Skip to main content

Sui Monster

Sui Monster (SUIMON) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Sui Monster — an AI/Agents | Gaming project on the Sui network, token (symbol: SUIMON).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a project around the “Sui Monsters” meme characters with a focus on a game (multiplayer PVP card game) and an NFT collection (per the official website).
  • Who it’s for: players and members of the project community.
  • Why onchain/token: the SUIMON token exists on Sui; per public Tier‑1 sources it is not established that it is “critical” for the operation of the product (other than the circulation of the token).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: visits the website/game or interacts with the content/community.
  2. The system does: provides game scenarios and related activities (per the description on the website).
  3. The user gets: a gaming experience/content, participation in the community.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the SUIMON token on Sui and links to onchain explorers/DEX are confirmed.
  5. Token role: per Tier‑1 sources, no description of a mandatory token utility in the product is established (other than existence and circulation).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Sui Monster
Also known as (aliases) SUIMON, SUILAND
Logo (logo) ../assets/591_sui-monster_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) SUIMON
Category AI/Agents | Gaming
Primary chain (chain) Sui
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Sui)
Launch date (launch_date) 2024
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) native
Token contract 0xc0ba93a810adb498900c82bb6f7c16ca3046dfa7b6f364ec985595fdeb1ee9ad::suimon::SUIMON
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 10,000,000,000 SUIMON
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) The website describes a total supply of 10,000,000,000 SUIMON and a “community owned” narrative.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI agent
Use‑case (use_case) game (PvP card game) + NFT collection
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

In Tier‑1 sources, Sui Monster (SUIMON) describes the setting and the “Sui Monsters” character collection, and also claims a game (a multiplayer PVP card game on Sui) and accompanying activities (NFT mint, links to trading venues, etc.).

As for AI, the website contains wording about an “AI Agent” and “Meme GPT”; however, per Tier‑1 sources no tech description of the AI component/versions/metrics was found; therefore the AI part is recorded as intent/claim without raising “AI reality” above the minimum level.

Features/modules

  • Game: PVP card game (per the project website).
  • Character collection/content: descriptions of the “monsters” and the setting.
  • NFT activities: mint/collection (per the website links).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user enters the game → plays a match/scenario.
  • Scenario 2: a community member interacts with the content/channels → receives news and takes part in activities.
  • Scenario 3: a user takes part in the project’s NFT activities → receives an NFT.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to the website/game; for onchain actions — a Sui wallet.
  • Network/chain: Sui.
  • Fees: Sui network fees for operations with the token/NFTs (if performed).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: website; the SUIMON token on Sui; external links to game/NFT surfaces.
  • Participant roles: players, community members, users of Sui wallets.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — the token; the rest of the game/content logic — offchain (per Tier‑1 sources there is no data on game smart contracts).
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 sources (other than existence and circulation).
  • Total supply: 10,000,000,000 SUIMON (per the project website).

Governance

  • Governance: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (based on the presence of the website/community and the claimed game).
  • Roadmap: — (no separate roadmap document found outside the website).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Ecosystem: the Sui ecosystem (token, NFT venues, etc. per the website links).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The Tier‑1 website mentions an “AI Agent” and “Meme GPT”, but without tech details/metrics; we treat it as intent/claim (AI_0=1, AI_1..AI_4=0).
  • What is truly onchain? The SUIMON token on Sui and links to explorers/DEX are confirmed.
  • Why is a token needed? Per Tier‑1 sources, no description of a mandatory role of the token in the product was found.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI terms without a tech description/metrics; absence of verifiable onchain contracts of the product (other than the token); unclear role of the token other than circulation.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The official website contains explicit mentions of an “AI Agent” and AI‑related activities of the project.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This records AI intent/positioning but does not prove a working AI component of the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): What exactly the AI component does (task, inputs/outputs, limitations) is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website contains AI mentions, but there is no specific description of the AI function sufficient for 1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A demo of the project’s AI component is not established; links to the game/NFTs by themselves do not prove an AI demo.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_2=1 requires a reproducible “touch surface” specifically of the project’s AI feature.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No metrics/benchmarks of the AI component were found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The tech description/architecture/versions of the AI component are not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no sufficient tech description to set 1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Sui
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0xc0ba93a810adb498900c82bb6f7c16ca3046dfa7b6f364ec985595fdeb1ee9ad::suimon::SUIMON
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com ; https://suivision.xyz/coin/0xc0ba93a810adb498900c82bb6f7c16ca3046dfa7b6f364ec985595fdeb1ee9ad::suimon::SUIMON
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The official website and the explorer link confirm the onchain identifier of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No listing of onchain contracts/addresses of the game logic or other modules, other than the token, was found (per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: it is not established that a key property of the product breaks down without the blockchain.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): OC_3=1 requires an explicit Tier‑1 argument for why the blockchain is critical for the product (and not simply “there is a token”).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, SUIMON, on Sui.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com ; https://suivision.xyz/coin/0xc0ba93a810adb498900c82bb6f7c16ca3046dfa7b6f364ec985595fdeb1ee9ad::suimon::SUIMON
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token identifier and the explorer links confirm the existence of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The payment role of the token in the product is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no explicit description of “paying with the token for X service”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties requiring SUIMON are not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of incentives/staking/slashing mechanics where the token is necessary.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The use of the token for governance is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No explicit description of voting/governance mechanics via the token was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://suimonster.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): TK_4=1 requires a justification “can be replaced without loss of meaning”; it was not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://suimonster.com Description of the product (game, characters, activity), AI mentions and the claimed total supply of 10B SUIMON.
Tier‑1 https://suivision.xyz/coin/0xc0ba93a810adb498900c82bb6f7c16ca3046dfa7b6f364ec985595fdeb1ee9ad::suimon::SUIMON Onchain identifier of the SUIMON token on Sui.
Tier‑1 https://t.me/suimonster_land Official community channel (confirmation of the project’s public presence).

No comments to display

Back to top