ElamaChain

ElamaChain — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

ElamaChain — a project with a token on the Ethereum network (per onchain facts), the AI component is not established per Tier‑1.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: a project with a token and a public contract on Ethereum; what exactly the product does is not established per Tier‑1.
Who it’s for: not established per Tier‑1.
Why onchain/token: the onchain fact of the token is confirmed; the necessity of onchain and the role of the token are not established per Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

The user interacts with the token: transfers/storage in a wallet (ERC‑20).
The onchain layer records operations: standard ERC‑20 events (per the explorer data).
Product role/useful logic: not established per Tier‑1.
Where the blockchain is: Ethereum (the token contract is given in links_*).
Token role: not established per Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	ElamaChain
Also known as (aliases)	—
Logo (logo)	../assets/704_elamachain_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker)	—
Category	—
Primary chain (chain)	Ethereum
Type	EVM
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date)	—
Project status (status)	—
Token (standard)	ERC-20
Token contract	0xfb444c1f2b718ddfc385cb8fd9f2d1d776b24668
Token model (token_type)	—
Max supply	—
Issuance	—
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief)	No Tier‑1 description of utility/tokenomics was found.
Governance	—
Admins/keys	—
Audit	—
Bug bounty	—
Team (team)	—
Funding (investors/funding)	—
AI component (ai_component)	—
Use‑case (use_case)	—
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary	ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 1
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	https://www.elamachain.io/
Docs	https://elamachain.io/img/whitepaper.pdf
GitHub	https://github.com/ElamaChain
Releases / Changelog	—
Whitepaper	https://elamachain.io/img/whitepaper.pdf
Roadmap	—
Security advisories	—
Explorer	https://etherscan.io/token/0xfb444c1f2b718ddfc385cb8fd9f2d1d776b24668
X	https://twitter.com/elamachain
Discord	—
Telegram	https://t.me/elamachain
Medium	https://medium.com/@elamachain
Audit report(s)	—
Bug bounty	—
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	—
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/elamachain/

General project overview

No valid Tier‑1 document/page describing the ElamaChain product and its purpose was found. The available links in this card confirm the existence of a token on Ethereum (via the explorer) and the presence of a GitHub organization, but do not provide sufficient verifiable data to assert “what is real AI here” or “why is a token needed” at the protocol level.

Features/modules

ERC‑20 token: the onchain contract and token operations.
GitHub organization: the presence of links to source code (without a conclusion about the product’s purpose per Tier‑1).

Typical scenarios

Scenario 1: a user holds/transfers the token on Ethereum.

Getting started (wallet/network)

What you need: a wallet for Ethereum.
Network/chain: Ethereum.
Fees: Ethereum network fees for operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

Components: the ERC‑20 token contract.
Where logic runs: onchain — standard token operations; other logic is not established.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

Token utility: not established per Tier‑1.
Protocol necessity drivers: not established.

Governance

Who makes decisions: not established.

Security and incidents

Audits: not found in Tier‑1 sources.
Bug bounty: not found in Tier‑1 sources.

Project status and timeline

Current status: —.
Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

Integrations: not established per Tier‑1.
Partners: not established per Tier‑1.
Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1.

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? No Tier‑1 confirmation of the project’s AI component was found.
What is truly onchain? The ERC‑20 token on Ethereum (contract in links_*).
Why is a token needed? No Tier‑1 source on the necessity of the token was found.
Red flags (based on the information found): the set of claims about AI/onchain/token is not confirmed by Tier‑1 (other than the fact of the token’s existence).

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)

Component	Level	Score
AI reality	—	0
Onchain necessity	low	1
Token necessity	low	0
Evidence	Tier‑1 partial	1

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 claim/roadmap about AI was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a Tier‑1 source, we do not set AI intent.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of the product’s AI features was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no grounds for AI_1=1.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No AI demo was found per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no verifiable demo surface.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: —
Context (version/date/how measured): —
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): Metrics/benchmarks were not found.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): A tech description of the AI architecture was not found per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no grounds for AI_4=1.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: Ethereum
Addresses/identifiers: ERC‑20: 0xfb444c1f2b718ddfc385cb8fd9f2d1d776b24668
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xfb444c1f2b718ddfc385cb8fd9f2d1d776b24668
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain fact of the contract is observable in the explorer.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 0
What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of onchain logic other than the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 0
“Replace the blockchain” test: not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no argument for onchain criticality.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The project has an ERC‑20 token (the contract is given in links_*).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xfb444c1f2b718ddfc385cb8fd9f2d1d776b24668
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is observable.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of pay‑per‑service was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no documentation on utility.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of incentives/collateral was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no grounds for TK_2=1.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of the use of the token for governance was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no grounds for TK_3=1.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is insufficient data.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://etherscan.io/token/0xfb444c1f2b718ddfc385cb8fd9f2d1d776b24668	Onchain fact of the existence of the ERC‑20 token (contract address).
Tier‑1	—	No Tier‑1 source for claim “what is real AI here” was found.
Tier‑1	—	No Tier‑1 source for claim “why is a token needed” was found.