Skip to main content

AdHive

AdHive — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

AdHive — a project with an ERC‑20 token, ADH, on the Ethereum network; the card links list a website/whitepaper, but the current content at the website URL appears irrelevant (see Evidence).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a token/project related to advertising/content tasks (per the name and whitepaper link).
  • Who it’s for: advertisers/publishers/content creators (not confirmed by Tier‑1).
  • Why onchain/token: the ERC‑20 contract is confirmed; the token’s product role and onchain logic are not confirmed by Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: performs an advertising/content task or posts a task (not confirmed by Tier‑1).
  2. The system does: tracks participation and distributes payments/rewards (not confirmed by Tier‑1).
  3. The user gets: a campaign result/reward (not confirmed by Tier‑1).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the ERC‑20 token contract on Ethereum is confirmed.
  5. Token role (if any): the role of the token in the product is not confirmed by Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name AdHive
Also known as (aliases) ADH
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) ADH
Category AdTech
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) —
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xe69a353b3152dd7b706ff7dd40fe1d18b7802d31
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) Not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) advertising/content tasks
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the card links, the project is associated with the AdHive brand and the adhive.tv domain. However, the content on adhive.tv and the URL previously marked as a whitepaper appear irrelevant to the claimed crypto project at the time of the check (a domain/content conflict or a change of project is possible).

Within DecAIHub, we conservatively record only verifiable artifacts: the ERC‑20 token contract and the existence of a whitepaper at the link. Product details and the role of the token require re‑checking per Tier‑1 sources.

Features/modules

  • Not confirmed by Tier‑1.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: not confirmed by Tier‑1.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a wallet for the Ethereum network (if interaction with the token is needed).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum.
  • Fees: Ethereum fees for operations with the ERC‑20 token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the ERC‑20 token contract; the rest of the architecture is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Participant roles: —.
  • Where logic runs: token operations — onchain (Ethereum); product logic — not established.
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Who pays fees: token users for ERC‑20 operations.
  • Where fees go: to Ethereum validators (network fees).
  • Issuance/burn: —.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: —.
  • Treasury: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • How protocol parameters change: not confirmed by Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: —.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (based on the presence of the token/contract).
  • Key releases/milestones: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Roadmap: No Tier‑1 roadmap found.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: not confirmed by Tier‑1.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? No Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found.
  • What is truly onchain? The ERC‑20 token contract on Ethereum.
  • Why is a token needed? Not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): irrelevant/unexpected content at the website URL; absence of a Tier‑1 description of the product and the role of the token.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present (partially) 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 mention of AI as intent/applicability was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): an AI component is not confirmed in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): An AI component is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no confirmation of “what exactly the AI does” was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): An AI demo is not applicable: an AI component is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): —.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/docs/AdHive_Whitepaper.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 quality metrics for the AI component were found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description of an AI component is not applicable: an AI component is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): —.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0xe69a353b3152dd7b706ff7dd40fe1d18b7802d31 (ERC‑20 contract)
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xe69a353b3152dd7b706ff7dd40fe1d18b7802d31
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is an onchain artifact: an ERC‑20 contract on Ethereum.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not confirmed by Tier‑1 (other than the token/contract).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the protocol’s onchain logic is not confirmed in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): An ERC‑20 contract is recorded in links_*, so the token exists.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xe69a353b3152dd7b706ff7dd40fe1d18b7802d31
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain contract page confirms the existence of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of the token’s payment role was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 mechanics of payment with the token were found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of incentives/collateral/penalties with the token was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 incentive rules were found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of the governance role of the token was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of the governance process via the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://adhive.tv/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a confirmed role of the token, no conclusion can be drawn.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://adhive.tv/ The website URL currently appears irrelevant to the claimed crypto project (a domain/content conflict is possible).
Tier‑1 https://adhive.tv/docs/AdHive_Whitepaper.pdf The URL claimed to be a whitepaper returns irrelevant content at the time of the check (source conflict).
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xe69a353b3152dd7b706ff7dd40fe1d18b7802d31 The existence of the ADH ERC‑20 token/contract on Ethereum.
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/adhive/ Reference profile; not Tier‑1 proof.

No comments to display

Back to top