status: SingularityDAO merged with Cogito Finance and SelfKey into Singularity Finance; SDAO converts into SFI at 1:1, the first migration phase — since 2025-02-06.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: chooses a product (DynaSets/vaults) and deposits assets/liquidity.
  2. The system does: contracts manage the product rules; the strategy involves dynamic rebalancing and risk control (claimed as AI‑driven).
  3. The user gets: a position in a non‑custodial product and participation in the strategy/returns.
  4. Where the blockchain is: contracts and positions are onchain (EVM); contract addresses are published in the docs; audits/bug bounty are public.
  5. Token role (if any): SDAO staking and participation in governance.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name SingularityDAO
Also known as (aliases) SDAO; $SDAO; SingularityDAO Labs
Logo (logo) ../assets/243_singularitydao_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) SDAO
Category AI/Agents | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) merged into Singularity Finance
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x993864E43Caa7F7F12953AD6fEb1d1Ca635B875F
Token model (token_type) utility (staking + governance)
Max supply 100,000,000 SDAO (Etherscan Max Total Supply)
Issuance fixed (max supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) SDAO staking; voting/governance (docs/website)
Governance DAO/governance via SDAO
Admins/keys —
Audit yes (Hacken + Certik, per the docs)
Bug bounty yes (Immunefi)
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI-driven strategies + risk engine
Use‑case (use_case) non-custodial portfolio management
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 6/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 3 / 3 / 2 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

SingularityDAO is positioned as a decentralized portfolio management protocol in DeFi: a set of products (DynaSets, vaults, staking, DEX/bridge) is combined into a “DeFi Terminal”. In the documentation, the project describes itself as a non‑custodial protocol that supports automated strategies and risk management; “research papers” on the architecture of automated crypto‑financial agents and on experiments/backtesting are published separately.

Features/modules

  • DynaSets: dynamically managed asset sets (docs).
  • Vaults/staking/farming: earn products and lockups (website).
  • Governance: participation of token holders in governance (docs).
  • AI‑driven strategies and risk engine: claimed on the website and backed by the research section (website + docs).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: the user buys/deposits assets into a DynaSet → receives a position in a non‑custodial strategy.
  • Scenario 2: an SDAO holder stakes the token → receives rewards and/or votes in governance.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet (for example, for Ethereum) and assets to interact with the dApp.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (the primary network of the token and contracts; the docs also list addresses for BNB Chain and others).
  • Fees: network gas + DEX/protocol fees (where applicable).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: smart contracts (DynaSets and related contracts), dApp interface, oracle/DEX integrations (see the bug bounty scope with oracle contracts).
  • Participant roles: users/LPs/stakers; governance participants; team/DAO.
  • Where logic runs: position accounting and operations — onchain; analytics/research/models — offchain.
  • Dependencies: onchain oracles/DEX integrations, EVM infrastructure.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: staking and participation in governance (website/docs).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: governance/staking are tied to SDAO; the protocol also uses a set of contracts/products (DynaSets/vaults).
  • Who pays fees: users during onchain operations.
  • Where fees go: gas — to the network validators; protocol fees depend on the specific product (the detailed distribution is not disclosed in the extracted Tier‑1).
  • Issuance/burn: max supply 100,000,000 SDAO (Etherscan/CMC).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: SDAO staking; bug bounty on Immunefi.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Treasury: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Merger with Singularity Finance: SDAO converts into SFI at 1:1 (1 SDAO = 1 SFI; the ratios are calculated from the 200‑day moving average up to 2024-11-26); the SDAO holder vote on the final terms took place on 2024-12-09…13, and the first migration phase started on 2025-02-06.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: governance (docs).
  • How protocol parameters change: via governance processes (details — the Governance section in the docs).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: docs + communities (Discord/Telegram) + GitHub.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: the docs claim Hacken and Certik.
  • Bug bounty: Immunefi program (there is a list of in‑scope contracts).
  • Incidents: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Threat model: risks of strategies, oracles and contracts (including upgradeability), as well as the risks of errors in automated strategies.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: SingularityDAO has ended as a standalone project through the merger: it became part of Singularity Finance together with Cogito Finance and SelfKey, and SDAO converts into SFI (1:1); the SingularityDAO contracts remain on mainnet, and the product description in this card is based on SingularityDAO materials.
  • Key releases/milestones: 2024-10-15 — announcement of the merger with Cogito Finance and SelfKey; October 2024 — the SDAO holder vote on the original terms (95% of more than 15 million SDAO cast — in favor); 2024-12-09…13 — the SDAO holder vote on the final terms; 2025-02-06 — start of the first phase of the SDAO → SFI migration.
  • Roadmap: links_* lists the official roadmap post (2022); a more current Tier‑1 roadmap was not found.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: onchain DEXes/oracles (oracle contracts are listed on Immunefi); web3 wallets.
  • Partners: the website has an “Ecosystem Partners and Backers” list (each item requires separate verification).
  • Where it’s actually used: dApp products (DynaSets/vaults) and onchain contracts.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? AI‑driven strategies/risk engine are claimed on the website; the docs contain research materials with the architecture and backtesting results.
  • What is truly onchain? the DynaSets/vaults contracts and the SDAO token; the token/contract addresses are published in the docs.
  • Why is a token needed? staking and governance (and potentially rewards in the products).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): check the correspondence between the research materials and the real onchain strategies (which part of the “AI” actually affects rebalancing in the products).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 6/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality high 3
Onchain necessity high 3
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the AI component is described as existing and backed by research materials (AI_1..AI_4).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/research-papers/artificial-intelligence
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 applies only if AI_1..AI_4 = 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI‑driven strategies: yield optimization and a risk engine for managing a portfolio/asset set.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.singularitydao.ai/ ; https://docs.singularitydao.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website and docs directly formulate AI‑driven strategies/analytics.
  • Conflict note (if any): the link “AI” ↔ specific onchain rebalances requires separate tracing.

