Cryptoindex.com 100
Cryptoindex.com 100 — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Cryptoindex.com 100 — an index/DeFi project with a token on Ethereum (per onchain facts); the AI component is not established per Tier‑1.
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a project centered on crypto indices; the current Tier‑1 materials describe an index-building protocol ($INDX whitepaper).
- Who it’s for: users who need indices/portfolios and index-creation tools (per the whitepaper).
- Why onchain/token: onchain is used for index smart contracts and operations; within this card, a token contract (ERC‑20) on Ethereum is confirmed.
How it works (very briefly)
- The creator forms an index: chooses the network, tokens, weights and fees (per the whitepaper).
- The index is deployed as a smart contract: a separate contract for each index.
- Users enter/exit the index: receive index tokens confirming their share and participate in votes on rebalancing.
- Where the blockchain is: index smart contracts and onchain operations; separately — the ERC‑20 token contract from links_*.
- Token role: per the whitepaper, $INDX is used for fees/subscriptions/incentives; the link between these mechanics and specifically the “Cryptoindex.com 100” contract from links_* requires a separate reconciliation.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Cryptoindex.com 100 |
| Also known as (aliases) | — |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/708_cryptoindex-com-100_logo.svg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | — |
| Category | DeFi |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | — |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x6393e822874728f8afa7e1c9944e417d37ca5878 |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | The Tier‑1 whitepaper describes the utility of the $INDX token (subscriptions/fees/incentives); the link to the given ERC‑20 contract requires a separate reconciliation. |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | index-building protocol + index tokens |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://cryptoindex.com |
| Docs | https://cryptoindex.com/wp |
| GitHub | https://github.com/phenom-company/smartcontract-cryptoindex |
| Releases / Changelog | https://github.com/phenom-company/smartcontract-cryptoindex/commits |
| Whitepaper | https://cryptoindex.com/wp |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | https://github.com/phenom-company/smartcontract-cryptoindex/security |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x6393e822874728f8afa7e1c9944e417d37ca5878 |
| X | https://twitter.com/IndexCrypto |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/indexcrypto |
| Medium | https://medium.com/@CryptoIndex |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | — |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cryptoindex-com-100/ |
General project overview
No Tier‑1 source describing specifically “Cryptoindex.com 100” as a particular product/index was found. At the same time, a Tier‑1 $INDX whitepaper (July 2024) is available on the official domain, describing a “decentralized index‑building protocol” with index smart contracts, a creation/entry/exit process, fees and utility of the $INDX token.
This card also has an onchain artifact: an ERC‑20 token contract on Ethereum. However, the link between this contract and the protocol described in the $INDX whitepaper requires a separate reconciliation in Tier‑1 sources (not established per Tier‑1).
Features/modules
- Index creation: selection of the network/tokens/weights/fees and deployment of a separate smart contract for each index (per the whitepaper).
- Voting and rebalancing: changing the composition of an index through a discussion/voting procedure (per the whitepaper).
- $INDX utility (description): subscriptions for creators and fee payments/incentives (per the whitepaper).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a creator creates an index → sets parameters and deploys the contract (per the whitepaper).
- Scenario 2: a user buys an index → receives an index token, participates in rebalancing governance (per the whitepaper).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an EVM wallet for interacting with Ethereum.
- Network/chain: Ethereum.
- Fees: Ethereum network fees for onchain operations.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: index smart contracts (per the whitepaper description) and an ERC‑20 token (contract in links_*).
- Where logic runs: onchain — contract deployment/operations; offchain — interfaces/analytics (per the description).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: The Tier‑1 whitepaper describes $INDX utility (creator subscriptions, fees, rewards).
- Limitation: the link between the utility in the whitepaper and the given “Cryptoindex.com 100” contract is not established per Tier‑1.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1.
- How protocol parameters change: not established per Tier‑1.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: not established per Tier‑1.
- Keys/multisig: not established per Tier‑1.
Security and incidents
- Audits: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Bug bounty: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Incidents: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
- Threat model: not established per Tier‑1.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: —.
- Key releases/milestones: not established per Tier‑1.
- Roadmap: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: not established per Tier‑1.
- Partners: not established per Tier‑1.
- Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? No Tier‑1 confirmation of the project’s AI component was found.
- What is truly onchain? The ERC‑20 token on Ethereum (contract in links_*); the whitepaper describes index smart contracts.
- Why is a token needed? utility is described for $INDX in the Tier‑1 whitepaper; the link to the token from links_* requires separate verification.
- Red flags (based on the information found): possible confusion between different tokens/products (CIX100 vs $INDX); without an explicit Tier‑1 link, tokenomics cannot be transferred.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | — | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 partial | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 AI intent was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without Tier‑1, we do not set AI intent.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): An AI component of the product is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no grounds.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No AI demo was found per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no demo surface.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI metrics were not found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The AI architecture is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no grounds.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: ERC‑20: 0x6393e822874728f8afa7e1c9944e417d37ca5878
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x6393e822874728f8afa7e1c9944e417d37ca5878
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain fact of the token contract is confirmed by the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1 specifically for this token/product.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cryptoindex.com/wp
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper describes onchain index contracts, but the link to this contract is not established.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cryptoindex.com/wp
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no explicit “replacement test”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): There is an ERC‑20 token (the contract is given in links_*).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x6393e822874728f8afa7e1c9944e417d37ca5878
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The contract is observable.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Pay‑for‑service mechanics for this token are not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cryptoindex.com/wp
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper describes fees in $INDX; the link to this contract is not established.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Incentives/staking/collateral for this token are not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cryptoindex.com/wp
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper describes rewards in $INDX; the link to this contract is not established.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Governance use of this token is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cryptoindex.com/wp
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Voting mechanics are described for index tokens; the link for this contract is not established.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cryptoindex.com/wp
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Insufficient data.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://cryptoindex.com/wp | Tier‑1 $INDX whitepaper: description of the index protocol, fees, utility of the $INDX token. |
| Tier‑1 | https://cryptoindex-1.gitbook.io/cryptoindex-whitepaper | Tier‑1 GitBook whitepaper (structure/sections of the whitepaper). |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x6393e822874728f8afa7e1c9944e417d37ca5878 | Onchain fact of the ERC‑20 contract of the token in this card. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “what is real AI here” was found. |
No comments to display
No comments to display