Skip to main content

Orca Def‑AI

Orca Def‑AI (ORCAi) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Orca Def‑AI — an AI/Agents project on the Solana network, token (symbol: ORCAi).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a set of AI agents/tools for tasks such as chart analysis, wallet tracking and educational scenarios (as described on the official website).
  • Who it’s for: users who need analytics/education tools in a crypto context.
  • Why onchain/token: the Tier‑1 source claims that the ORCAi token is used for subscriptions/access to agents; the onchain part is confirmed by the existence of the SPL token on the Solana network.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the Telegram bots/tools linked from the official website.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: launches one of the agents/bots (for example, the chart scanner or the wallet tracker).
  2. The system does: performs the claimed processing/analysis and delivers the result via the interface (website/bot).
  3. The user gets: answers/results for the chosen task.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the ORCAi token exists on the Solana network; the access/subscription terms are described on the website.
  5. Token role (if any): the website claims that the token is used for subscriptions/actions in the ecosystem.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Orca Def‑AI
Also known as (aliases) ORCAi, Orca Def‑Ai
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) ORCAi
Category AI/Agents
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract 5YSjRtJJTZpQ44YF6qDpyygPCrJ61q5eNJRJRZMvKjZD
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 1,000,000,000 ORCAi (as claimed on the website)
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) The website claims a distribution (including liquidity/listings, community airdrop) and a burn mechanism for subscription payments.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) The names of the members are listed on the website (co‑founders and roles).
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI agents for analytics/training (app)
Use‑case (use_case) chart analysis + wallet tracking
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Orca Def‑AI is described as a set of AI agents/tools for tasks in a crypto context. The website lists individual components (for example, “Graph Scanner”, “Whales & Smart money tracker”, “Crypto Teacher”) and provides links to interfaces (including Telegram bots and website pages). The website also claims the tokenomics and the utility of the ORCAi token as a token for subscriptions/actions in the ecosystem.

Features/modules

  • OrcaGraph (Graph Scanner): a tool linked from the official website.
  • OrcaWhales: a page/tool for wallet tracking (link from the website).
  • Orcademy: “Crypto Teacher” (link to the bot from the website).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user launches a bot/tool → gets a result for the chosen task (scanner/tracker/education).
  • Scenario 2: a user obtains access to agents/features under the subscription model described on the website (the mechanics of the onchain implementation require separate verification).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to the project’s Telegram/web pages; for onchain operations — a Solana wallet.
  • Network/chain: Solana.
  • Fees: Solana network fees for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the ORCAi SPL token (Solana) + offchain interfaces (website/bots).
  • Participant roles: users of the tools/agents.
  • Where logic runs: processing/interaction — offchain (bots/website); onchain — the token and operations with it.
  • Dependencies: Solana infrastructure (wallets/explorer), Telegram.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: the website claims that ORCAi is used for subscriptions/access to agents and “actions across Orca Def‑AI”.
  • Issuance/burn: the website claims a burn mechanism for part of the subscription payments.
  • Distribution: the website provides the distribution structure (percentages by category).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: —.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the SPL token is available on the Solana network; agents/tools are listed on the website.
  • Roadmap: published on the website as a timeline by quarter (see links_*).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: Solana (token), Telegram bots/interfaces, X/Telegram channels (see links_*).
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: use of the project’s tools/bots (verifiable via the public interfaces, links in links_*).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The Tier‑1 source describes a set of AI agents/tools for analysis/education tasks.
  • What is truly onchain? The ORCAi SPL token (Solana). The onchain implementation of subscriptions/access requires separate verification.
  • Why is a token needed? The website claims that ORCAi is needed for subscriptions/access to agents and actions in the ecosystem.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): if access/subscription are implemented fully offchain, the token may be optional; the correspondence of the onchain part to the claimed model needs to be verified.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 sources describe an existing set of AI agents/tools (not only intent).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 applies in the case of “roadmap only”; here agents and interfaces are described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The website lists agents/tools (a chart scanner, a wallet tracker, an educational bot).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 provides a list of functions and the purpose of the agents.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The Tier‑1 website has links to working interfaces (Telegram bots/tool pages).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/ ; https://t.me/ImageAnalyzerbot_bot ; http://t.me/CryptoTeacher002_bot
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The public interfaces make it possible to check the “surface” of the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 set of metrics/benchmarks of the quality of the agents’ operation was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description of the architecture/model versions/limitations was not found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_4 requires technical details and versions, not only a marketing description.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: 5YSjRtJJTZpQ44YF6qDpyygPCrJ61q5eNJRJRZMvKjZD
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/5YSjRtJJTZpQ44YF6qDpyygPCrJ61q5eNJRJRZMvKjZD
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain page of the SPL token confirms the network and the identifier.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: Not established per Tier‑1 (other than the existence of the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): OC_2 requires explicit onchain functionality beyond the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification that a key property of the product breaks down without the blockchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The website claims the ORCAi token with a total supply of 1,000,000,000.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/ ; https://solscan.io/token/5YSjRtJJTZpQ44YF6qDpyygPCrJ61q5eNJRJRZMvKjZD
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 website describes the token and the supply; the explorer confirms the existence of the SPL token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The website claims that ORCAi is used for subscriptions/access to AI agents and actions in the ecosystem.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The official website directly describes the token utility as a subscription/access mechanism.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties as protocol mechanics (other than the burn of part of the payments) are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): TK_2 requires incentives/collateral/penalties with explicit logic; no Tier‑1 confirmation was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The governance role of the token is claimed as a “future role”; specific implemented mechanics are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): TK_3=1 requires a described voting/governance process and the role of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token (for example, with stable payment) is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orcadefai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): An analysis of alternative payment/access mechanisms is needed; Tier‑1 data is insufficient.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.orcadefai.com/ Description of the set of AI agents/tools; tokenomics and the claimed utility of ORCAi (subscriptions/access); team list.
Tier‑1 https://t.me/ImageAnalyzerbot_bot Demo interface (bot) linked from the official website.
Tier‑1 https://t.me/CryptoTeacher002_bot Demo interface (educational bot) linked from the official website.
Tier‑1 https://solscan.io/token/5YSjRtJJTZpQ44YF6qDpyygPCrJ61q5eNJRJRZMvKjZD Onchain fact: the ORCAi SPL token on the Solana network.
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/orcai/ Reference token profile (metadata; not proof of utility).