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): an example/description of an “agent” with simulation/backtesting and strategy selection, including portfolio optimization, is published.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/research-papers/artificial-intelligence/adaptive-predictive-portfolio-management-agent
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a reproducible (per the description) example of an experiment/agent architecture and results.
  • Conflict note (if any): this is a research artifact, not direct proof that exactly it manages the current onchain products.

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 1
  • Metrics: ROI in backtesting experiments (return percentages by settings/periods).
  • Context (version/date/how measured): historical Binance data (for example, Sep–Nov 2021; also Oct–Nov 2022) in the research description.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/research-papers/artificial-intelligence/adaptive-predictive-portfolio-management-agent
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the text contains numerical results and the measurement context.
  • Conflict note (if any): research results ≠ a guarantee of quality/results in the production product.

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the agent architecture (swarm/sub‑agents, simulation/backtesting, features/metrics) and the forecasting principles are described.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/research-papers/artificial-intelligence/adaptive-predictive-portfolio-management-agent
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): a detailed technical description of the approach and components is present.
  • Conflict note (if any): the specific model weights/code may not be public.

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum (EVM)
  • Addresses/identifiers: SDAO ERC‑20: 0x993864E43Caa7F7F12953AD6fEb1d1Ca635B875F
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/dynasets/singularitydao-token-contract-addresses ; https://etherscan.io/token/0x993864e43caa7f7f12953ad6feb1d1ca635b875f
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the address is published in the official docs and confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: non‑custodial portfolio products (DynaSets/vaults) and the related contracts/oracles.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/ ; https://immunefi.com/bug-bounty/singularitydao/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the bug bounty lists in‑scope onchain contracts, which confirms the “onchain nature” of the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 1
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: without onchain accounting/execution, the strategy turns into a custodial service without transparency and self‑custody.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs directly describe the protocol as non‑custodial with onchain execution.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, SDAO (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x993864e43caa7f7f12953ad6feb1d1ca635b875f ; https://docs.singularitydao.ai/dynasets/singularitydao-token-contract-addresses
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed by the explorer and the official docs.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): payment of service fees specifically in SDAO is not confirmed in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): in the extracted sources, SDAO is explicitly confirmed for staking/governance, but not as a mandatory fee currency.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): SDAO is used for staking with rewards; there are bug bounty incentives (including payouts in SDAO/USDC).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.singularitydao.ai/ ; https://immunefi.com/bug-bounty/singularitydao/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website provides the staking context; Immunefi describes the payouts.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): governance is described as token‑holder participation (stake/vote).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/governance/governance ; https://www.singularitydao.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs have a Governance section; the website describes vote/stake.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is not proven (SDAO is embedded in governance/staking).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.singularitydao.ai/governance/governance
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): governance/staking at a minimum require SDAO.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://docs.singularitydao.ai/ protocol description (non‑custodial portfolio management)
Tier‑1 https://www.singularitydao.ai/ product claims (AI engine, staking/governance)
Tier‑1 https://docs.singularitydao.ai/research-papers/artificial-intelligence/adaptive-predictive-portfolio-management-agent technical description/experiments/backtesting of the AI agent
Tier‑1 https://docs.singularitydao.ai/dynasets/singularitydao-token-contract-addresses official token/contract addresses (including SDAO)
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x993864e43caa7f7f12953ad6feb1d1ca635b875f onchain SSOT of the SDAO token
Tier‑1 https://docs.singularitydao.ai/security/smart-contract-audits claims about Hacken/Certik audits
Tier‑1 https://immunefi.com/bug-bounty/singularitydao/ bug bounty + list of in‑scope contracts
Tier‑1 https://docs.singularityfinance.ai/background/merger SingularityDAO is one of the three projects whose merger formed Singularity Finance (checked 2026-09-24)
Tier‑1 https://docs.singularityfinance.ai/tokenomics-and-utility/token-merge-and-allocations conversion SDAO → SFI at 1:1 (checked 2026-09-24)
Tier‑1 https://singularityfinance.ai merger dates: the SDAO holder vote on 2024-12-09…13, start of the first migration phase on 2025-02-06 (checked 2026-09-24)
Tier‑1 https://medium.com/singularitydao/singularitydao-selfkey-and-cogito-finance-token-holders-approve-merger-to-form-singularity-finance-97a7beebedcb the SDAO holder vote in October 2024: 95% of more than 15 million SDAO cast — in favor of the merger (checked 2026-09-24)

No comments to display

Back to top