Qubitica
Qubitica — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Qubitica — a project with an ERC‑20 token on the Ethereum network; per Tier‑1 as of the verification date, product details are not established.
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an ERC‑20 token/project; its purpose is not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Who it’s for: not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Why onchain/token: the ERC‑20 token contract is confirmed; the role of the token and onchain logic (other than the token) are not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: performs operations with the token (ERC‑20 transfers/interactions).
- The system does: records operations on the Ethereum network.
- The user gets: onchain confirmation of operations.
- Where the blockchain is: the ERC‑20 contract on Ethereum.
- Token role (if any): not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Qubitica |
| Also known as (aliases) | — |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/698_qubitica_logo.jpg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | — |
| Category | Infra |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x1602af2C782cC03F9241992E243290Fccf73Bb13 |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | Not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date. |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | — |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://www.qubitica.net |
| Docs | — |
| GitHub | https://github.com/dantak2000/qubitica |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | https://qubitica.net/whitepaper |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x1602af2C782cC03F9241992E243290Fccf73Bb13 |
| X | https://twitter.com/Qubitica |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | — |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | — |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/qubitica/ |
General project overview
As of the verification date, the ERC‑20 token contract on the Ethereum network is confirmed, as is the presence of links to the whitepaper and GitHub. However, the website URL returns an “Imprint” page and a list of third-party “solutions/partners”, which may be irrelevant to the crypto project. Therefore, we consider the description of the product and the role of the token not established until explicit Tier‑1 artifacts appear.
Features/modules
- Not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: transfer of the ERC‑20 token → recording of the transaction on Ethereum.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a wallet for the Ethereum network.
- Network/chain: Ethereum.
- Fees: Ethereum fees for ERC‑20 operations.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the ERC‑20 token contract; a repository on GitHub (context, does not confirm product mechanics).
- Participant roles: token holders.
- Where logic runs: onchain on Ethereum.
- Dependencies: —.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Protocol necessity drivers: not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Who pays fees: token users for ERC‑20 operations.
- Where fees go: to Ethereum validators (network fees).
- Issuance/burn: —.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: —.
- Treasury: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- How protocol parameters change: not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: —.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: active (based on the presence of the token/contract).
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? No Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found.
- What is truly onchain? The ERC‑20 token contract on Ethereum.
- Why is a token needed? Not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Red flags (based on the information found): irrelevant/unexpected content at the website URL; absence of a Tier‑1 description of the product and the role of the token.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present (partially) | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 mention of AI as intent/applicability was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.qubitica.net
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Per Tier‑1 sources, an AI component is not confirmed.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): An AI component is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.qubitica.net
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of AI tasks/models.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): An AI demo is not applicable: an AI component is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.qubitica.net
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —.
- Context (version/date/how measured): —.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.qubitica.net
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 quality metrics for the AI component were found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A tech description of an AI component is not applicable: an AI component is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.qubitica.net
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): —.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: 0x1602af2C782cC03F9241992E243290Fccf73Bb13 (ERC‑20 contract)
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x1602af2C782cC03F9241992E243290Fccf73Bb13
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is an onchain artifact: the ERC‑20 token contract on Ethereum.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date (other than the token/contract).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://qubitica.net/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No verifiable onchain mechanics other than the token were extracted as of the verification date.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://qubitica.net/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): An ERC‑20 contract is recorded in links_*, so the token exists.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x1602af2C782cC03F9241992E243290Fccf73Bb13
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain contract page confirms the existence of the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Payment for the service with the token is not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://qubitica.net/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No explicit mechanics for paying with the token were found as of the verification date.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Mechanics for incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://qubitica.net/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No incentive parameters were found as of the verification date.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The use of the token for governance is not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://qubitica.net/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of governance mechanics via the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1 as of the verification date.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://qubitica.net/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a confirmed role of the token, no conclusion can be drawn.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://www.qubitica.net | The website URL currently looks like “Imprint/Company”; a domain/content conflict is possible. |
| Tier‑1 | https://qubitica.net/whitepaper | Whitepaper at the link from links_* (context; not verified as of the verification date). |
| Tier‑1 | https://github.com/dantak2000/qubitica | Repository on GitHub (context). |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x1602af2C782cC03F9241992E243290Fccf73Bb13 | Existence of the ERC‑20 token/contract on Ethereum. |
No comments to display
No comments to display