Fame AI
Fame AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Fame AI — an AI‑oriented consumer project (AI influencers / FameEngine, claimed in the Tier‑1 docs), token: FMC (ERC‑20, Ethereum).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an AI platform/“AI agency” around AI influencers and the Fame App application (described in the Tier‑1 documentation).
- Who it’s for: content creators/communities and brands (claimed in the Tier‑1 docs).
- Why onchain/token: the FMC token is used as the currency/“gas” inside the platform and for staking/participation in decision‑making (claimed in the Tier‑1 docs).
- What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): https://app.getfame.ai/ (Create AI Agent)
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: interacts with the Fame AI products and holds/uses the FMC token.
- The system does: provides the features of the FameEngine platform and AI content/AI personas (as described in the Tier‑1 docs).
- The user gets: access to platform features/credits and participation in the staking mechanics (per the Tier‑1 docs).
- Where the blockchain is: the FMC ERC‑20 token contract (Ethereum).
- Token role (if any): payment/“gas” inside the product + staking and participation in decisions (claimed).
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Fame AI |
| Also known as (aliases) | GetFameAI; FameEngine; FMC |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/536_fame-ai_logo.ico |
| Token symbol (ticker) | FMC |
| Category | AI/Other | Consumer |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x6bfDB6f4E65Ead27118592A41eB927cEa6956198 |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (payments + staking + governance) |
| Max supply | 10,000,000,000 |
| Issuance | fixed |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | Total supply: 10,000,000,000 FMC |
| Governance | DAO (as claimed) |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI-influencers + FameEngine |
| Use‑case (use_case) | AI persona/content creation |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 2 / 1 / 3 / 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://getfame.ai/ |
| App / Demo | https://app.getfame.ai/ |
| Docs | https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTA6gjnx6x6rp9eh_wkfpu0ulz2_3ZhcpgcXQa2ZPQhPJZCSdJR5WoWTtKGhMMn7-gfYHrQwzmcBNre/pub |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai |
| Roadmap | https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai/fame-ai-agency/roadmap |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x6bfDB6f4E65Ead27118592A41eB927cEa6956198 |
| X | https://twitter.com/GetFameAI |
| Discord | https://discord.com/invite/getfameai |
| Telegram | https://t.me/getfameai |
| Medium | https://medium.com/@GetFameAI |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/fame-ai |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/fame-ai/ |
General project overview
Fame AI is a consumer project that the Tier‑1 documentation describes as an AI agency/platform around AI influencers and the Fame App application. The onchain part in the available sources is represented by the FMC token (ERC‑20).
Features/modules
- AI influencers (claimed in the Tier‑1 docs).
- Fame App / FameEngine (claimed in the Tier‑1 docs).
- FMC token utility inside the platform (Tier‑1).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user uses the Fame AI platform/products → receives AI content/an AI persona (per the description in the Tier‑1 docs).
- Scenario 2: a user stakes FMC in a pool → receives in‑app credits and potential rewards (claimed in the Tier‑1 docs).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: access to the Fame AI products (website/communities) and an EVM wallet for working with the token.
- Network/chain: Ethereum.
- Fees: Ethereum network fees for onchain operations with the token.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: offchain products (FameEngine/Fame App, claimed) + the onchain FMC token (ERC‑20).
- Participant roles: platform users; token holders/stakers.
- Where logic runs: onchain — the token; the rest of the logic — offchain (per the meaning of the description in the Tier‑1 docs; technical details are not established per Tier‑1).
- Dependencies: the Ethereum network/infrastructure.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: the FMC token is described as the currency inside FameEngine, “gas fees” for AI learning/data acquisition, and also as a staking asset (Tier‑1).
- Protocol necessity drivers: the Tier‑1 docs claim that the token is used for access to features and participation in the platform mechanics.
- Who pays fees: users performing onchain operations with the token.
- Where fees go: Ethereum network fees.
- Issuance/burn: fixed supply (Tier‑1: total token supply).
