COQ AI
COQ AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
COQ AI — a meme‑oriented project/token on Avalanche (per the explorer link in links_*). No Tier‑1 confirmation of a working AI component was found.
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a token/community project with “AI” branding (per the project’s public materials).
- Who it’s for: community members/token holders.
- Why onchain/token: the onchain part is the token contract on the Avalanche network; separate “protocol” logic beyond the token is not established per Tier‑1.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: interacts with the token on the Avalanche network.
- The system does: executes standard token operations (transfer/approve) on the smart contract.
- The user gets: ownership of the token/token transfers.
- Where the blockchain is: the token contract on Avalanche (C‑Chain).
- Token role (if any): no description of utility roles of the token as payment/incentives/governance was found in Tier‑1 sources.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | COQ AI |
| Also known as (aliases) | — |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/534_coq-ai_logo.ico |
| Token symbol (ticker) | — |
| Category | Meme |
| Primary chain (chain) | Avalanche |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Avalanche) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0xe7d69acbc00d0ec5d9c02162310ee21daa77f69c |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | — |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 0 / 1 / 0 / 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://ai.coq.xyz/ |
| Docs | — |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://snowscan.xyz/token/0xe7d69acbc00d0ec5d9c02162310ee21daa77f69c |
| X | https://twitter.com/COQ_AI |
| Discord | https://discord.gg/un4EZSc432 |
| Telegram | https://t.me/CoqInuAvax |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | — |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/coq-ai/ |
General project overview
COQ AI is a project/token with “AI” branding. No Tier‑1 description of a working AI component (model/agents/metrics) was found. The verifiable part is the token contract on the Avalanche network (explorer link in links_*).
Features/modules
- Onchain token (Avalanche).
- Public channels/communities of the project (social media).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user interacts with the token → performs transfers/other operations with the token.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an EVM wallet with Avalanche C‑Chain support.
- Network/chain: Avalanche.
- Fees: Avalanche network fees for onchain operations.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the token contract on Avalanche.
- Participant roles: token holders.
- Where logic runs: onchain — the token; the offchain part of the product (if any) is not established per Tier‑1.
- Dependencies: the Avalanche network/infrastructure.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: not established per Tier‑1.
- Protocol necessity drivers: no Tier‑1 description of the necessity of the token as payment/incentives/governance was found.
- Who pays fees: users performing onchain operations with the token.
- Where fees go: Avalanche network fees.
- Issuance/burn: —.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: —.
- Treasury: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: —.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: risks of standard interactions with the token; separate verification of the contract and admin rights (if any) is required.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: active (token on mainnet).
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: —.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? No Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found (what the model/agent does, demo, metrics, tech description).
- What is truly onchain? The token contract on Avalanche.
- Why is a token needed? No Tier‑1 confirmation of the necessity of the token as payment/incentives/governance was found.
- Red flags (based on the information found): “AI” in the name without Tier‑1 artifacts (demo/metrics/architecture); the role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | no Tier‑1 data | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 partial | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 declaration of AI intentions (roadmap/official update) was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The name/branding is not proof of intent without a Tier‑1 roadmap/statement.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of “what the AI does” (model/task/input‑output) was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The available materials contain no description of an AI feature.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No public demo of an AI component confirmed by a Tier‑1 source was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no explicit demo/examples.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: not found per Tier‑1
- Context (version/date/how measured): not found per Tier‑1
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Metrics are absent in Tier‑1 sources.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A tech description/architecture/versions of an AI module are not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no technical documentation/repository in Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Avalanche (C‑Chain)
- Addresses/identifiers: 0xe7d69acbc00d0ec5d9c02162310ee21daa77f69c
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://snowscan.xyz/token/0xe7d69acbc00d0ec5d9c02162310ee21daa77f69c
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a token contract address and a network explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: per Tier‑1, no confirmation of onchain logic other than the token was found
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://snowscan.xyz/token/0xe7d69acbc00d0ec5d9c02162310ee21daa77f69c
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is available, but no other onchain functionality is established.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: it is not established that without onchain the product loses a key property (per Tier‑1)
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://snowscan.xyz/token/0xe7d69acbc00d0ec5d9c02162310ee21daa77f69c
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The sources do not substantiate the criticality of onchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token (the contract is in the explorer).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://snowscan.xyz/token/0xe7d69acbc00d0ec5d9c02162310ee21daa77f69c
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is confirmed by the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of a payment role of the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 document/section where the token is described as payment for the service.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of incentives/collateral/penalties with the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of incentive mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A governance role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of a DAO/voting.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): There are no Tier‑1 grounds to assert the replaceability/irreplaceability of the token.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://ai.coq.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of the token utility to draw a conclusion.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://snowscan.xyz/token/0xe7d69acbc00d0ec5d9c02162310ee21daa77f69c | Onchain fact: the token contract on Avalanche. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is a working AI component/agents/model” was found. |
| Tier‑1 | https://ai.coq.xyz/ | The official website of the project (without technical details/demo/metrics on AI per Tier‑1). |
No comments to display
No comments to display