Virtu
Virtu — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Virtu — a project/token on Base; the explorer describes it as a “friendly AI agent” with a set of tools (claimed). Token: VIRTU.
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an AI agent (claimed) + the ERC‑20 token VIRTU on Base.
- Who it’s for: users/the community who interact with the agent and the token.
- Why onchain/token: the verifiable onchain artifact is the token contract; the role of the token in the product is not established per Tier‑1.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: interacts with the agent/channels and holds/transfers the token.
- The system does: (claimed) helps with tools around agents/tokens and onboarding; the token executes standard ERC‑20 logic.
- The user gets: messages/content (claimed) and onchain token transactions.
- Where the blockchain is: Base mainnet.
- Token role (if any): not established per Tier‑1 (utility/gov/fees not confirmed).
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Virtu |
| Also known as (aliases) | — |
| Logo (logo) | — |
| Token symbol (ticker) | VIRTU |
| Category | AI/Agents |
| Primary chain (chain) | Base |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Base; Ethereum L2) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2 |
| Token model (token_type) | unknown |
| Max supply | 998 684 587.416547988872770694 VIRTU |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | friendly AI agent |
| Use‑case (use_case) | tools + user assistance |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://virtuai.ink/ |
| Docs | — |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://basescan.org/token/0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2 |
| X | https://twitter.com/_Virtu_ai |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/virtutoken |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/virtu |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/virtu-2/ |
General project overview
The Tier‑1 website gives a minimal description (“friendly agent”) and links to channels. The Tier‑1 explorer for the token contains an overview description of the mission and the set of tools (claimed). The verifiable onchain fact: the VIRTU token (ERC‑20) on the Base network.
Features/modules
- —
- —
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: —
- Scenario 2: —
- Scenario 3: —
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: —
- Network/chain: —
- Fees: —
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: —
- Participant roles: —
- Where logic runs: —
- Dependencies: —
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: —
- Protocol necessity drivers: —
- Who pays fees: —
- Where fees go: —
- Issuance/burn: —
- Security/incentive mechanisms: —
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: —
- Treasury: —
Governance
- Who makes decisions: —
- How protocol parameters change: —
- Where decisions are discussed/made: —
- Keys/multisig: —
Security and incidents
- Audits: — (if many — put a table below)
- Bug bounty: —
- Incidents: —
- Threat model: —
Project status and timeline
- Current status: —
- Key releases/milestones: —
- Roadmap: —
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —
- Partners: —
- Where it’s actually used: —
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? in Tier‑1 sources, an AI agent and its purpose are claimed, but without technical artifacts/metrics.
- What is truly onchain? the VIRTU token (ERC‑20) on Base.
- Why is a token needed? per Tier‑1, it is not established how the token is used in the product.
- Red flags (based on the information found): a lack of Tier‑1 artifacts (code/tech description/metrics); token utility is not confirmed.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 1 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A roadmap/declaration of AI intentions as a separate Tier‑1 artifact is not recorded.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 roadmap/official update where AI is described as a plan.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): In the explorer description, the functions/purpose of the AI agent (tools and onboarding) are claimed (claimed).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Tier‑1 description of the agent’s purpose, but without verifiable metrics/code.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://virtuai.ink/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A technical description of the AI part (architecture/versions/artifacts) is not recorded per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://virtuai.ink/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website has links/channels, but no tech docs/repo.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Base
- Addresses/identifiers: the VIRTU token (ERC‑20): 0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Explorer confirms the network/address and max total supply.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: what breaks without onchain: —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token, VIRTU, on Base.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 explorer confirms the onchain token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://virtuai.ink/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://virtuai.ink/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://virtuai.ink/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://virtuai.ink/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://virtuai.ink/ | Public project page and links to channels (minimal Tier‑1 context). |
| Tier‑1 | https://basescan.org/token/0x41e0fe1317Bd6E8944B037cd59b22D428c1434c2 | Onchain fact: the VIRTU token on Base (address, decimals, max total supply) + an overview description (claimed). |
| Tier‑2 | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/virtu | Aggregator (context). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/virtu-2/ | Aggregator (context). |
No comments to display
No comments to display