Limitless
Limitless — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Limitless — a token on the Solana network (SPL). Per the available Tier‑1 sources, an AI component is not established.
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an SPL token on the Solana network.
- Who it’s for: users who interact with the SPL token (wallets/DEX/transfers); use‑case details were not found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Why onchain/token: onchain records ownership/balances/transfers; useful onchain logic other than the token is not established per Tier‑1.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: transfers/receives the token or interacts with it in a wallet/DEX.
- The system does: records transactions and updates balances on the Solana network.
- The user gets: a confirmed onchain state (balance/transaction history).
- Where the blockchain is: token issuance and accounting, ownership and transfers.
- Token role: the role/utility of the token (other than the fact of the SPL token’s existence) is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Limitless |
| Also known as (aliases) | — |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/601_limitless_logo.webp |
| Token symbol (ticker) | — |
| Category | Meme |
| Primary chain (chain) | Solana |
| Type | non-EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Solana) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | SPL |
| Token contract | 44o1iDPGuzHxQgDrPE3HRb2WXwGLsBsY7yMttX47pump |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | Per Tier‑1 sources, no description of utility/issuance/distribution was found. |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | meme token |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 0 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://onlywithneo.com/ |
| Docs | — |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://solscan.io/token/44o1iDPGuzHxQgDrPE3HRb2WXwGLsBsY7yMttX47pump |
| X | https://twitter.com/onlywithneo |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/transcend_reality |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/limitless |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/limitless/ |
General project overview
Limitless is an SPL token on the Solana network. Per the available Tier‑1 sources, it was not possible to confirm the existence of an AI component, a separate protocol, a product, or onchain logic other than the token itself.
Features/modules
- SPL token: onchain accounting of ownership and transfers.
- Public channels: website and social channels (see
links_*).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user receives/sends the token → the transaction is recorded onchain on Solana.
- Scenario 2: a user views the contract/transactions in the explorer → verifies the address and activity.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a Solana wallet.
- Network/chain: Solana (mainnet).
- Fees: Solana network fees for transactions.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the SPL token (accounting of balances/transfers); wallets; network explorers/indexers.
- Participant roles: token holders; wallet users; Solana network validators.
- Where logic runs: onchain (token accounting and transfers) + offchain (UI of wallets/DEX/explorers).
- Dependencies: Solana RPC/indexers (for displaying data).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Protocol necessity drivers: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Who pays fees: users of the Solana network when making transactions.
- Where fees go: to Solana network validators (at the network level).
- Issuance/burn: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
- Treasury: not found per Tier‑1 sources.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: the risks are typical for tokens/wallets (phishing, address substitution, the risk of interacting with unaudited dApps); project‑specific details were not found per Tier‑1 sources.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: mainnet (Solana network; the token is deployed).
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: Solana wallets and explorers (as the network infrastructure layer).
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: onchain activity is available via the explorer (see
links_*).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? Per Tier‑1 sources, no verifiable description of an AI component was found.
- What is truly onchain? Accounting of ownership and transfers of the SPL token on the Solana network.
- Why is a token needed? The utility/purpose of the token (other than the fact of the SPL token’s existence) is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Red flags (based on the information found): claims about an “AI/agent/product” without a Tier‑1 tech description/demo/code; absence of documentation/repository; substitution of “onchain” with the fact of the token’s existence without useful logic.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | no data | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 partial | 0 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 roadmap/declaration of AI intent was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a Tier‑1 source we set 0 (conservatively).
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No description of AI features/model/agent was found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no verifiable description of “what exactly the AI does”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo/example of the AI in operation was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no demo surface confirming an AI component.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Metrics/benchmarks were not found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No tech description of the AI component/architecture was found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without tech docs/code/architecture we set 0 (conservatively).
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Solana
- Addresses/identifiers: SPL token: 44o1iDPGuzHxQgDrPE3HRb2WXwGLsBsY7yMttX47pump
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/44o1iDPGuzHxQgDrPE3HRb2WXwGLsBsY7yMttX47pump
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain artifact (token) is observable via the network explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: Not established (no description of protocol logic other than the token was found per Tier‑1 sources).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of a token by itself does not prove useful onchain logic.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: no property of the product that breaks down without the blockchain (other than the existence of the token) was found per Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no proof of “onchain criticality” per Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has an SPL token on the Solana network.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/44o1iDPGuzHxQgDrPE3HRb2WXwGLsBsY7yMttX47pump
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain token confirms the existence of the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No mechanism of payment for the service with the token was found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of the “payment for the service” use case.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No mechanics of token‑based incentives/collateral/penalties were found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 artifacts of protocol token mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No use of the token for governance was found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of onchain governance.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability/irreplaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a description of the protocol role of the token, we draw a conservative conclusion of 0 (not established).
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://solscan.io/token/44o1iDPGuzHxQgDrPE3HRb2WXwGLsBsY7yMttX47pump | Onchain fact of the existence of the token on the Solana network (token address, transaction history). |
| Tier‑1 | https://onlywithneo.com/ | The existence of an official website/brand context (not proof of AI/onchain logic). |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “the project has an AI component/AI agent” was found. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is useful onchain logic other than the token” was found. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “the token is needed for payments/incentives/governance” was found. |
| Tier‑2 | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/limitless | Reference aggregator card (context; not proof). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/limitless/ | Reference aggregator card (context; not proof). |
No comments to display
No comments to display