LeadCoin
LeadCoin — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
LeadCoin — a project that positions itself as a decentralized network/platform for sharing leads (“decentralized lead sharing platform”); token (symbol: LDC).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an application/platform for sharing leads, claimed to be a “decentralized lead sharing platform”.
- Who it’s for: for participants who want to share leads/lead flows (per the project’s claim).
- Why onchain/token: the LDC ERC‑20 token is confirmed on Ethereum; the Tier‑1 description of the web product claims rewards in LDC for sharing data/leads, but the token’s role as mandatory payment/governance is not confirmed by Tier‑1 (see Evidence).
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: publishes/shares leads (per the project’s claim).
- The system does: enables lead exchange within the network/platform (per the project’s claim).
- The user gets: access to leads/monetization opportunities (details are not confirmed by Tier‑1 in this card).
- Where the blockchain is: the ERC‑20 token is confirmed in the Ethereum explorer; a blockchain layer for the product is mentioned in the repositories, but without onchain addresses/an explorer for the product.
- Token role: the LDC ERC‑20 token; no Tier‑1 confirmation of the token’s role as mandatory payment/incentives/governance was found.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | LeadCoin |
| Also known as (aliases) | LeadCoin Network |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/690_leadcoin_logo.png |
| Token symbol (ticker) | LDC |
| Category | AdTech |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | — |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x5102791ca02fc3595398400bfe0e33d7b6c82267 |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | Tier‑1 (repo): “earn LDC tokens by sharing your data/leads” is claimed; the rest of the token’s protocol role is not confirmed by Tier‑1. |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | yes |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | lead exchange in a network/platform |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 0 / 1 / 1 / 1 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://www.leadcoin.network/ |
| Docs | https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork/crowdsale-smart-contract |
| GitHub | https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork |
| Releases / Changelog | https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork/Web-App-Project/commits |
| Whitepaper | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YlZhHsvHuD0K0XRDz_W1M6xdhLvSZPcx/view |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork/crowdsale-smart-contract/security |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x5102791ca02fc3595398400bfe0e33d7b6c82267 |
| X | https://twitter.com/LeadCoinNetwork |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/LeadCoinNetwork |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork/crowdsale-smart-contract/blob/master/audit/leadcoin-audit.pdf |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | — |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/leadcoin/ |
General project overview
Per Tier‑1 sources (GitHub repositories), the project describes itself as “A decentralized lead sharing platform / network”, publishes web application code (frontend/backend) and a separate “Blockchain Layer” (crowdsale smart contracts). However, the product’s protocol onchain logic (OC_2) and the role of the LDC token in product flows (TK_1..TK_3) are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Features/modules
- Web application (per the
Web-App-Projectrepository). - Crowdsale smart contracts (per the
crowdsale-smart-contractrepository).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a participant publishes/shares leads → the network/platform enables exchange → the participant gets access to leads (details are not confirmed by Tier‑1 in this card).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: source code and instructions from the web application repository (Tier‑1).
- Network/chain: Ethereum (per the token contract in the explorer).
- Fees: standard Ethereum network fees for operations with the ERC‑20 token.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: web application and smart contracts (per GitHub).
- Participant roles: users/network participants (not precisely established).
- Where logic runs: app logic — offchain (web‑app); token/crowdsale contracts — onchain on Ethereum (Tier‑1).
- Dependencies: not confirmed by Tier‑1 (other than the web application stack: React/Redux/NodeJS/Express/TypeScript per the README).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: the Tier‑1 description of the web application claims “earn LDC tokens by sharing your data/leads”; pay‑per‑service details are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Protocol necessity drivers: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Who pays fees: the transaction sender (Ethereum gas) for operations with the ERC‑20 token.
- Where fees go: to the Ethereum network validators (standard gas logic).
- Issuance/burn: not confirmed by Tier‑1 in this card.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: payments/earn mechanics in LDC for providing leads/data are claimed (Tier‑1).
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: not confirmed by Tier‑1 in this card.
- Treasury: not confirmed by Tier‑1 in this card.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- How protocol parameters change: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Keys/multisig: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Security and incidents
- Audits: there is a Tier‑1 audit file: ZK Labs / Matthew Di Ferrante (2018‑02‑13); no High/Critical issues were found, 1 note‑issue about a token ownership restriction was noted (see Evidence).
- Bug bounty: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Incidents: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Threat model: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Key releases/milestones: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Roadmap: No Tier‑1 roadmap found.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Partners: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Where it’s actually used: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? Per Tier‑1 sources, no confirmation of an AI component or an AI roadmap was found.
- What is truly onchain? The LDC token contract on Ethereum is confirmed by Tier‑1; the rest of the product’s onchain logic is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Why is a token needed? The Tier‑1 description of the web application claims “earn LDC tokens by sharing data/leads”; the protocol necessity of the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Red flags (based on the information found): no Tier‑1 description of onchain logic and the role of the token; check whether the product and documentation are up to date.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 1 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 partial | 1 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 AI roadmap/AI intent was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no indication of AI intentions in the repositories/description.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI functionality is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No demo of an AI component was found (an AI component is not established).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no subject of AI verification.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: not found (an AI component is not established).
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI metrics are absent.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 tech description of an AI component was found (the AI component is not established).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI architecture/model versions are absent.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: ERC‑20 token: 0x5102791ca02fc3595398400bfe0e33d7b6c82267
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x5102791ca02fc3595398400bfe0e33d7b6c82267
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 onchain artifact (the token contract).
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not confirmed by Tier‑1 (other than the token/crowdsale).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no Tier‑1 artifacts of the product’s onchain logic other than the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): onchain criticality is not proven.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token (contract on Ethereum).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x5102791ca02fc3595398400bfe0e33d7b6c82267
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of the token is confirmed by the onchain explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of the token’s payment role (pay‑per‑service) was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LeadcoinNetwork/Web-App-Project/master/README.md
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data on payment for the service with the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): Tier‑1: the earn mechanism “earn LDC tokens by sharing your data/leads” is described (incentives/rewards).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LeadcoinNetwork/Web-App-Project/master/README.md
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is sufficient for TK_2=1 (rewards); however, collateral/penalties are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of the governance role of the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LeadcoinNetwork/crowdsale-smart-contract/master/README.md
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of governance via the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no argumentation for “replaceable/irreplaceable”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork/Web-App-Project | Repository description: “A decentralized lead sharing platform”. |
| Tier‑1 | https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork/crowdsale-smart-contract | Repository description: “A Decentralized Lead Sharing Network” + crowdsale smart contracts. |
| Tier‑1 | https://github.com/LeadcoinNetwork/crowdsale-smart-contract/blob/master/audit/leadcoin-audit.pdf | Smart contract audit (ZK Labs / Matthew Di Ferrante, 2018‑02‑13): no High/Critical issues found; 1 note‑issue. |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x5102791ca02fc3595398400bfe0e33d7b6c82267 | Onchain artifact: ERC‑20 token contract. |
| Tier‑1 | https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LeadcoinNetwork/crowdsale-smart-contract/master/README.md | Tier‑1 details of the LDC token (ERC‑20) and crowdsale specification (distribution/pricing). |
| Tier‑1 | https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LeadcoinNetwork/Web-App-Project/master/README.md | Tier‑1 product description: “share leads and earn LDC tokens” + web application architecture. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is an AI component/AI intent” was found. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is onchain logic of the product (OC_2)” was found. |
No comments to display
No comments to display