Skip to main content

Arcona

Arcona (Metareality) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Arcona (Metareality) — an AI/Other + Metaverse project on Ethereum (EVM), token (symbol: ARCONA).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an AR/“digital land” metaverse with the idea of renting/owning digital plots and placing AR content in real‑world locations.
  • Who it’s for: users and creators of AR content/experiences, as well as ecosystem participants who interact with “plots/content”.
  • Why onchain/token: the ARCONA token is positioned as the means of payment for operations (purchase/rent/lease of “land” and 3D content); the presence of AI is so far mainly a roadmap item.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: selects/creates AR content or interacts with a digital “plot”/object.
  2. The system does: links the content to a geolocation/“digital land” and provides access to placement/use.
  3. The user gets: an AR experience in a specific location or the ability to place/monetize content.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the ARCONA token exists on Ethereum; in the project descriptions the blockchain is associated with accounting/rights/payments for digital assets.
  5. Token role (if any): in the project materials the token is described as the currency for buying/selling/renting/leasing “land” and content.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Arcona
Also known as (aliases) Metareality; ARCONA
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) ARCONA
Category AI/Other | Metaverse
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x0f71b8de197a1c84d31de0f1fa7926c365f052b3
Token model (token_type) utility (payments)
Max supply 15,181,707.0131 ARCONA
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) max supply: 15,181,707.0131; ERC‑20
Governance company
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI integration for immersive experience
Use‑case (use_case) AR metaverse + digital land
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 0 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Arcona is positioned as an AR ecosystem (“Digital Land”) where digital plots/content are tied to real‑world locations and can be rented out/used for AR experiences. The project belongs rather to the metaverse/AR content domain; the AI component is currently confirmed mainly as a roadmap item (AI integration to improve the immersive experience).

Features/modules

  • Digital Land / plots: the concept of owning/renting digital plots tied to locations.
  • UGC/content: placing and distributing AR content on top of the “land”.
  • P2P/marketplaces (per the roadmap): exchange/rent/sale of various kinds of assets/data.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user interacts with AR content in a specific location.
  • Scenario 2: a content creator places/updates AR objects tied to a “plot”.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: the project’s application/web portal (specific entry points/onboarding are not recorded per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (for the ARCONA token).
  • Fees: onchain fees depend on operations with the token and the contracts.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: application/web portal + ERC‑20 smart contracts (the token) and related contracts (repositories on GitHub).
  • Participant roles: users, content creators, “plot” owners, the team/operators.
  • Where logic runs: AR content and the client side — offchain; payments/the token — onchain (Ethereum).
  • Dependencies: the project infrastructure, wallets, Ethereum RPC.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: in the project description the token is used as the means of payment for operations with “land/content” (buy/sell/rent/lease) and related payments.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: the necessity of the token for the core functionality is not proven (payments can also be implemented with a stablecoin).
  • Issuance: max total supply 15,181,707.0131 ARCONA (see the explorer).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: company (per public materials).
  • How product parameters change: via product/contract updates; a formalized governance process was not found per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: no confirmed public audits were found per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.
  • Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.
  • Incidents: no public postmortems were found per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the ARCONA token on Ethereum (mainnet); development/milestones are published in the project’s blog/posts.
  • Roadmap: there is a public roadmap board (Metareality) with items and progress.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: smart contract repositories (GitHub); public product/roadmap pages.
  • Partners: — (confirmed Tier‑1 partnerships were not recorded per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date).
  • Where it’s actually used: as an AR content product/ecosystem; specific onchain cases (other than the token) require separate verification.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? the confirmed Tier‑1 fact is the roadmap item “AI integration to improve user immersive experience”; there are no details on “what exactly the AI does”.
  • What is truly onchain? the ARCONA token on Ethereum; a repository with smart contracts exists, but specific production addresses of applications/logic (other than the token) are not confirmed.
  • Why is a token needed? in public materials the token is described as the means of payment for digital plots and content.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (a roadmap item without tech details/demo); onchain‑washing (other than the token, few confirmed onchain artifacts); what to double‑check — the real contracts/marketplaces and their addresses.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the roadmap contains the item “AI integration to improve user immersive experience”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.metareality.space/roadmap
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a Tier‑1 declaration of intent about AI, without proof of working AI.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): what exactly the AI does in the product is not described (other than the general wording “improve immersive experience”).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.metareality.space/roadmap
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a description of the AI’s features/behavior we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a demo of the AI integration was not found per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 demo/guide we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI metrics/benchmarks were not found per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a tech description of the AI component was not found (there is a project whitepaper without specifics about the AI architecture).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.arcona.io/doc/arcona_white_paper_en.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an architecture/versions/a description of the model we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: ARCONA (ERC‑20): 0x0f71b8de197a1c84d31de0f1fa7926c365f052b3
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x0f71b8de197a1c84d31de0f1fa7926c365f052b3
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token address and the network are confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: production contracts/addresses of the “land/marketplace” logic (other than the token) are not confirmed per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.
  • Evidence: Tier‑2 — https://github.com/ArconaEcosystem/arcona-system
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of a repository does not confirm deployed onchain logic of the product → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: it is not shown that without the blockchain the core functionality of the AR content/experience breaks down (other than payments with the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without proof of onchain criticality we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the ARCONA token exists (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x0f71b8de197a1c84d31de0f1fa7926c365f052b3
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the token is used to buy/sell/rent/lease “digital land” and 3D content (as the means of payment).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.arcona.io/doc/arcona_white_paper_en.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is described as the purpose of the token in the whitepaper.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentives/collateral/penalties with the token are not confirmed per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an explicit incentives mechanism we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance via the token is not confirmed per Tier‑1 sources as of the verification date.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a description of voting/a DAO we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the purpose of the token as a means of payment looks replaceable (USDC/fiat) without loss of meaning.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.arcona.io/doc/arcona_white_paper_en.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no “only ARCONA” argument was found → we consider it replaceable and set 1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.metareality.space/roadmap Tier‑1 roadmap item about AI integration (intent) and general tracking of the work
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x0f71b8de197a1c84d31de0f1fa7926c365f052b3 The ARCONA token contract and parameters (max supply and links)
Tier‑1 https://www.arcona.io/doc/arcona_white_paper_en.pdf The purpose of the token in the ecosystem (payments for “land/content”)
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/arcona Token profile (for reference)
Tier‑3 https://medium.com/@arconaico Publications/updates (context/marketing)

No comments to display

Back to top