- Security/incentive mechanisms: staking (Tier‑1; the details of the mechanics require separate verification per Tier‑1).
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: the Tier‑1 docs have a Vesting Schedule section (details not extracted).
- Treasury: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: DAO decision‑making by token holders is claimed (Tier‑1: token utility).
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: risks of the token’s smart contracts and risks of the offchain product (details require separate verification).
Project status and timeline
- Current status: active (website/docs available; token on mainnet).
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: available in the Tier‑1 docs (see links_*).
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: inside the Fame AI products (claimed; details require clarification per Tier‑1).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? In the Tier‑1 docs, the project describes AI influencers and an application that uses AI to create/manage a digital persona and content. Metrics/architecture/model versions are not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- What is truly onchain? The FMC ERC‑20 token (Ethereum).
- Why is a token needed? In the Tier‑1 docs, the token is claimed as the currency/“gas” inside the platform, an asset for staking and voting.
- Red flags (based on the information found): most of the product is offchain; few technical details/metrics on AI in the available Tier‑1 materials; the economics/staking mechanics need to be double‑checked per Tier‑1.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 2 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | high | 3 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI is described as part of the product, so the intent flag does not apply.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Tier‑1 description of the AI product, so AI_1 is considered directly.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): AI is used to create/manage AI influencers and AI‑enhanced content (described in the project docs).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 docs explicitly describe the AI component and its purpose.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): There is a Tier‑1 web application for creating an AI agent (“Create AI Agent” → app.getfame.ai).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://agent.getfame.ai/ ; https://app.getfame.ai/ ; https://getfame.ai/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a public product entry point that allows one to “touch” the key feature (creating an AI agent).
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: not found per Tier‑1
- Context (version/date/how measured): not found per Tier‑1
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The available Tier‑1 docs contain no quantitative metrics/benchmarks.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A tech description of the AI model/architecture/versions sufficient for AI_4=1 was not found per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are product descriptions, but no technical specification/versions.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: 0x6bfDB6f4E65Ead27118592A41eB927cEa6956198
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x6bfDB6f4E65Ead27118592A41eB927cEa6956198
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract and its parameters are available in the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: per Tier‑1 sources, no confirmation of onchain logic other than the token was found
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai ; https://etherscan.io/token/0x6bfDB6f4E65Ead27118592A41eB927cEa6956198
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The available sources describe the utility of the token, but not the onchain mechanics of a protocol.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: it is not established that a key property of the product breaks down without onchain (per Tier‑1)
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Onchain necessity is described only via the token utility; “criticality” is not substantiated.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token, FMC (ERC‑20).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x6bfDB6f4E65Ead27118592A41eB927cEa6956198
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is confirmed by the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): The FMC token is described as the currency/“gas fee” inside FameEngine for AI learning and access to features.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai/usdfmc/token-utility
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 docs explicitly describe the payment role of the token in the product.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): Staking FMC in a pool generates in‑app credits and gives rewards (part of the revenue is reinvested).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai/usdfmc/token-utility
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 docs describe incentive mechanics via staking.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): The Tier‑1 docs claim that token holders participate in DAO decisions via voting.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai/usdfmc/token-utility
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 docs describe the governance role of the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of the “replaceability” of the token without loss of the claimed functionality was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai/usdfmc/token-utility
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): In the docs, the token is described as the central currency/mechanic, so we conservatively set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai | Description of the product (AI influencers/Fame App) as the AI component of the project. |
| Tier‑1 | https://agent.getfame.ai/ ; https://app.getfame.ai/ | Demo/web application for creating an AI agent (AI_2). |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x6bfDB6f4E65Ead27118592A41eB927cEa6956198 | Onchain fact: the FMC token (ERC‑20), contract address and max supply. |
| Tier‑1 | https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai/usdfmc/token-utility | Token utility: payments/“gas”, staking and the claimed governance mechanics. |
| Tier‑1 | https://fame.gitbook.io/fame-ai/usdfmc/tokenomics | Total token supply and the contract address (in the docs). |
No comments to display
No comments to display