Skip to main content

Numogram

Numogram — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Numogram — a Meme project on Solana, token (SPL; mint: HeJUFD...qpump).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a token on the Solana network (per the project’s links), without a confirmed AI product in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Who it’s for: community members/token holders.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for the existence/transfers of the SPL token; applied onchain logic (other than the token) is not confirmed.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: sends/receives the token via a Solana wallet.
  2. The system does: records transactions on Solana.
  3. The user gets: a token transfer to an address/wallet.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the SPL token and its transactions — onchain on Solana.
  5. Token role (if any): the token’s utility (other than “token exists”) is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Numogram
Also known as (aliases) GNON
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) GNON
Category Meme
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) SPL token (mint address listed)
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) meme token
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary 0 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per Tier‑1 sources, Numogram is a token on the Solana network. No Tier‑1 documentation/repository that would describe an AI product, AI metrics or onchain logic other than the SPL token itself was identified.

Features/modules

  • SPL token on Solana (the mint is listed in the passport).
  • Social links/channels (X/Telegram/Medium) — project context (not Tier‑1).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: sending/receiving the token in a Solana wallet.
  • Scenario 2: viewing the token and transactions via a blockchain explorer.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a Solana wallet.
  • Network/chain: Solana (mainnet).
  • Fees: Solana fees for transactions.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the SPL token (mint) and transactions on Solana.
  • Participant roles: token holders.
  • Where logic runs: onchain on Solana (balance accounting/token transfers).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Issuance/burn: supply parameters are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources (this card has only the mint).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not found).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (not found).
  • Bug bounty: — (not found).
  • Incidents: — (not found).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the SPL token exists on Solana (mainnet).
  • Roadmap: — (not found).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: — (not confirmed).
  • Partners: — (not confirmed).
  • Where it’s actually used: — (Tier‑1 documentation is required).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • What is truly onchain? the SPL token and its mint/transactions on Solana.
  • Why is a token needed? the utility is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (if AI is claimed on social media without docs); what to double‑check — the official docs/whitepaper/repository and the product description.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 partial 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 intentions/roadmap about AI were found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 artifact we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no description of AI features was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 description of AI we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no demo/guide of an AI product was found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a demo/guide we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no AI metrics were found per Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no tech description of the AI architecture/versions was found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without technical details we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: SPL mint: HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the mint address in the explorer confirms the onchain existence of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not confirmed (other than the SPL token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without onchain artifacts of useful logic we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: there is no confirmed product/logic that would require a blockchain other than the existence of the token.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without proof of onchain criticality we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the SPL token exists (the mint is listed).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the presence of the mint address in the explorer confirms the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no confirmed “payment for the service” utility was found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without Tier‑1 utility we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentives/collateral/penalties are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without incentive mechanics we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance via the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without proof we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): without confirmed utility, the token is treated as replaceable/optional.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the absence of utility → we set 1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the project has an AI product/AI features” was found.
Tier‑1 https://pump.fun/coin/HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump Primary token card (name: numogram, ticker: GNON)
Tier‑1 https://explorer.solana.com/address/HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump Onchain existence of the SPL mint address
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/numogram/ Token profile (for reference)
Tier‑3 https://twitter.com/GnonOnSolana Announcements/posts (context)