SETAI Agents

SETAI Agents (Sentient AI) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

SETAI Agents — an AI/Agents | Infra project on the BNB Smart Chain network, token (symbol: SETAI).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: a platform that, per the Tier‑1 website, is positioned as a “launchpad” for AI agents/projects (the Agents Launchpad section).
Who it’s for: users and teams who want to interact with AI bots/agents and launch projects within the platform.
Why onchain/token: per the Tier‑1 website, the role of the $SETAI token in the ecosystem is claimed; a detailed model of the necessity of the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the Telegram bot “Talk to Sentient AI” (Sentient_AI_bot) and the Agents Launchpad section on the website.

How it works (very briefly)

The user does: goes to the website/documents and selects the launchpad section or the bot.
The system does: provides an interface/information on launching and interacting with agents (as described in Tier‑1 sources).
The user gets: access to the launchpad sections and related materials.
Where the blockchain is: the BEP‑20 token on the BNB Smart Chain network.
Token role: claimed as an “ecosystem token”; the details of “what is paid for/what it gives” are not established per Tier‑1 sources.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	SETAI Agents
Also known as (aliases)	Sentient AI, $SETAI
Logo (logo)	../assets/615_setai-agents_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker)	SETAI
Category	AI/Agents \| Infra
Primary chain (chain)	BNB Smart Chain
Type	EVM
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date)	—
Project status (status)	active
Token (standard)	BEP-20
Token contract	0x5f2ad0a281ea15515c8feff8421cb968cbfe9ae4
Token model (token_type)	—
Max supply	100,000,000 SETAI (max total supply)
Issuance	fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief)	Per Tier‑1 sources, no description of the role of the token in the protocol was found (other than “ecosystem token”).
Governance	—
Admins/keys	—
Audit	—
Bug bounty	—
Team (team)	—
Funding (investors/funding)	—
AI component (ai_component)	launchpad for AI agents
Use‑case (use_case)	launch/catalog of AI agents + projects
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary	ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 1
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	https://aisentient.net/
Docs	https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents
GitHub	—
Releases / Changelog	—
Whitepaper	https://aisentient.net/whitepaper
Roadmap	—
Security advisories	—
Explorer	https://bscscan.com/token/0x5f2ad0a281ea15515c8feff8421cb968cbfe9ae4
App / Demo	https://t.me/Sentient_AI_bot
X	https://twitter.com/AISentient_net
Discord	—
Telegram	https://t.me/SentientAI_net
Medium	—
Audit report(s)	—
Bug bounty	—
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/sentient-ai
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/setai-agents/

General project overview

SETAI Agents (Sentient AI), per the Tier‑1 website, is positioned as a platform/section “Agents Launchpad” around AI agents and related launches. Per Tier‑1 sources, the existence of a public repository, releases or an onchain protocol other than the token is not established.

Features/modules

Agents Launchpad: a list/sections of projects (per the Tier‑1 website).
Bot/interaction (claimed): a link to the Telegram bot “Talk to Sentient AI” on the Tier‑1 website.

Typical scenarios

Scenario 1: a user opens the launchpad → views projects/cards within the platform.
Scenario 2: a user goes to related links/the bot → tries the interaction (if available).

Getting started (wallet/network)

What you need: web access to the website/documentation; for operations with the token — an EVM wallet.
Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain.
Fees: BNB Smart Chain network fees for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

Components: the website/documentation (offchain) + the BEP‑20 token (onchain).
Participant roles: users/creators/community members.
Where logic runs: product functions (if any) — offchain; the token — onchain.
Dependencies: BNB Smart Chain RPC/infrastructure for onchain operations.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

Token utility: no Tier‑1 source was found that describes what exactly is paid for with the token and why the product does not work without it.
Issuance/burn: max total supply 100,000,000 SETAI (per BscScan).

Governance

Who makes decisions: — (no description of governance mechanics was found per Tier‑1 sources).

Security and incidents

Audits: —.
Bug bounty: —.
Incidents: —.

Project status and timeline

Current status: the website/documentation is available; the token exists on the BNB Smart Chain network (see links_*).
Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

Integrations: —.
Partners: —.

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? Per the Tier‑1 website, AI agents are part of the platform’s positioning (launchpad/bot), but Tier‑1 proof of a “working AI component” is not established.
What is truly onchain? The BEP‑20 token on the BNB Smart Chain network.
Why is a token needed? Per Tier‑1 sources, no description of the necessity of the token was found (other than “ecosystem token”).
Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (AI is claimed without verifiable artifacts), token‑washing (the token exists, but the utility is not explained by Tier‑1), absence of public code/releases.

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis

Component	Level	Score
AI reality	low	1
Onchain necessity	low	1
Token necessity	low	0
Evidence	Tier‑1 present	1

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): There are signs of AI reality per Tier‑1 (see AI_1..AI_4), so the AI_0 flag (intent‑only) does not apply.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — see Evidence/links in AI_1..AI_4.
Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0=1 is admissible only when AI_1..AI_4=0; here ai_score without AI_0 = 1.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 artifact was found that describes a specific function of the AI component (what exactly the model/agent does).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aisentient.net/ ; https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents
Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires a specific description of how the AI works; not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): The Tier‑1 website has a link to the Telegram bot “Talk to Sentient AI”, which can be opened and tried.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aisentient.net/ ; https://t.me/Sentient_AI_bot
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The presence of a public interaction interface (bot) is sufficient to record “what you can touch”; it does not prove the quality/model (AI_3/AI_4).
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: —
Context (version/date/how measured): —
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents
Why sufficient / why not (one line): Quality metrics of the AI component were not found per Tier‑1 sources.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The tech description/architecture of the AI component is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents
Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires a tech context; not found.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: BNB Smart Chain
Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0x5f2ad0a281ea15515c8feff8421cb968cbfe9ae4
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x5f2ad0a281ea15515c8feff8421cb968cbfe9ae4
Why sufficient / why not (one line): BscScan confirms the existence of the token on the BNB Smart Chain network.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 0
What useful logic is onchain: Not established (per Tier‑1 sources, only the token was found).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x5f2ad0a281ea15515c8feff8421cb968cbfe9ae4
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 artifacts confirming onchain logic other than the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 0
“Replace the blockchain” test: it is not established that the product breaks down without onchain; onchain manifests through the token.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aisentient.net/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The project has a token, SETAI (BEP‑20).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x5f2ad0a281ea15515c8feff8421cb968cbfe9ae4
Why sufficient / why not (one line): BscScan confirms the existence of the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 source about a mandatory “payment for the service with the token” was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no verifiable description of payment mechanics in Tier‑1.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of incentives/staking/penalties for the token was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of incentive mechanics in Tier‑1.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The use of the token in governance mechanics is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no governance specification.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 argument about the (ir)replaceability of the token was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no design justification.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://aisentient.net/	Tier‑1 positioning: Agents Launchpad and the AI direction (intent).
Tier‑1	https://t.me/Sentient_AI_bot	Demo surface: the public Telegram bot “Talk to Sentient AI” (AI_2).
Tier‑1	https://setai-agents.gitbook.io/setai-agents	Official documents/content of the project (general navigation).
Tier‑1	https://bscscan.com/token/0x5f2ad0a281ea15515c8feff8421cb968cbfe9ae4	Onchain fact: the Sentient AI (SETAI) token, max total supply 100,000,000.
Tier‑1	—	No Tier‑1 source for claim “why the SETAI token is needed in the product” was found.